IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/nddaer/23272.html

World Feed Barley Trade Under Alternative Trade Policy Scenarios

Author

Listed:
  • Mao, Weining
  • Koo, Won W.
  • Krause, Mark A.

Abstract

A spatial equilibrium model based on a quadratic programming algorithm was developed to analyze world feed barley trade and international competition among major exporters (Australia, Canada, the European Union, and the United States) under the current and alternative trade policy scenarios. The U.S. Export Enhancement Program (EEP) plays an important role to maintain U.S. market share in importing countries. Eliminating Canadian rail subsidy decreases Canadian offshore exports, but greatly increases its exports to the United States. The North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) increases feed barley trade within North America, but has little impact on world trade flows for feed barley. Canada benefits most under the Uruguay Round Agreement of GATT and the world free trade through significantly higher exports to offshore markets and the United States. Australia also gains from free trade. The European Union is worse off under free trade.

Suggested Citation

  • Mao, Weining & Koo, Won W. & Krause, Mark A., 1996. "World Feed Barley Trade Under Alternative Trade Policy Scenarios," Agricultural Economics Reports 23272, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:nddaer:23272
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.23272
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/23272/files/aer350.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.23272?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Premakumar, V. & Oerter, K. & Smith, D. & Meyers, William H., 1994. "Uruguay Round Agreement on Agriculture: Summary of Commitments from Selected Country Schedules," Staff General Research Papers Archive 822, Iowa State University, Department of Economics.
    2. Johnson, D. Demcey & Varghese, Beena, 1993. "Estimating Regional Demand for Feed Barley: A Linear-Programming Approach," Agricultural Economics Reports 23127, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    3. Golz, Joel T. & Koo, Won W., 1993. "Spatial Equilibrium Analysis of the World Wheat Market Under Alternative Trade Policies," Agricultural Economics Reports 23271, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    4. Richard Gray & Alvin Ulrich & Andrew Schmitz, 1993. "A Continental Barley Market: Where Are the Gains?," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 41(3), pages 257-270, November.
    5. Johnson, D. Demcey & Wilson, William W., 1994. "North American Barley Trade and Competition," Agricultural Economics Reports 23475, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    6. Colin A. Carter, 1993. "The Economics of a Single North American Barley Market," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 41(3), pages 243-255, November.
    7. T. Takayama & G. G. Judge, 1964. "Spatial Equilibrium and Quadratic Programming," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 46(1), pages 67-93.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Koo, Won W., 1998. "Bilateral Trade Of Durum Wheat And Barley Under Custa And Implications For Farm Price And Income," Agricultural Economics Reports 23415, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    2. Amanor-Boadu, Vincent & Hobbs, Jill E. & Kruja, Zana & Martin, Larry J., 1999. "Net Benefits Of Increased Trade Liberalization To The Canadian Economy," Miscellaneous Publications 18089, George Morris Center.
    3. Koo, Won W. & Uhm, Ihn H., 2000. "U.S.-Canada Border Disputes In Grains: Dynamic Interface Between The Free Trade Agreement And Trade Remedy Laws," Agricultural Economics Reports 23267, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Satyanarayana, Vidyashankara & Wilson, William W. & Johnson, D. Demcey & Dooley, Frank J., 1996. "World Malt And Malting Barley: Competition, Marketing, And Trade," Agricultural Economics Reports 23444, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    2. Schmitz, Troy G. & Koo, Won W., 1996. "An Economic Analysis Of International Feed And Malting Barley Markets: An Econometric Spatial Oligopolistic Approach," Agricultural Economics Reports 23286, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    3. Johnson, D. Demcey & Wilson, William W., 1995. "Competition And Policy Conflicts In Canada-U.S. Barley Trade," Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Western Agricultural Economics Association, vol. 20(01), pages 1-18, July.
