IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea26/404717.html

When Subsidies Arrive Late: Payment Delays and Agricultural Technology Adoption

Author

Listed:
  • Xu, Chenguang
  • Chao, Zenghui
  • Gu, Wenhao
  • Zhang, Jun

Abstract

Using a novel transaction plant-protection UAV data in China, this paper examines how agricultural subsidy payment delays affect agricultural technology adoption. The analysis estimates zero-truncated Poisson correlated random effects models with spatial Durbin extensions. Global and Local Moran's I tests show significant spatial clustering in UAV adoption. In the preferred spatial Durbin zero-truncated Poisson model, subsidy payment delay significantly reduces local plant-protection UAV adoption. This negative effect holds after controlling for spatial dependence and county characteristics. The control function approach further addresses potential endogeneity, and the result remains stable. Adoption is constrained on both the extensive margin and the intensive margin. Heterogeneity analysis shows that the delay effect is not uniform across counties. The negative impact is stronger in counties with lower lagged fiscal expenditure, smaller grain sown area, and higher GDP per capita. The study emphasizes that timely delivery of payments is just as important as the subsidy's nominal value or eligibility rules.

Suggested Citation

  • Xu, Chenguang & Chao, Zenghui & Gu, Wenhao & Zhang, Jun, 2026. "When Subsidies Arrive Late: Payment Delays and Agricultural Technology Adoption," 2026 Annual Meeting, July 26 - 28, 2026, Kansas City, Missouri 404717, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea26:404717
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.404717
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/404717/files/177654_193735_115232_When_Subsidies_Arrive_Late_Payment_Delays_and_Agricultural_Technology_Adoption.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.404717?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Erik Lichtenberg & David Zilberman, 1986. "The Econometrics of Damage Control: Why Specification Matters," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 68(2), pages 261-273.
    2. Bazzi, Samuel & Sumarto, Sudarno & Suryahadi, Asep, 2015. "It's all in the timing: Cash transfers and consumption smoothing in a developing country," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 267-288.
    3. Aker, Jenny C. & Ksoll, Christopher, 2016. "Can mobile phones improve agricultural outcomes? Evidence from a randomized experiment in Niger," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 44-51.
    4. Atanu Saha & C. Richard Shumway & Arthur Havenner, 1997. "The Economics and Econometrics of Damage Control," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 79(3), pages 773-785.
    5. Robert Evenson & Prabhu Pingali (ed.), 2007. "Handbook of Agricultural Economics," Handbook of Agricultural Economics, Elsevier, edition 1, volume 3, number 1.
    6. Carlos Alberto Belchior & Yara Gomes, 2022. "Liquidity constraints, cash transfers and the demand for health care in the Covid‐19 pandemic," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(11), pages 2369-2380, November.
    7. Zhang, Hangyu & Song, Yujing & Wang, Yue & Huang, Jikun, 2026. "Refining pesticide use to reduce yield loss: How drone plant protection transforms smallholder pest management," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 139(C).
    8. Robert Jensen, 2007. "The Digital Provide: Information (Technology), Market Performance, and Welfare in the South Indian Fisheries Sector," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 122(3), pages 879-924.
    9. Jenny C. Aker, 2010. "Information from Markets Near and Far: Mobile Phones and Agricultural Markets in Niger," American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, American Economic Association, vol. 2(3), pages 46-59, July.
    10. Schimmelpfennig, David, 2016. "Farm Profits and Adoption of Precision Agriculture," Economic Research Report 249773, United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service.
    11. Megan Sheahan & Christopher B. Barrett & Casey Goldvale, 2017. "Human health and pesticide use in Sub-Saharan Africa," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 48(S1), pages 27-41, November.
