IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea25/361034.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

How Do Trade Agreements Shape Agricultural Export Patterns? The Case of Mercosur

Author

Listed:
  • Gomes Da Silva, Raphael
  • Nogueira, Lia

Abstract

Mercosur is the largest trading bloc in South America. It was formed in 1991 by Argentina, Brazil, Paraguay, and Uruguay. Mercosur is known for its abundant natural resources, extensive land area, and favorable climate, which contribute significantly to its agricultural sector. Mercosur’s primary goal of promoting regional integration in South America has been pursued through trade agreements with neighboring countries. These agreements seek to reduce or eliminate tariff and non-tariff barriers within the bloc. By lowering barriers, these agreements can increase existing trade and encourage the exchange of less-traded goods. This study investigates the impact of Mercosur’s trade agreements with Chile (1996), Bolivia (1997), Peru (2005), and Colombia and Ecuador (2005) on the agricultural sector. We assess whether these agreements have expanded Mercosur’s agricultural exports and promoted diversification. We use a structural gravity model to analyze these outcomes, accounting for the phased implementation of each agreement. Our findings indicate that while trade agreements have significantly increased trade in manufacturing goods, their effect on agricultural trade has been minimal.

Suggested Citation

  • Gomes Da Silva, Raphael & Nogueira, Lia, 2025. "How Do Trade Agreements Shape Agricultural Export Patterns? The Case of Mercosur," 2025 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2025, Denver, CO 361034, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea25:361034
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.361034
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/361034/files/75281_104378_105300_Article_AAEA.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.361034?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Leamer, Edward E, 1987. "Paths of Development in the Three-Factor, n-Good General Equilibrium Model," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 95(5), pages 961-999, October.
    2. repec:oup:ecpoli:v:23:y:2008:i::p:5-49 is not listed on IDEAS
    3. Lectard, Pauline & Rougier, Eric, 2018. "Can Developing Countries Gain from Defying Comparative Advantage? Distance to Comparative Advantage, Export Diversification and Sophistication, and the Dynamics of Specialization," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 90-110.
    4. Baier, Scott L. & Bergstrand, Jeffrey H., 2007. "Do free trade agreements actually increase members' international trade?," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 71(1), pages 72-95, March.
    5. Peter K. Schott, 2008. "The relative sophistication of Chinese exports [‘Manufacturing Earnings and Compensation in China’]," Economic Policy, CEPR, CESifo, Sciences Po;CES;MSH, vol. 23(53), pages 6-49.
    6. Lectard, Pauline & Rougier, Eric, 2018. "Can Developing Countries Gain from Defying Comparative Advantage? Distance to Comparative Advantage, Export Diversification and Sophistication, and the Dynamics of Specialization," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 90-110.
    7. repec:bla:ecpoli:v:23:y:2008:i::p:5-49 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Lin Sun & Michael R. Reed, 2010. "Impacts of Free Trade Agreements on Agricultural Trade Creation and Trade Diversion," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 92(5), pages 1351-1363.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Naima Chrid & Sami Saafi & Mohamed Chakroun, 2021. "Export Upgrading and Economic Growth: a Panel Cointegration and Causality Analysis," Journal of the Knowledge Economy, Springer;Portland International Center for Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), vol. 12(2), pages 811-841, June.
    2. Faheem Ur Rehman & Ejaz Ahmad & Muhammad Asif Khan & József Popp & Judit Oláh, 2021. "Does Trade Related Sectoral Infrastructure Make Chinese Exports More Sophisticated and Diversified?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-21, May.
    3. Parteka, Aleksandra & Zarach, Zuzanna Helena & Kordalska, Aleksandra, 2025. "Technological content of export diversification—Evolution along the economic growth process," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 14-27.
    4. Burak Sencer Atasoy, 2021. "The determinants of export sophistication: Does digitalization matter?," International Journal of Finance & Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(4), pages 5135-5159, October.
    5. Lectard, Pauline, 2023. "Manufacturing exports: A virtuous circle of industrialization or a lock-in development pattern? The case of the machinery and textiles sectors," Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 319-338.
    6. Ryan Abman & Clark Lundberg & Michele Ruta, 2024. "The Effectiveness of Environmental Provisions in Regional Trade Agreements," Journal of the European Economic Association, European Economic Association, vol. 22(6), pages 2507-2548.
    7. Yue Teng & Dic Lo, 2019. "Determinants of Developing Countries' Export Upgrading: The Role of China and Productive Investment," Working Papers 227, Department of Economics, SOAS University of London, UK.
    8. Bahar, Dany & Rosenow, Samuel & Stein, Ernesto & Wagner, Rodrigo, 2019. "Export take-offs and acceleration: Unpacking cross-sector linkages in the evolution of comparative advantage," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 48-60.
    9. Permani, Risti & Xu, Xing, 2020. "The Nexus between Natural disasters, Supply Chains and Trade – Revisiting the Role of FTAs in Disaster Risk Reduction," 2020 Annual Meeting, July 26-28, Kansas City, Missouri 304269, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    10. Margarida Bandeira Morais & Julia Swart & Jacob Arie Jordaan, 2021. "Economic Complexity and Inequality: Does Regional Productive Structure Affect Income Inequality in Brazilian States?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-23, January.
    11. Chen, Rui & Adu, Derick T. & Li, Wenying & Wilson, Norbert L.W., 2024. "Virtual water trade: Does bilateral tariff matter?," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    12. Angela Cheptea & Lionel Fontagné & Soledad Zignago, 2014. "European export performance," Review of World Economics (Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv), Springer;Institut für Weltwirtschaft (Kiel Institute for the World Economy), vol. 150(1), pages 25-58, February.
    13. Jason H. Grant & Kathryn A. Boys, 2012. "Agricultural Trade and the GATT/WTO: Does Membership Make a Difference?," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 94(1), pages 1-24.
    14. Lectard, Pauline & Rougier, Eric, 2018. "Can Developing Countries Gain from Defying Comparative Advantage? Distance to Comparative Advantage, Export Diversification and Sophistication, and the Dynamics of Specialization," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 102(C), pages 90-110.
    15. Fabio Gaetano Santeramo & Emilia Lamonaca, 2022. "Standards and regulatory cooperation in regional trade agreements: What the effects on trade?," Applied Economic Perspectives and Policy, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 44(4), pages 1682-1701, December.
    16. Ni, Guohua & Teng, Man & Su, Bin & Chen, Zhenling, 2024. "Impact of political relationships on virtual land flow from China's food trade," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 96(C).
    17. Jason H. Grant, 2013. "Is the growth of regionalism as significant as the headlines suggest? Lessons from agricultural trade," Agricultural Economics, International Association of Agricultural Economists, vol. 44(1), pages 93-109, January.
    18. Marie M Stack & Rob Ackrill & Martin Bliss, 2019. "Sugar trade and the role of historical colonial linkages," European Review of Agricultural Economics, Oxford University Press and the European Agricultural and Applied Economics Publications Foundation, vol. 46(1), pages 79-108.
    19. Yoke Fong Kong & Richard Kneller, 2016. "Measuring the Impact of China's Export Growth on its Asian Neighbours," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 39(2), pages 195-220, February.
    20. Mario Larch & Jeff Luckstead & Yoto V. Yotov, 2024. "Economic sanctions and agricultural trade," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 106(4), pages 1477-1517, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea25:361034. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.