    4. Johnson, D. Demcey & Wilson, William W., 1994. "North American Barley Trade and Competition," Agricultural Economics Reports 23475, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    5. Johnson, D. Demcey, 1999. "Single-Desk Selling Of Canadian Barley: Price Pooling, Price Discrimination, And Systemic Costs," Agricultural Economics Reports 23251, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    6. Carter, Colin A., 1995. "Understanding The Canada/United States Grains Dispute: Factors And Impacts," Proceedings of the 1st Agricultural and Food Policy Systems Information Workshop, 1995: Understanding Canada\United States Grain Disputes 16745, Farm Foundation, Agricultural and Food Policy Systems Information Workshops.
    7. Wilson, William W. & Johnson, D. Demcey, 1995. "Understanding The Canadian/United States Grains Dispute: Background And Description," Proceedings of the 1st Agricultural and Food Policy Systems Information Workshop, 1995: Understanding Canada\United States Grain Disputes 16737, Farm Foundation, Agricultural and Food Policy Systems Information Workshops.
    8. Stiegert, Kyle W. & Wang, Shinn-Shyr, 2003. "Imperfect Competition And Strategic Trade Theory: What Have We Learned," Working Papers 14589, International Agricultural Trade Research Consortium.
    9. Das, Prantika & Gundimeda, Haripriya, 2021. "Economic Evaluation of Achieving Biofuel Mandate through Advanced Biofuels in Developing Country: Case of India," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315355, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. Kropf, Jurgen & Devadoss, Stephen, 1995. "Impacts Of The Uruguay Round On The European Union'S Sugar Market," A.E. Research Series 305135, University of Idaho, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Sociology.
    11. Mustafa TERIN & Fahri YAVUZ, 2017. "A spatial equilibrium analysis for the possible regional impacts of the European Union full membership on the Turkey's dairy industry," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 63(4), pages 185-196.
    12. Johnson, D. Demcey, 1999. "Single Desk Selling Of Canadian Barley," 1999 Annual Meeting, July 11-14, 1999, Fargo, ND 35669, Western Agricultural Economics Association.
    13. Cassidy, P.A. & McCarthy, W.O. & Toft, H.I., 1970. "An Application Of Spatial Analysis To Beef Slaughter Plant Location And Size, Queensland," Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 14(01), pages 1-20, June.
    14. Dorward, Andrew & Morrison, Jamie & Robinson, Sherman & Tchale, Hardwick, 2004. "Differential Household Responses in a Poor Agricultural Economy: Implications for Agricultural Policy Analysis," Conference papers 331282, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    15. Alan Murray & Patricia Gober & Luc Anselin & Sergio Rey & David Sampson & Paul Padegimas & Yin Liu, 2012. "Spatial Optimization Models for Water Supply Allocation," Water Resources Management: An International Journal, Published for the European Water Resources Association (EWRA), Springer;European Water Resources Association (EWRA), vol. 26(8), pages 2243-2257, June.
    16. Kawaguchi, Tsunemasa & Suzuki, Nobuhiro & Kaiser, Harry M., 1996. "A Spatial Equilibrium Model for IDlperfectly CODlpetitive Milk Markets," Research Bulletins 122832, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    17. Bates, Thomas H. & Schmitz, Andrew, 1969. "A Spatial Equilibrium Analysis of the World Sugar Economy," Monographs, University of California, Davis, Giannini Foundation, number 251920.
    18. Mehmet Kucukmehmetoglu & Jean-Michel Guldmann, 2005. "Multi-Objective Programming for the Allocation of Trans-Boundary Water Resources - the Case of the Euphrates and Tigris," ERSA conference papers ersa05p9, European Regional Science Association.
    19. Watson, Alistair S., 1999. "Grain marketing and National Competition Policy: reform or reaction?," Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society, vol. 43(4), pages 1-27, December.
    20. Jansson, Torbjörn & Heckelei, Thomas, 2009. "A new estimator for trade costs and its small sample properties," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 26(2), pages 489-498, March.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:nddaer:23272. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dandsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.