IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/iaae18/277445.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Financial Stimulus And Performance of the Commercial Agricultural Credit Scheme (CACS) in Nigeria

Author

Listed:
  • Olomola, A.

Abstract

This study sought to determine the impact of the financial capital intervention (stimulus to the banking sector) on credit flow to the agricultural sector using random-effects Tobit econometric technique and proffer suggestions for improved participation of the banking sector in agricultural financing in Nigeria. The results show that loan supply is higher for banks that are younger and bigger in size and that it is significantly higher under the commercial agricultural credit scheme (CACS) than before; implying that the financial stimulus have elicited significantly positive response from the commercial banks. Prior to CACS rising borrowers risk was associated with higher probability of loan supply whereas under CACS risk-taking by commercial banks has been moderated due to regulatory interventions by the CBN including intensive monitoring and enforcement of operational guidelines. Commercial banks do not increase agricultural lending due to higher leverage, greater liquidity and wider network of branches. They do so because of access to off-balance sheet resources. If their performance must increase as expected, public spending on infrastructural development must also increase. And to sustain the CACS, tapping alternative sources of funds such as the pension fund, accumulated funds in CACS repayment account, sugar levy account etc. is strongly recommended. Acknowledgement : Grateful acknowledgement is due to the International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI) for its financial support for this study. The administrative support of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) in granting access to the required data is highly appreciated. In particular, I owe a debt of gratitude to the officials of the Development Finance Deparment of the CBN and Agricultural Finance Departments of the Deposit Money Banks for their cooperation during the data collection exercise for this study.

Suggested Citation

  • Olomola, A., 2018. "Financial Stimulus And Performance of the Commercial Agricultural Credit Scheme (CACS) in Nigeria," 2018 Conference, July 28-August 2, 2018, Vancouver, British Columbia 277445, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:iaae18:277445
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.277445
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/277445/files/590.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.277445?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Berger, Allen N. & Bouwman, Christa H.S., 2013. "How does capital affect bank performance during financial crises?," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 109(1), pages 146-176.
    2. Berger, A.N. & Bouwman, C.H.S. & Kick, T. & Schaeck, K., 2011. "Bank Risk Taking and Liquidity Creation Following Regulatory Interventions and Capital Support," Other publications TiSEM 22c97f78-b2e8-48a0-a1fd-f, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    3. Thakor, Anjan V, 1996. "Capital Requirements, Monetary Policy, and Aggregate Bank Lending: Theory and Empirical Evidence," Journal of Finance, American Finance Association, vol. 51(1), pages 279-324, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Bruno R. Arthur & Monika K. Rabarison, 2018. "Deposit-lending synergies and bank profitability," Journal of Economics and Finance, Springer;Academy of Economics and Finance, vol. 42(4), pages 710-726, October.
    2. 0. De Bandt & B. Camara & P. Pessarossi & M. Rose, 2014. "Does the capital structure affect banks’ profitability? Pre- and post financial crisis evidence from significant banks in France," Débats économiques et financiers 12, Banque de France.
    3. Pierluigi Bologna & Maddalena Galardo, 2022. "Calibrating the countercyclical capital buffer for Italy," Questioni di Economia e Finanza (Occasional Papers) 679, Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area.
    4. Choi, Dong Beom & Eisenbach, Thomas M. & Yorulmazer, Tanju, 2021. "Watering a lemon tree: Heterogeneous risk taking and monetary policy transmission," Journal of Financial Intermediation, Elsevier, vol. 47(C).
    5. Bitar, Mohammad & Pukthuanthong, Kuntara & Walker, Thomas, 2018. "The effect of capital ratios on the risk, efficiency and profitability of banks: Evidence from OECD countries," Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 227-262.
    6. Cathcart, Lara & El-Jahel, Lina & Jabbour, Ravel, 2015. "Can regulators allow banks to set their own capital ratios?," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 53(C), pages 112-123.
    7. Nguyen, Thach Vu Hong & Ahmed, Shamim & Chevapatrakul, Thanaset & Onali, Enrico, 2020. "Do stress tests affect bank liquidity creation?," Journal of Corporate Finance, Elsevier, vol. 64(C).
    8. Allen Berger & Rima Turk-Ariss, 2015. "Do Depositors Discipline Banks and Did Government Actions During the Recent Crisis Reduce this Discipline? An International Perspective," Journal of Financial Services Research, Springer;Western Finance Association, vol. 48(2), pages 103-126, October.
    9. Duchin, Ran & Sosyura, Denis, 2014. "Safer ratios, riskier portfolios: Banks׳ response to government aid," Journal of Financial Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(1), pages 1-28.
    10. Tu D. Q. Le & Dat T. Nguyen, 2020. "Capital Structure and Bank Profitability in Vietnam: A Quantile Regression Approach," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-17, August.
    11. Ghosh, Saibal, 2018. "Governance reforms and performance of MENA banks: Are disclosures effective?," Global Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 78-95.
    12. Bouwman, Christa H. S., 2013. "Liquidity: How Banks Create It and How It Should Be Regulated," Working Papers 13-32, University of Pennsylvania, Wharton School, Weiss Center.
    13. Muhammad Saifuddin Khan, 2018. "The Role of Liquidity in Financial Intermediation," PhD Thesis, Finance Discipline Group, UTS Business School, University of Technology, Sydney, number 1-2018.
    14. Raluca Roman, 2015. "Shareholder activism in banking," Research Working Paper RWP 15-9, Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City.
    15. Allen N. Berger & Sadok El Ghoul & Omrane Guedhami & Raluca A. Roman, 2017. "Internationalization and Bank Risk," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 63(7), pages 2283-2301, July.
    16. Höwer, Daniel, 2016. "The role of bank relationships when firms are financially distressed," Journal of Banking & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 59-75.
    17. Vighneswara Swamy, 2018. "Basel III capital regulations and bank profitability," Review of Financial Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 36(4), pages 307-320, October.
    18. Chen, Sichong, 2013. "How do leverage ratios affect bank share performance during financial crises: The Japanese experience of the late 1990s," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 30(C), pages 1-18.
    19. Boulanouar, Zakaria & Alqahtani, Faisal & Hamdi, Besma, 2021. "Bank ownership, institutional quality and financial stability: evidence from the GCC region," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 66(C).
    20. Nicole Boyson & Jean Helwege & Jan Jindra, 2014. "Crises, Liquidity Shocks, and Fire Sales at Commercial Banks," Financial Management, Financial Management Association International, vol. 43(4), pages 857-884, December.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural Finance;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:iaae18:277445. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iaaeeea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.