IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea26/404428.html

Thinking Fast and Slow about Food: Health, Environmental Impacts, and Choice of Pulse-Based Foods

Author

Listed:
  • Sapkota, Sushil
  • Gustafson, Christopher
  • Gitungwa, Henriette
  • Rose, Devin

Abstract

Pulses provide well-documented health and environmental benefits, yet remain underconsumed. In fact, pulses are a critical element in the movement to shift diets towards plant-based foods to improve human and environmental health: they are both a protein food and a vegetable food. While surveys and choice experiments show significant percentages of consumers interested in pulse-containing foods, sales data do not reflect these claims. A potential explanation is that simple research environments eliminate cognitive or search costs for attributes that constitute a small percentage of products. Recent work on rational inattention theory predicts that these costs will lead decision-makers to limit the set of items/information they consider. In the food retail environments, attention is likely to be driven by individual priorities (e.g., taste, health, price sensitivity, etc.). To examine these mechanisms, we conducted an online experiment with 831 U.S. adults in which participants selected foods in large product sets (50 items/category) across six product categories under two pulse-prevalence conditions (10% vs. 20% of products). Immediately after completing the food choices, participants completed an ecological momentary assessment-style question capturing what they were actively thinking about while making food choices. They then rated how important taste, food prices, healthiness, and environmental impact are when making food choices. Mixed-effects logit and mediation analyses indicate that both environmental and health importance ratings are positively associated with pulse product selection. Environmental importance also exhibits a statistically significant indirect effect through active consideration of environment during choice, while the indirect pathway through active consideration of health is not statistically significant. Increasing pulse prevalence more than doubles the odds of choosing pulses without affecting self-reported consideration. Overall, the findings suggest that policies highlighting environmental attributes while increasing the availability of pulse-based products may be particularly effective in encouraging sustainable food choices, as they target both attention to sustainability information and the accessibility of sustainable options.

