IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/cfcp05/124403.html

Supplying Forest Services and Products from Natural Forests and Plantations: Can We Meet the Challenge?

Author

Listed:
  • Bevege, Ian

Abstract

Sensible and equitable use of the world’s forests while ensuring sustainable delivery of forest-based goods and services devolves upon many interlinked social, economic, environmental and developmental issues. Increasing global population, rising standards of living with concomitant consumption of forest products, and widening expectations of the forests to provide environmental services and regulate water supplies, are placing huge demands on forest resources. While the yield from industrial and fuelwood plantations increasingly complements the harvest of wood products from native forests, the establishment of plantations is not offsetting the current rate of deforestation. Clearing for agriculture, often associated with uncontrolled logging and fuelwood collection, remains the major cause of net forest loss. Conversion of tropical forest to industrial plantations may have negative implications for biodiversity, but positive ones for carbon sequestration and wood production. Harvesting traditional nonwood forest products can have mixed outcomes on the forest, depending on the levels of exploitation and management. The level of exploitation of forest products is determined by need, demand and price. In general, forest commodity prices have steadily dropped over the last several years in line with many other commodity prices. This places pressure on producers to reduce costs, and this pressure is reflected in the level and effectiveness of forest management. Current forest valuation processes tend to ignore the value of forest services and goods other than wood; this leads to a restricted forest policy horizon and undervaluation of forests, and consequently to inappropriate pricing for goods and services and levels of investment in forest management. This situation is reflected in a lack of sectorally-integrated forest policies, rundown forest management authorities and inadequate R&D, and a lack of investment in training of staff. The capacity for ecologically sustainable forest management is inevitably severely compromised. The international development community needs to take stock of what past development assistance in the forest sector has achieved. A paradigm shift is necessary, focussed on governance, forest policy and capacity building if the pressures on forests are to be met and the expectations of the global community realised.

Suggested Citation

  • Bevege, Ian, "undated". "Supplying Forest Services and Products from Natural Forests and Plantations: Can We Meet the Challenge?," 2005: Forests, Wood and Livelihoods: Finding a Future for All, 16 August 2005 124403, Crawford Fund.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:cfcp05:124403
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.124403
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/124403/files/Bevege%202005.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.124403?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Venn, Tyron J., 2005. "Financial and economic performance of long-rotation hardwood plantation investments in Queensland, Australia," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 7(3), pages 437-454, March.
    2. repec:wbk:wbpubs:12426 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Tacconi, Luca & Bennett, Jeffrey W., 1997. "Protected Area Assessment and Establishment in Vanuatu," Monographs, Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research, number 118037.
    4. repec:wbk:wbpubs:12425 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Kant, Shashi, 2003. "Extending the boundaries of forest economics," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 5(1), pages 39-56, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. James Breen & Darragh Clancy & Mary Ryan & M. Wallace, 2010. "Can’t See the Wood for the Trees: The Returns to Farm Forestry in Ireland," Working Papers 1003, Rural Economy and Development Programme,Teagasc.
    2. Maraseni, Tek Narayan & Cockfield, Geoff, 2015. "The financial implications of converting farmland to state-supported environmental plantings in the Darling Downs region, Queensland," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 57-65.
    3. Mermet, Laurent & Farcy, Christine, 2011. "Contexts and concepts of forest planning in a diverse and contradictory world," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 13(5), pages 361-365, June.
    4. Shahi, Chander & Kant, Shashi, 2007. "An evolutionary game-theoretic approach to the strategies of community members under Joint Forest Management regime," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(7), pages 763-775, April.
    5. Wang, Sen & Wilson, Bill, 2007. "Pluralism in the economics of sustainable forest management," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 9(7), pages 743-750, April.
    6. Brian Chi-ang Lin & Siqi Zheng & Xiangzheng Deng & Zhan Wang & Chunhong Zhao, 2016. "Economic Evolution In China Ecologically Fragile Regions," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(3), pages 552-576, July.
    7. von Detten, Roderich, 2003. "Abschied vom Nachhaltigkeitsprinzip? Forstliches Handeln im Angesicht von Unsicherheit und Sinnkrise. Ein Essay," Working Papers 37-2003, University of Freiburg, Chair of Forestry Economics and Planning.
    8. Kline, Jeffrey D. & Mazzotta, Marisa J. & Spies, Thomas A. & Harmon, Mark E., 2013. "Applying the Ecosystem Services Concept to Public Land Management," Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association, vol. 42(01), pages 1-20, April.
    9. Donaghy, Peter & Rolfe, John & Gowen, Rebecca & Bray, Steven & Madonna, Hoffman, 2010. "Assessing the economic impact of an emissions trading scheme on agroforestry in Australia’s northern grazing systems," 2010 Conference (54th), February 10-12, 2010, Adelaide, Australia 59069, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    10. Wang, Sen, 2004. "One hundred faces of sustainable forest management," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 6(3-4), pages 205-213, June.
    11. Kohsaka, Ryo & Flitner, Michael, 2004. "Exploring forest aesthetics using forestry photo contests: case studies examining Japanese and German public preferences," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 6(3-4), pages 289-299, June.
    12. Khan, M. Ali, 2016. "On a forest as a commodity and on commodification in the discipline of forestry," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 7-17.
    13. Tom Green, 2007. "Improving Human Wellbeing and Ecosystem Health on BC’s Coast: The Challenge Posed by Historic Resource Extraction," Journal of Bioeconomics, Springer, vol. 9(3), pages 245-263, December.
    14. Muñoz-Rojas, José & Nijnik, Maria & González-Puente, Marc & Cortines-García, Felipe, 2015. "Synergies and conflicts in the use of policy and planning instruments for implementing forest and woodland corridors and networks; a case study in NE Scotland," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 57(C), pages 47-64.
    15. Sandulescu, Emil & Wagner, John E. & Pailler, Sharon & Floyd, Donald W. & Davis, Craig J., 2007. "Policy analysis of a government-sanctioned management plan for a community-owned forest in Romania," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 10(1-2), pages 14-24, December.
    16. Kant, Shashi, 2004. "Economics of sustainable forest management," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 6(3-4), pages 197-203, June.
    17. Bennett, Jeffrey W., 1999. "Estimating The Benefits Of Biodiversity Protection," 1999 Conference (43th), January 20-22, 1999, Christchurch, New Zealand 123767, Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society.
    18. Mpekiri, Sofia & Papaspyropoulos, Konstantinos G., 2026. "Citation dynamics, thematic structure and temporal evolution of research on the Faustmann Forest Economics model (1962–2025)," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    19. Centre for International Economics, 1998. "Establishment of a protected area in Vanuatu," Impact Assessment Series (IAS) 47192, Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research.
    20. Kumar, Pradeep & Kant, Shashi, 2019. "Endogenous time preferences of forest goods and community-based forest management," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 205-214.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:cfcp05:124403. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.crawfordfund.org/ .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.