IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aesc17/258620.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

Effects of using cover crops in the inter-rows of vineyards. An ex-ante evaluation in France

Author

Listed:
  • Plaas, Elke
  • Schütte, Rebekka

Abstract

The European Union is one of the world’s leading wine producers and exporters. European vineyards are smaller than in other wine producing countries and are cultivated more labour-intensively. However, this economic disadvantage can become a benefit for supporting biodiversity and ecosystem services in vinicultural landscapes. Using cover crops in vineyards is a practice to reduce soil erosion and potentially enhance biodiversity. Field trials in VineDivers have shown this across a European transect (France, Austria, Spain and Romania). We analyzed the competitiveness of French wine from the Layon region on world markets with different field sites scenarios using a Policy Analysis Matrix (PAM). For this purpose we took into account revenues and costs of grape production. Our results show that viniculture in Layon is competitive in the worldwide market but it is under pressure due to regulations to protect the wine production in French wine-regions. The regional value creation in producing high quality wine with a more environmental friendly production enables the vintners to earn higher profits.

Suggested Citation

  • Plaas, Elke & Schütte, Rebekka, 2017. "Effects of using cover crops in the inter-rows of vineyards. An ex-ante evaluation in France," 91st Annual Conference, April 24-26, 2017, Royal Dublin Society, Dublin, Ireland 258620, Agricultural Economics Society.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aesc17:258620
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.258620
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/258620/files/Elke_Plaas_2017%20Plaas%20Schuette%20final.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.258620?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Traversac, Jean-Baptiste & Rousset, Sylvain & Perrier-Cornet, Philippe, 2011. "Farm resources, transaction costs and forward integration in agriculture: Evidence from French wine producers," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 36(6), pages 839-847.
    2. William A. Masters & Alex Winter-Nelson, 1995. "Measuring the Comparative Advantage of Agricultural Activities: Domestic Resource Costs and the Social Cost-Benefit Ratio," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 77(2), pages 243-250.
    3. Fatah, Fazleen Abdul & Cramon-Taubadel, Stephan Von, 2017. "Profitability and Competitiveness of Rice Farming in Malaysia: A Policy Analysis Matrix," Asian Journal of Agriculture and Development, Southeast Asian Regional Center for Graduate Study and Research in Agriculture (SEARCA), vol. 14(2), December.
    4. J. van Zyl & C. J. van Rooyen & J. F. Kirsten & H. D. van Schalkwyk, 1994. "Land reform in south africa: Options to consider for the future," Journal of International Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 6(2), pages 219-239, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. World Bank, 2008. "Ukraine Agricultural Competitiveness," World Bank Publications - Reports 19478, The World Bank Group.
    2. Mutambatsere, Emelly, 2006. "Trade Policy Reforms in the Cereals Sector of the SADC Region: Implications on Food Security," Working Papers 127055, Cornell University, Department of Applied Economics and Management.
    3. Waqar Akhtar & Muhammad Sharif & Nadeem Akmal, 2007. "Analysis of Economic Efficiency and Competitiveness of the Rice Production Systems of Pakistan’s Punjab," Lahore Journal of Economics, Department of Economics, The Lahore School of Economics, vol. 12(1), pages 141-153, Jan-Jun.
    4. Max Zongyuan Shang & Ken McEwan, 2021. "The make‐or‐buy decision of feed on livestock farms: Evidence from Ontario swine farms," Canadian Journal of Agricultural Economics/Revue canadienne d'agroeconomie, Canadian Agricultural Economics Society/Societe canadienne d'agroeconomie, vol. 69(3), pages 353-368, September.
    5. Babu, Suresh Chandra & Shishodia, Mahika, 2017. "Agribusiness competitiveness: Applying analytics, typology, and measurements to Africa," IFPRI discussion papers 1648, International Food Policy Research Institute (IFPRI).
