IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/ilrirr/182877.html

Scavenging Poultry for Poverty Alleviation: A review of experiences with a focus on Bangladesh

Author

Listed:
  • Islam, S M Fakhrul
  • Jabbar, Mohammad A.

Abstract

Smallholder poultry as a tool for poverty alleviation has been developed and widely applied in Bangladesh. In this paper, the evolution of the model has been summarized and studies conducted to assess the impact of the poultry model at various stages of its evolution have been critically reviewed. The results indicate that the project has reached the poor though not always ultra poor, the main target of the model, and that participants have benefited positively in terms of income, consumption and nutrition, empowerment of women. However, the results need to be assessed with a high degree of caution because of several methodological limitations of the impact studies. These limitations have been illustrated and suggestions have made for more objective assessment of impact of past projects and for conducting additional research for supporting smallholder poultry as a tool for poverty alleviation.

Suggested Citation

  • Islam, S M Fakhrul & Jabbar, Mohammad A., 2003. "Scavenging Poultry for Poverty Alleviation: A review of experiences with a focus on Bangladesh," Research Reports 182877, International Livestock Research Institute.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:ilrirr:182877
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.182877
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/182877/files/2003-Review%20of%20smallholder%20Poultry%20in%20Bangladesh.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.182877?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Biggs, Stephen D. & Clay, Edward J., 1981. "Sources of innovation in agricultural technology," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 9(4), pages 321-336, April.
    2. M.A. Jabbar & M.A. Mohamed Saleem & Solomon Gebreselassie & Hailu Beyene, 2003. "Role of knowledge in the adoption of new agricultural technologies: an approach and an application," International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, Inderscience Enterprises Ltd, vol. 2(3/4), pages 312-327.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jabbar, Mohammad A. & Islam, S.M.F. & Delgado, C. & Ehui, Simeon K. & Akanda, M.A.I. & Khan, M.I. & Kamruzzaman, M., 2005. "Policy and scale factors influencing efficiency in dairy and poultry production in Bangladesh," Research Reports 182868, International Livestock Research Institute.
    2. Jabbar, Mohammad A. & Sere, C, 2004. "Family Poultry Production: The Potential Contribution Of International Research," Research Reports 182874, International Livestock Research Institute.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Tambo, Justice A. & Wünscher, Tobias, 2016. "Beyond adoption: welfare effects of farmer innovation behavior in Ghana," Discussion Papers 235297, University of Bonn, Center for Development Research (ZEF).
    2. Bhatia R., 1987. "Diffusion of renewable energy technologies in India: a case study of Biogas dual-fuel engines," ILO Working Papers 992590763402676, International Labour Organization.
    3. Letty, Brigid & Shezi, Zanele & Mudhara, Maxwell, 2012. "An exploration of agricultural grassroots innovation in South Africa and implications for innovation indicator development," MERIT Working Papers 2012-023, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    4. Colleen M. Eidt & Laxmi P. Pant & Gordon M. Hickey, 2020. "Platform, Participation, and Power: How Dominant and Minority Stakeholders Shape Agricultural Innovation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(2), pages 1-21, January.
    5. Volker Hoffmann & Kirsten Probst & Anja Christinck, 2007. "Farmers and researchers: How can collaborative advantages be created in participatory research and technology development?," Agriculture and Human Values, Springer;The Agriculture, Food, & Human Values Society (AFHVS), vol. 24(3), pages 355-368, September.
    6. repec:ilo:ilowps:288229 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. Hall, A., 2004. "New patterns of partnership in agricultural research in Africa: institutional lessons from SMIP," IWMI Working Papers H038337, International Water Management Institute.
    8. repec:ilo:ilowps:259076 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Foran, Tira & Butler, James R.A. & Williams, Liana J. & Wanjura, Wolf J. & Hall, Andy & Carter, Lucy & Carberry, Peter S., 2014. "Taking Complexity in Food Systems Seriously: An Interdisciplinary Analysis," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 85-101.
    10. Alauddin M. & Mujeri MK. & Tisdell CA., 1992. "Technology-environment-employment linkages and the rural poor of Bangladesh: insights from farm-level data," ILO Working Papers 992882293402676, International Labour Organization.
    11. Silvia Silvestri & Martin Macharia & Bellancile Uzayisenga, 2019. "Analysing the potential of plant clinics to boost crop protection in Rwanda through adoption of IPM: the case of maize and maize stem borers," Food Security: The Science, Sociology and Economics of Food Production and Access to Food, Springer;The International Society for Plant Pathology, vol. 11(2), pages 301-315, April.
    12. Suci Wulandari & Fadjry Djufry & Renato Villano, 2022. "Coping Strategies of Smallholder Coffee Farmers under the COVID-19 Impact in Indonesia," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-18, May.
    13. Hall, Andrew & Rasheed Sulaiman, V. & Clark, Norman & Yoganand, B., 2003. "From measuring impact to learning institutional lessons: an innovation systems perspective on improving the management of international agricultural research," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 78(2), pages 213-241, November.
    14. Gass, Graham & Biggs, Stephen & Kelly, Aiden, 1997. "Stakeholders, science and decision making for poverty-focused rural mechanization research and development," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 25(1), pages 115-126, January.
    15. Canales Medina, Elizabeth & Bergtold, Jason S. & Williams, Jeffery R., "undated". "Modeling the factors affecting farmers’ timing of adoption of in-field conservation cropping practices," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 258558, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    16. Hall, Andrew & Bockett, Geoffrey & Taylor, Sarah & Sivamohan, M. V. K . & Clark, Norman, 2001. "Why Research Partnerships Really Matter: Innovation Theory, Institutional Arrangements and Implications for Developing New Technology for the Poor," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 29(5), pages 783-797, May.
    17. Jabbar, M.A. & Ziauddin, A.T.M. & Abedin, M.Z., . "Impact Of An Agricultural Development Project On Technology Adoption And Crop Yields Of Resource Poor Farmers In Bangladesh," Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Economics, Bangladesh Agricultural University, vol. 34(01-2), pages 55-75.
    18. Biggs SD. & Clay EJ., 1983. "Generation and diffusion of agricultural technology: a review of theories and experiences," ILO Working Papers 992260213402676, International Labour Organization.
    19. Raina, Rajeswari S., 2003. "Disciplines, institutions and organizations: impact assessments in context," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 78(2), pages 185-211, November.
    20. Hall, Andy, 2007. "The origins and implications of using innovation systems perspectives in the design and implementation of agricultural research projects: Some personal observations," MERIT Working Papers 2007-013, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    21. Alyson Warhurst, 1985. "Biotechnology for Mining: The Potential of an Emerging Technology, the Andean Pact Copper Project and Some Policy Implications," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 16(1), pages 93-121, January.
    22. Jabbar, Mohammad A & Ziauddin, A T M & Abedin, M Zainul, 2010. "Towards improving food security and sustainable livelihoods of resource poor farmers in Bangladesh: Impact of the FoSHoL project," Research Reports 208731, International Livestock Research Institute.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:ilrirr:182877. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/ilrinke.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.