IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/eaae08/43856.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

The application of the Water Framework Directive where farmers have alternative water sources

Author

Listed:
  • Dono, Gabriele
  • Severini, Simone

Abstract

This paper evaluates the possible consequences of decreasing in the amount of water provided by the irrigation board to the farms, and increasing in the unitary water charges that the irrigation board applies to the farms. The study has been conducted in a Mediterranean region of southern Italy where farmers can use water delivered by an irrigation board and by privately owned wells. The results of the analysis, performed by means of a mathematical programming model, show that in both cases farmers substitute the water supplied by the irrigation board with that extracted from farm wells. This generates an over-extraction of resources from the aquifer leading to likely negative environmental consequences. This also endangers the economic sustainability of the irrigation boards, which are institutions whose activity can be monitored and influenced by public administration bodies.

Suggested Citation

  • Dono, Gabriele & Severini, Simone, 2008. "The application of the Water Framework Directive where farmers have alternative water sources," 2008 International Congress, August 26-29, 2008, Ghent, Belgium 43856, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:eaae08:43856
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://purl.umn.edu/43856
    Download Restriction: no

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Finger, J M & Kreinin, M E, 1979. "A Measure of 'Export Similarity' and Its Possible Uses," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 89(356), pages 905-912, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Water Framework Directive; farmers behaviour; mathematical programming; Resource /Energy Economics and Policy;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:eaae08:43856. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search). General contact details of provider: http://edirc.repec.org/data/eaaeeea.html .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.