Suggested Citation

  • Sapkota, Sushil & Gustafson, Christopher & Gitungwa, Henriette & Rose, Devin, 2026. "Thinking Fast and Slow about Food: Health, Environmental Impacts, and Choice of Pulse-Based Foods," 2026 Annual Meeting, July 26 - 28, 2026, Kansas City, Missouri 404428, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
  • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea26:404428
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.404428
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/404428/files/177500_194762_115232_FinalActive_ConsiderationAAEA2026_SCS.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.404428?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel M. Bartels & Oleg Urminsky, 2015. "To Know and to Care: How Awareness and Valuation of the Future Jointly Shape Consumer Spending," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 41(6), pages 1469-1485.
    2. David Tilman & Michael Clark, 2014. "Global diets link environmental sustainability and human health," Nature, Nature, vol. 515(7528), pages 518-522, November.
    3. David Laibson, 1997. "Golden Eggs and Hyperbolic Discounting," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 112(2), pages 443-478.
    4. Bates, Douglas & Mächler, Martin & Bolker, Ben & Walker, Steve, 2015. "Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 67(i01).
    5. Raquel Carrasco & José M. Labeaga & J. David López-Salido, 2005. "Consumption and Habits: Evidence from Panel Data," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 115(500), pages 144-165, January.
    6. Helen Harwatt & Joan Sabaté & Gidon Eshel & Sam Soret & William Ripple, 2017. "Substituting beans for beef as a contribution toward US climate change targets," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 143(1), pages 261-270, July.
    7. Nijdam, Durk & Rood, Trudy & Westhoek, Henk, 2012. "The price of protein: Review of land use and carbon footprints from life cycle assessments of animal food products and their substitutes," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 760-770.
    8. Shane Frederick & George Loewenstein & Ted O'Donoghue, 2002. "Time Discounting and Time Preference: A Critical Review," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 40(2), pages 351-401, June.
    9. Meißner, Martin & Oppewal, Harmen & Huber, Joel, 2020. "Surprising adaptivity to set size changes in multi-attribute repeated choice tasks," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 163-175.
    10. Ted O'Donoghue & Matthew Rabin, 2015. "Present Bias: Lessons Learned and to Be Learned," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 105(5), pages 273-279, May.
    11. Wiktor L. Adamowicz & Joffre D. Swait, 2013. "Are Food Choices Really Habitual? Integrating Habits, Variety-seeking, and Compensatory Choice in a Utility-maximizing Framework," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 95(1), pages 17-41.
    12. Stefano DellaVigna, 2009. "Psychology and Economics: Evidence from the Field," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 47(2), pages 315-372, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Orazio P. Attanasio & Guglielmo Weber, 2010. "Consumption and Saving: Models of Intertemporal Allocation and Their Implications for Public Policy," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 48(3), pages 693-751, September.
    2. S. Basiglio & A. Ricci & M. Rossi, 2025. "Entrepreneurs’ impatience and digital technologies," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 64(4), pages 2035-2060, April.
    3. Tim Friehe & Christoph Rößler & Xiaoge Dong, 2020. "Liability for Third-Party Harm When Harm-Inflicting Consumers Are Present Biased," American Law and Economics Review, American Law and Economics Association, vol. 22(1), pages 75-104.
    4. Kovács, Kármen, 2020. "A jelen felé torzított preferenciák. A türelmetlenségből eredő fogyasztási döntések okai, megnyilvánulásai és következményei [The causes, manifestations and consequences of consumption decisions resulting from impatience due to present-biased pref," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(1), pages 31-53.
    5. Aubery, Frederic & Buisson, Marie-Charlotte, 2024. "Making ends meet in refugee camps: Food distribution cycles, consumption and undernutrition," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    6. Koichi Futagami & Yuta Nakabo, 2021. "Capital accumulation game with quasi-geometric discounting and consumption externalities," Economic Theory, Springer;Society for the Advancement of Economic Theory (SAET), vol. 71(1), pages 251-281, February.
    7. Belton, Cameron A. & Robertson, Deirdre A. & Lunn, Peter D., 2022. "An experimental approach to measuring consumer preferences for water charges," Utilities Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C).
    8. Mihm, Maximilian & Ozbek, Kemal, 2019. "On the identification of changing tastes," Games and Economic Behavior, Elsevier, vol. 116(C), pages 203-216.
    9. Eduard Marinov, 2017. "The 2017 Nobel Prize in Economics," Economic Thought journal, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences - Economic Research Institute, issue 6, pages 117-159.
    10. Nobel Prize Committee, 2017. "Richard H. Thaler: Integrating Economics with Psychology," Nobel Prize in Economics documents 2017-1, Nobel Prize Committee.
    11. Francisco Cabo & Guiomar Martín-Herrán & María Pilar Martínez-García, 2020. "Non-constant Discounting, Social Welfare and Endogenous Growth with Pollution Externalities," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 76(2), pages 369-403, July.
    12. De Paola, Maria & Scoppa, Vincenzo, 2015. "Procrastination, academic success and the effectiveness of a remedial program," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 217-236.
    13. Minwook Kang & Lei Wang, 2019. "Pareto criterion and long-term perspective criterion under myopic discounting," Economics Bulletin, AccessEcon, vol. 39(1), pages 24-32.
    14. Alexander M. Danzer & Helen Zeidler, 2024. "Present Bias in Choices over Food and Money," CESifo Working Paper Series 11454, CESifo.
    15. Vincent P. Crawford, 2013. "Boundedly Rational versus Optimization-Based Models of Strategic Thinking and Learning in Games," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 51(2), pages 512-527, June.
    16. Fabian Arnold & Amir Ashour Novirdoust & Philipp Theile, 2025. "Environmental Policy Instruments for Investments in Backstop Technologies Under Present Bias - An Application to the Building Sector," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 88(4), pages 1039-1070, April.
    17. Häckel, Björn & Pfosser, Stefan & Tränkler, Timm, 2017. "Explaining the energy efficiency gap - Expected Utility Theory versus Cumulative Prospect Theory," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 414-426.
    18. Pagel, Michaela, 2013. "Expectations-Based Reference-Dependent Life-Cycle Consumption," MPRA Paper 47138, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    19. Camilo Hernández & Dylan Possamaï, 2024. "Time‐inconsistent contract theory," Mathematical Finance, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(3), pages 1022-1085, July.
    20. James Alm & Carolyn J. Bourdeaux, 2013. "Applying Behavioral Economics to the Public Sector," Hacienda Pública Española / Review of Public Economics, IEF, vol. 206(3), pages 91-134, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea26:404428. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.