IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea25/361031.html

Global Chains, Regional Pains: The Local Socio-Economic Effects of U.S. Tariffs

Author

Listed:
  • Simonato, Thiago
  • van der Mensbrugghe, Dominique
  • Chepeliev, Maksym

Abstract

This paper investigates how recent and potential changes in U.S. trade policy affect regional economic performance, labor markets, and income inequality across Brazil, using an integrated global-subnational computable general equilibrium (CGE) framework. The analysis combines the Global Trade Analysis Project (GTAP) model with Brazil’s highly disaggregated subnational TERM (The Enormous Regional Model), providing a novel methodological approach to capture detailed spatial and sectoral impacts of international trade shocks. Empirical findings reveal substantial regional heterogeneity in economic outcomes, with pronounced vulnerabilities in the North and Northeast, contrasting milder effects or even gains in more diversified southern regions. Labor market responses were similarly uneven, characterized by heightened informality and concentrated losses in high-skill, trade-dependent occupations. Agriculture, particularly soybean production, emerges as a critical transmission channel, reflecting Brazil’s deep integration into China-led global value chains. Income and consumption impacts are regressive, disproportionately affecting lower-income households. These results underscore the importance of accounting for subnational heterogeneity and global value chain interactions when designing compensatory and adjustment policies. Effective policy interventions thus require spatially targeted mechanisms to mitigate adverse regional and distributional effects while leveraging strategic sectoral opportunities arising from trade realignments.