    6. Adeoye, I.B. & Oni, O.A., 2014. "Competitiveness and Effects of Policies on Plantain Production Systems in Southwestern Nigeria," AGRIS on-line Papers in Economics and Informatics, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Economics and Management, vol. 6(4), pages 1-11, December.
    7. Poizat, Axelle & Duvaleix-Treguer, Sabine & Bonnet-Beaugrand, Florence, 2018. "Vertical integration and health control measures in the French young bull sector," Working Papers 273145, Institut National de la recherche Agronomique (INRA), Departement Sciences Sociales, Agriculture et Alimentation, Espace et Environnement (SAE2).
    8. Magali Aubert & Geoffroy Enjolras, 2017. "Which Incentives for Direct Selling?," Post-Print hal-01685408, HAL.
    9. Abdou, Amin I., 2015. "Npr - Interference Of Localized Production Specialization With Economic Determinants Of Cropping Patterns: A Case Study Of Some Major Export Crops In Egypt," 20th Congress, Quebec, Canada, 2015 345753, International Farm Management Association.
    10. van Zyl, Johan & Binswanger, Hans & Thirtle, Colin, 1995. "The relationship between farm size and efficiency in South African agriculture," Policy Research Working Paper Series 1548, The World Bank.
    11. Eicher, Carl K. & Rukuni, Mandivamba, 1996. "Reflections On Agrarian Reform And Capacity Building In South Africa," Staff Paper Series 11703, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    12. Mahlanza, B. & Mendes, E. & Vink, Nick, 2003. "Comparative advantage of organic wheat production in the Western Cape," Agrekon, Agricultural Economics Association of South Africa (AEASA), vol. 42(2), pages 1-19, June.
    13. Marius Chevallier & Julien Dellier & Gaël Plumecocq & Frédéric Richard, 2014. "Dynamiques et structuration des circuits courts agroalimentaires en Limousin : distance institutionnelle, proximités spatiale et relationnelle," Géographie, économie, société, Lavoisier, vol. 16(3), pages 339-362.
    14. Fazleen, Abdul & Stephan, Von Cramon, 2015. "The Policy Analysis Matrix of Profitability and Competitiveness of Rice Farming in Malaysia," 2015 Conference, August 9-14, 2015, Milan, Italy 210872, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    15. Sudawan Somjai & Thitinan Chankoson & Kittisak Jermsittiparsert, 2020. "An economic analysis of agricultural production function on the paddy fields of Thailand," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(3), pages 2012-2025, March.
    16. S. A. Sabur & M.A. Monayem Miah & M. Esmat Ara Begum & M. Shahrukh Rahman & M. M. Uddin Molla, 2021. "Demand, Supply And Reasons For Price Hike Of Potato In Bangladesh," Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Economics, Bangladesh Agricultural University, vol. 42(1), June.
    17. Axelle Poizat & Sabine Duvaleix-Treguer & Florence Bonnet-Beaugrand, 2018. "Vertical integration and health control measures in the French young beef bull sector," Working Papers SMART 18-04, INRAE UMR SMART.
    18. Touré, Ali A. & Groenewald, Jan & Seck, Papa Abdoulaye & Diagne, Aliou, 2013. "Analysing policy-induced effects on irrigated rice performance," 2013 Fourth International Conference, September 22-25, 2013, Hammamet, Tunisia 160288, African Association of Agricultural Economists (AAAE).
    19. Erokhin, Vasilii & Ivolga, Anna & Lazareva, Natalia & Germanova, Victoria & Igonina, Elena & Sofin, Alexander, 2024. "China—Eastern Europe Agricultural Trade: (Dis)Advantages and Policy Responses," Research on World Agricultural Economy, Nan Yang Academy of Sciences Pte Ltd (NASS), vol. 5(2), June.
    20. Muhammad A. Quddus & Usman Mustafa, 2011. "Comparative Advantage of Major Crops Production in Punjab: An Application of Policy Analysis Matrix," Lahore Journal of Economics, Department of Economics, The Lahore School of Economics, vol. 16(1), pages 63-94, Jan-Jun.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Agricultural and Food Policy; Crop Production/Industries; Environmental Economics and Policy; International Relations/Trade;
    All these keywords.

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aesc17:258620. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aesukea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.