IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/huaedp/7177.html

Land Reform, Farm Structure, And Agricultural Performance In Cis Countries

Author

Listed:
  • Lerman, Zvi

Abstract

This article examines the impacts of land reform policies in CIS countries on agricultural performance, including growth and productivity. The focal thesis of the study is that agricultural development in CIS is mainly driven by policy factors, and it is changes in policies (whether agricultural or general economic) that cumulatively affect growth, employment, and productivity in the large rural sector in CIS. The data used in our analysis are taken from an authoritative database that utilizes statistics regularly reported to the Interstate Statistical Committee of the CIS in Moscow by the member countries (CIS 2005). The CIS database covers all the years from 1980 to 2004, and thus provides a useful comparative view of the last decade of the Soviet regime and the 15 years of transition. Some inevitable gaps in the CIS database have been filled in from country yearbooks.
(This abstract was borrowed from another version of this item.)

Suggested Citation

  • Lerman, Zvi, 2007. "Land Reform, Farm Structure, And Agricultural Performance In Cis Countries," Discussion Papers 7177, Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Department of Agricultural Economics and Management.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:huaedp:7177
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.7177
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/7177/files/dp070007.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.7177?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Maryna V. Shashyna & Oleg V. Zakharchenko & Oleksandr V. Darushyn & Zoriana M. Buryk & Maria I. Shpinkovska, 2018. "Agroindustrial Complex in the Eastern European Countries in the Context of Sustainable Development," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 549-562:5.
    2. Xiangdong Guo & Pei Lung & Jianli Sui & Ruiping Zhang & Chao Wang, 2021. "Agricultural Support Policies and China’s Cyclical Evolutionary Path of Agricultural Economic Growth," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-28, May.
    3. repec:arp:tjssrr:2019:p:1167-1180 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Rajag M. Nag & Johannes F. Linn & Harinder S. Kohli (ed.), 2016. "Central Asia 2050: Unleashing the Region's Potential," Books, Emerging Markets Forum, edition 1, number centasia2050, September.
    5. Kurbanov, Zafar & Djanibekov, Nodir & Herzfeld, Thomas, 2025. "Land property rights and investment incentives in movable farm assets: Evidence from post-Soviet Central Asia," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 67(2), pages 396-425.
    6. Csáki, Csaba & Jámbor, Attila, 2018. "Konvergencia vagy divergencia. Merre tart Kelet-Közép-Európa és a FÁK mezőgazdasága? [Convergence versus divergence: Where is agriculture in Central and Eastern Europe and the CIS countries heading?]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(10), pages 1048-1066.
    7. Livia Bizikova & Maria Nijnik & Anatoliy Nijnik, 2015. "Exploring institutional changes in agriculture to inform adaptation planning to climate change in transition countries," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 20(8), pages 1385-1406, December.
    8. Lobanov, Mikhail (Лобанов, Михаил) & Zvezdvanovic-Lobanova, Jelena (Звезданович-Лобанова, Елена), 2017. "Specifics of Agricultural Policy in the Countries of Central-Eastern and South-Eastern Europe in 1990–2010s [Особенности Аграрной Политики В Странах Центрально- И Юго-Восточной Европы В 1990-2010-Х Годах]," Ekonomicheskaya Politika / Economic Policy, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration, vol. 3, pages 150-173, June.
    9. Utkur Djanibekov & Grace B. Villamor & Klara Dzhakypbekova & James Chamberlain & Jianchu Xu, 2016. "Adoption of Sustainable Land Uses in Post-Soviet Central Asia: The Case for Agroforestry," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-16, October.
    10. Petrick, Martin, 2017. "Incentive provision to farm workers in post-socialist settings: evidence from East Germany and North Kazakhstan," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 20(2), pages 239-256.
    11. Nozilakhon Mukhamedova & Richard Pomfret, 2019. "Why Does Sharecropping Survive? Agrarian Institutions and Contract Choice in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan," Comparative Economic Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Association for Comparative Economic Studies, vol. 61(4), pages 576-597, December.
    12. Zvi Lerman, 2017. "Should agricultural employment in transition economies be encouraged?," World of Labour, LISER, pages 328-328, January.
    13. Ayal Kimhi, 2023. "Land Reform and Its Effect on Farm Household Income Inequality: Evidence from Georgia," Economies, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-11, October.
    14. Jan Douwe van der Ploeg, 2016. "Family farming in Europe and Central Asia: history, characteristics, threats and potentials," Working Papers 153, International Policy Centre.
    15. Csaba Csaki & Attila Jambor, 2019. "Convergence or divergence - Transition in agriculture of Central and Eastern Europe and Commonwealth of Independent States revisited," Agricultural Economics, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 65(4), pages 160-174.
    16. Schott, Johanna & Kalatas, Talin & Nercissians, Emilia & Barkmann, Jan & Shelia, Vakhtang, 2016. "The impact of protected areas on local livelihoods in the South Caucasus [Naturschutzgebiete und ihre Auswirkungen auf die Erwerbsquellen der lokalen Anrainerbevölkerung im Südkaukasus]," IAMO Discussion Papers 152, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).
    17. Maxim V. Khatser & Yuliia A. Perehuda & Tatiana M. Korpaniuk & Khrystyna S. Stoliaruk & Irina M. Yepifanova & Oleksandr O. Shpynkovskyi, 2020. "Anti-Crisis Financial and Personnel Management as Key Factors to Provide Effective Development of Eastern European Enterprises in the Agricultural Sector," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(Special 1), pages 166-177.
    18. Levkovych, Inna, 2011. "Der ukrainische Außenhandel mit Produkten der Agrar- und Ernährungswirtschaft: Eine quantitative Analyse aus Sicht traditioneller und neuer Außenhandelstheorien," Studies on the Agricultural and Food Sector in Transition Economies, Leibniz Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO), volume 59, number 109520.
    19. Djanibekov, Nodir & Sommer, Rolf & Djanibekov, Utkur, 2013. "Evaluation of effects of cotton policy changes on land and water use in Uzbekistan: Application of a bio-economic farm model at the level of a water users association," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 1-13.
    20. Richard Pomfret, 2016. "Modernizing Agriculture in Central Asia," Global Journal of Emerging Market Economies, Emerging Markets Forum, vol. 8(2), pages 104-125, May.
    21. Atamanov, Aziz & Van den Berg, Marrit, 2011. "Microeconomic analysis of rural nonfarm activities in the Kyrgyz Republic: What determines participation and returns?," MERIT Working Papers 2011-011, United Nations University - Maastricht Economic and Social Research Institute on Innovation and Technology (MERIT).
    22. Raynold Runganga & Winnie Njoroge & Syden Mishi, 2022. "Restoration of Land Acquired for Resettlement and the Fast-Track Land Reform Programme in Zimbabwe," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(15), pages 1-14, July.
    23. Benešová, Irena & Novotná, Zuzana & Šánová, Petra & Laputková, A., . "Economic Comparison of Agricultural Sector of Eurasian Countries – Is There Any Potential for Development Through Economic Cooperation?," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 8(2), pages 1-13.
    24. Schott, Johanna & Kalatas, Talin & Nercissians, Emilia & Barkmann, Jan & Shelia, Vakhtang, 2016. "The impact of protected areas on local livelihoods in the South Caucasus," IAMO Discussion Papers 234108, Institute of Agricultural Development in Transition Economies (IAMO).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:huaedp:7177. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/agrhuil.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.