IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/nddaae/23614.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Logistics And Supply Chain Strategies In Grain Exporting

Author

Listed:
  • Wilson, William W.
  • Carlson, Donald C.E.
  • Dahl, Bruce L.

Abstract

During the past decade, the grain shipping industry has become highly competitive and technologically advanced. These changes, along with the introduction of innovative shipping mechanisms, have made logistics management an important source of opportunity and risk for grain shippers. In this study, a stochastic simulation model was developed to evaluate the tradeoffs and effects of key variables on logistical performance in managing the grain supply chain. Average demurrage cost for the supply chain was $2.03 million with the greatest cost being for railcars and the least cost being for barges. Of the stochastic variables modeled, changes in export demand had the greatest impact on demurrage costs.

Suggested Citation

  • Wilson, William W. & Carlson, Donald C.E. & Dahl, Bruce L., 2001. "Logistics And Supply Chain Strategies In Grain Exporting," Agribusiness & Applied Economics Report 23614, North Dakota State University, Department of Agribusiness and Applied Economics.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:nddaae:23614
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.23614
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/23614/files/aer457.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.23614?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hau L. Lee & Corey Billington, 1995. "The Evolution of Supply-Chain-Management Models and Practice at Hewlett-Packard," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 25(5), pages 42-63, October.
    2. William W. Wilson & Bruce L. Dahl, 2000. "Logistical Strategies and Risks in Canadian Grain Marketing," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 48(2), pages 141-160, July.
    3. Caves, Richard E. & Pugel, Thomas A., 1982. "New Evidence on Competition in the Grain Trade," Food Research Institute Studies, Stanford University, Food Research Institute, vol. 18(3), pages 1-14.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Gustafson, Cole R., 2003. "Costs of Producing for an Identity-Preserved (IP) Grain Market: A Case Study," Journal of the ASFMRA, American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers, vol. 2003, pages 1-10.
    2. Gleim, Savannah & Nolan, James, 2015. "Canada’s Grain Handling and Transportation System: A GIS-based Evaluation of Potential Policy Changes," Journal of the Transportation Research Forum, Transportation Research Forum, vol. 54(3).
    3. Garima & Doina Olaru & Brett Smith & Kadambot H. M. Siddique, 2024. "Decision-Making in Grain Supply Chains for Sustainable Food System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(24), pages 1-21, December.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Philip C. Abbott & Panu K. S. Kallio, 1996. "Implications of Game Theory for International Agricultural Trade," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 78(3), pages 738-744.
    2. Zhenying Zhao & Michael Ball & Masahiro Kotake, 2005. "Optimization-Based Available-To-Promise with Multi-Stage Resource Availability," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 135(1), pages 65-85, March.
    3. Khalid Al-Shuaibi, 2016. "Reaping the Benefits of Long Term Relationship with Suppliers: An Evidence from the Saudi Chemical Industry," International Journal of Business and Management, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 11(8), pages 203-203, July.
    4. Judit Oláh & Attila Bai & György Karmazin & Péter Balogh & József Popp, 2017. "The Role Played by Trust and Its Effect on the Competiveness of Logistics Service Providers in Hungary," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(12), pages 1-22, December.
    5. Patterson, Paul M & Abbott, Philip C, 1994. "Further Evidence on Competition in the US Grain Export Trade," Journal of Industrial Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(4), pages 429-437, December.
    6. Crespo Marquez, Adolfo & Bianchi, Carmine & Gupta, Jatinder N. D., 2004. "Operational and financial effectiveness of e-collaboration tools in supply chain integration," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 159(2), pages 348-363, December.
    7. Sneha Kumari & Shirish Jeble & V. G. Venkatesh & Chandrasekaran Nagarajan & Yangyan Shi, 2023. "Antecedents of agriculture supply chain performance during COVID-19: an emerging economy perspective," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 489-510, March.
    8. Charles L. Munson & Jianli Hu & Meir J. Rosenblatt, 2003. "Teaching the Costs of Uncoordinated Supply Chains," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 33(3), pages 24-39, June.
    9. Lawrence C. Leung & Gang Chen & Yer Van Hui & Wen He, 2016. "An Airfreight Forwarder’s Shipment Bidding and Logistics Planning," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(1), pages 275-287, February.
    10. Morris A. Cohen & Suman Mallik, 1997. "Global Supply Chains: Research And Applications," Production and Operations Management, Production and Operations Management Society, vol. 6(3), pages 193-210, September.
    11. Johnson, Mark & Mena, Carlos, 2008. "Supply chain management for servitised products: A multi-industry case study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(1), pages 27-39, July.
    12. Mark Nissen, 2000. "Agent‐based supply chain disintermediation versus re‐intermediation: economic and technological perspectives," Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance and Management, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 9(4), pages 237-256, December.
    13. D. MacLaren, 1991. "Agricultural Trade Policy Analysis And International Trade Theory: A Review Of Recent Developments," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(3), pages 250-297, September.
    14. Mustapha Ouhimmou & Sophie D'Amours & Robert Beauregard & Daoud Ait-Kadi & Satyaveer Singh Chauhan, 2009. "Optimization Helps Shermag Gain Competitive Edge," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 39(4), pages 329-345, August.
    15. Ernst, Dieter, 1997. "From Partial to Systemic Globalization: International Production Networks in the Electronics Industry," UCAIS Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy, Working Paper Series qt7326w69k, UCAIS Berkeley Roundtable on the International Economy, UC Berkeley.
    16. Wang, Juite & Shu, Yun-Feng, 2007. "A possibilistic decision model for new product supply chain design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 177(2), pages 1044-1061, March.
    17. Scoppola, Margherita, 1996. "Entreprises multinationales et politiques nationales sur les marchés agricoles mondiaux," Économie rurale, French Society of Rural Economics (SFER Société Française d'Economie Rurale), vol. 234.
    18. Claude Laval & Marc Feyhl & Steve Kakouros, 2005. "Hewlett-Packard Combined OR and Expert Knowledge to Design Its Supply Chains," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 35(3), pages 238-247, June.
    19. Vikram Tiwari & Srinagesh Gavirneni, 2007. "ASP, The Art and Science of Practice: Recoupling Inventory Control Research and Practice: Guidelines for Achieving Synergy," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 37(2), pages 176-186, April.
    20. W. Mark Brown & Shon M. Ferguson & Crina Viju‐Miljusevic, 2020. "Farm Size, Technology Adoption and Agricultural Trade Reform: Evidence from Canada," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 71(3), pages 676-697, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Industrial Organization;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:nddaae:23614. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dandsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.