IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/cenrep/264959.html

Productivity in Piece-Rate Labor Markets: Evidence from Rural Malawi

Author

Listed:
  • Guiteras, Raymond P.
  • Jack, B. Kelsey

Abstract

Piece-rate compensation is a common feature of developing country labor markets, but little is known about how piece-rate workers respond to incentives, or the tradeoffs that an employer faces when setting the terms of the contract. In a field experiment in rural Malawi, we hired casual day laborers at piece rates and collected detailed data on the quantity and quality of their output. Specifically, we use a simplified Becker-DeGroot-Marschak mechanism, which provides random variation in piece rates conditional on revealed reservation rates, to separately identify the effects of worker selection and incentives on output. We find a positive relationship between output quantity and the piece rate, and show that this is solely the result of the incentive effect, not selection. In addition, we randomized whether workers were subject to stringent quality monitoring. Monitoring led to higher quality output, at some cost to the quantity produced. However, workers do not demand higher compensation when monitored, and monitoring has no measurable effect on the quality of workers willing to work under a given piece rate. Together, the set of worker responses that we document lead the employer to prefer a contract that offers little surplus to the worker, consistent with an equilibrium in which workers have little bargaining power.

Suggested Citation

  • Guiteras, Raymond P. & Jack, B. Kelsey, "undated". "Productivity in Piece-Rate Labor Markets: Evidence from Rural Malawi," CEnREP Working Papers 264959, North Carolina State University, Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:cenrep:264959
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.264959
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/264959/files/WP-2017-019.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/264959/files/WP-2017-019.pdf?subformat=pdfa
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.264959?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Other versions of this item:

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Jack, B. Kelsey & McDermott, Kathryn & Sautmann, Anja, 2022. "Multiple price lists for willingness to pay elicitation," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 159(C).
    3. Dike, Onyemaechi, 2019. "Informal employment and work health risks: Evidence from Cambodia," MPRA Paper 92943, University Library of Munich, Germany, revised 24 Mar 2019.
    4. Luc Behaghel & Karen Macours & Julie Subervie, 2018. "Can RCTs help improve the design of CAP," Working Papers hal-01974425, HAL.
    5. Zou, Fei & Yang, Mei & Zhou, Yanju & Deng, Yaling & Xie, Baiwei, 2024. "Goal-gradient point rewards can increase consumers' willingness to purchase poverty-alleviating products," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    6. Luc Behaghel & Karen Macours & Julie Subervie, 2019. "How can randomised controlled trials help improve the design of the common agricultural policy?," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 46(3), pages 473-493.
    7. Jin, Zhangfeng & Pan, Shiyuan, 2020. "Incentive Pay and Firm Productivity: Evidence from China," GLO Discussion Paper Series 479, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    8. Karlan, Dean & Banerjee, Abhijit & Trachtman, Hannah & Udry, Christopher, 2020. "Does Poverty Change Labor Supply? Evidence from Multiple Income Effects and 115,579 Bags," CEPR Discussion Papers 14812, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    9. Francesco Amodio & Miguel A. Martinez-Carrasco, 2019. "Inputs, Incentives, and Self-selection at the Workplace," Cahiers de recherche 13-2019, Centre interuniversitaire de recherche en économie quantitative, CIREQ.
    10. Francesco Amodio & Miguel A. Martinez-Carrasco, 2023. "Workplace Incentives and Organizational Learning," Journal of Labor Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 41(2), pages 453-478.
    11. Ling Zhu & Dongmin Kong, 2023. "Revenue pressure of local governments and firm productivity: Evidence from a natural experiment in China," Economics of Transition and Institutional Change, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 721-748, July.
    12. Hyuncheol Bryant Kim & Hyunseob Kim & John Zhu, 2022. "The Selection Effects of Part-Time Work: Experimental Evidence from a Large-Scale Recruitment Drive," Working Paper Series WP 2022-51, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago.
    13. Alexandra E. Hill & Timothy K. M. Beatty, 2024. "Evidence on quality spillovers from speed enhancing policies in the workplace," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 62(4), pages 1520-1538, October.
    14. Ku, Hyejin, 2019. "The effect of wage subsidies on piece rate workers: Evidence from the Penny Per Pound program in Florida," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 122-134.
    15. Hyuncheol Bryant Kim & Seonghoon Kim & Thomas T. Kim, 2020. "The Role of Career and Wage Incentives in Labor Productivity: Evidence from a Two-Stage Field Experiment in Malawi," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 102(5), pages 839-851, December.
    16. Krah, Kwabena & Michelson, Hope & Perge, Emilie & Jindal, Rohit, 2019. "Constraints to adopting soil fertility management practices in Malawi: A choice experiment approach," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 1-1.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    JEL classification:

    • C93 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Design of Experiments - - - Field Experiments
    • J22 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Time Allocation and Labor Supply
    • J24 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Demand and Supply of Labor - - - Human Capital; Skills; Occupational Choice; Labor Productivity
    • J33 - Labor and Demographic Economics - - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs - - - Compensation Packages; Payment Methods
    • O12 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Microeconomic Analyses of Economic Development

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:cenrep:264959. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/dancsus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.