    12. Li, Junpeng & Ma, Wanglin & Shen, Bowen & Li, Longwei, 2025. "Can unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) adoption reduce pesticide use and enhance yields? Evidence from mountainous rice farming in Yunnan, China," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Alain de Janvry & Elisabeth Sadoulet, 2019. "Transforming developing country agriculture: Removing adoption constraints and promoting inclusive value chain development," Working Papers hal-02287668, HAL.
    2. Gershom Endelani Mwalupaso & Shangao Wang & Sanzidur Rahman & Essiagnon John-Philippe Alavo & Xu Tian, 2019. "Agricultural Informatization and Technical Efficiency in Maize Production in Zambia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-17, April.
    3. Yi Cai & Wene Qi & Famin Yi, 2023. "Smartphone use and willingness to adopt digital pest and disease management: Evidence from litchi growers in rural China," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 39(1), pages 131-147, January.
    4. Sekabira, Haruna & Qaim, Matin, 2017. "Can mobile phones improve gender equality and nutrition? Panel data evidence from farm households in Uganda," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 73(C), pages 95-103.
    5. Wouter Zant, 2017. "Impact of Mobile Phones on Staple Food Markets in Mozambique: Improved Arbitrage or Increased Rent Extraction?," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 17-021/V, Tinbergen Institute, revised 26 Jan 2018.
    6. de Janvry, Alain & Sadoulet, Elisabeth, 2020. "Using agriculture for development: Supply- and demand-side approaches," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    7. Svenja Fluhrer & Kati Kraehnert, 2024. "Mobile phone network expansion and agricultural income: A panel study," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 55(1), pages 54-85, January.
    8. Matous, Petr, 2017. "Complementarity and substitution between physical and virtual travel for instrumental information sharing in remote rural regions: A social network approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 61-79.
    9. Wouter Zant, 2019. "Mobile Phones and Mozambique Traders: What is the Size of Reduced Search Costs and Who Benefits?," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 19-047/V, Tinbergen Institute.
    10. Gershom Endelani Mwalupaso & Shangao Wang & Zhangxing Xu & Xu Tian, 2019. "Towards Auspicious Agricultural Informatization—Implication of Farmers’ Behavioral Intention Apropos of Mobile Phone Use in Agriculture," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(22), pages 1-21, November.
    11. Zant, Wouter, 2024. "Mobile phones and Mozambique farmers: Less asymmetric information and more trader competition?," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    12. Pallavi Rajkhowa & Heike Baumüller, 2024. "Assessing the potential of ICT to increase land and labour productivity in agriculture: Global and regional perspectives," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 75(2), pages 477-503, June.
    13. Evans, Olaniyi, 2018. "Digital Agriculture: Mobile Phones, Internet & Agricultural Development in Africa," MPRA Paper 90359, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Min, Shi & Liu, Min & Huang, Jikun, 2020. "Does the application of ICTs facilitate rural economic transformation in China? Empirical evidence from the use of smartphones among farmers," Journal of Asian Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    15. Bjorn Van Campenhout, 2022. "ICTs to address information inefficiencies in food supply chains," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 53(6), pages 968-975, November.
    16. Camacho, Adriana & Conover, Emily, 2019. "The impact of receiving SMS price and weather information on small scale farmers in Colombia," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 1-1.
    17. Tisorn Songsermsawas & Kathy Baylis & Ashwini Chhatre & Hope Michelson, 2014. "Can Peers Improve Agricultural Productivity?," CESifo Working Paper Series 4958, CESifo.
    18. Zant, Wouter, 2023. "Mobile Phones and Mozambique Traders: Size, Composition and Distribution of Reduced Transaction Costs," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    19. Campenhout, Bjorn Van, 2021. "ICTs to Address Information Inefficiencies in Food Supply Chains," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 315054, International Association of Agricultural Economists.
    20. Campenhout, Bjorn Van, 2021. "ICTs to Address Information Inefficiencies in Food Supply Chains," 2021 Conference, August 17-31, 2021, Virtual 313801, International Association of Agricultural Economists.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea26:404717. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.