Suggested Citation

  • Simonato, Thiago & van der Mensbrugghe, Dominique & Chepeliev, Maksym, 2025. "Global Chains, Regional Pains: The Local Socio-Economic Effects of U.S. Tariffs," 2025 AAEA & WAEA Joint Annual Meeting, July 27-29, 2025, Denver, CO 361031, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea25:361031
    DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.361031
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/361031/files/tariffs_brazil_TS.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.22004/ag.econ.361031?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Mauricio Bittencourt & Donald Larson & David Kraybill, 2010. "Regional Short-Run Effects Of Trade Liberalization In Brazil," Economic Systems Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(1), pages 65-85.
    2. Gene M. Grossman & Esteban Rossi-Hansberg, 2008. "Trading Tasks: A Simple Theory of Offshoring," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 98(5), pages 1978-1997, December.
    3. Hertel, Thomas W. & Maros Ivanic & Paul Preckel & John Cranfield, 2004. "The Earnings Effects of Multilateral Trade Liberalization: Implications for Poverty in Developing Countries," GTAP Working Papers 1208, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University.
    4. Hertel, Thomas W. & Maros Ivanic & Paul Preckel & John Cranfield, 2004. "The Earnings Effects of Multilateral Trade Liberalization: Implications for Poverty in Developing Countries," GTAP Working Papers 1208, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Department of Agricultural Economics, Purdue University.
    5. Nicita, Alessandro, 2009. "The price effect of tariff liberalization: Measuring the impact on household welfare," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(1), pages 19-27, May.
    6. Maloney, William F, 1999. "Does Informality Imply Segmentation in Urban Labor Markets? Evidence from Sectoral Transitions in Mexico," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 13(2), pages 275-302, May.
    7. Elhanan Helpman & Paul Krugman, 1987. "Market Structure and Foreign Trade: Increasing Returns, Imperfect Competition, and the International Economy," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 026258087x, December.
    8. Mary Amiti & Stephen J. Redding & David E. Weinstein, 2019. "The Impact of the 2018 Tariffs on Prices and Welfare," Journal of Economic Perspectives, American Economic Association, vol. 33(4), pages 187-210, Fall.
    9. Anderson, Edward, 2020. "The impact of trade liberalisation on poverty and inequality: Evidence from CGE models," Journal of Policy Modeling, Elsevier, vol. 42(6), pages 1208-1227.
    10. Thomas W. Hertel & Maros Ivanic & Paul V. Preckel & John A. L. Cranfield, 2004. "The Earnings Effects of Multilateral Trade Liberalization: Implications for Poverty," The World Bank Economic Review, World Bank, vol. 18(2), pages 205-236.
    11. Ferreira Filho & Horridge, Mark & Joaquim Bento de Souza, 2009. "Would Trade Liberalization Help the Poor of Brazil?," Agricultural Distortions Working Paper Series 52795, World Bank.
    12. Fields, Gary S., 2011. "Labor market analysis for developing countries," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(S1), pages 16-22.
    13. Krugman, Paul, 1991. "Increasing Returns and Economic Geography," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 99(3), pages 483-499, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kym Anderson, 2005. "On the Virtues of Multilateral Trade Negotiations," The Economic Record, The Economic Society of Australia, vol. 81(255), pages 414-438, December.
    2. Joseph Francis Francois & Hugo ROJAS-ROMAGOSA, 2008. "Equity and International Trade," Economics working papers 2008-14, Department of Economics, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Austria.
    3. Gnangnon, Sèna Kimm, 2021. "Effect of Multilateral Trade Liberalization on Services Export Diversification," EconStor Preprints 229152, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics.
    4. Krause, Michael & Lotze-Campen, Hermann & Popp, Alexander, 2009. "Global cropland conversion in a spatially-explicit scenario on available land in an integrated modelling framework," Conference papers 331849, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    5. Qian, Sida & Song, Yan & Zhang, Ming & Hu, Hanbing & Zhang, Wenhao, 2025. "Evaluating the economic and social benefits of global energy interconnection based on GTAP model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 335(C).
    6. José M. Gaspar, 2018. "A prospective review on New Economic Geography," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 61(2), pages 237-272, September.
    7. Carmen Fillat & Joseph Francois, 2004. "National and international income dispersion and aggregate expenditures," Documentos de Trabajo dt2004-06, Facultad de Ciencias Económicas y Empresariales, Universidad de Zaragoza.
    8. Sèna Kimm Gnangnon, 2021. "Exchange rate pressure, fiscal redistribution and poverty in developing countries," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 54(4), pages 1173-1203, November.
    9. Hussein, Zekarias & Golub, Alla A. & Hertel, Thomas W., 2012. "Climate Change Mitigation Policies and Global Poverty," 2012 Annual Meeting, August 12-14, 2012, Seattle, Washington 124689, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    10. Valenzuela, Ernesto & Hertel, Thomas W. & Ivanic, Maros & Pratt, Alejandro Nin, 2004. "Evaluating Poverty Impacts of Globalization and Trade Policy Changes on Agricultural Producers," Conference papers 331307, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    11. Müller, Tobias, 2004. "Evaluating the economic effects of income security reforms in Switzerland: an integrated microsimulation - computable general equilibrium approach," MPRA Paper 111919, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    12. Sulamaa, Pekka & Widgrén, Mika, 2005. "Asian Regionalism versus Global Free Trade: A Simulation Study on Economic Effects," Discussion Papers 985, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy.
    13. Tabeau, Andrzej & Woltjer, Geert, 2010. "Modeling the agricultural employment development within the CGE framework: the consequences for policy responses," Conference papers 332007, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    14. Surabhi Mittal, 2007. "OECD Agricultural Trade Reforms Impact on India's Prices and Producers Welfare," Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi Working Papers 195, Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New Delhi, India.
    15. Tambunan, Tulus, 2006. "Likely Impact of the WTO “July Package” 2004 Agreement on Trade Liberalization in Agriculture on Poverty in Indonesia: A Comparative Study Between A Partial Equilibrium Model and Existing CGE/GTAP Bas," Conference papers 331451, Purdue University, Center for Global Trade Analysis, Global Trade Analysis Project.
    16. Margaret Chitiga & Tonia Kandiero & Ramos Mabugu, 2005. "Computable General Equilibrium Micro-Simulation Analysis of the Impact of Trade Policies on Poverty in Zimbabwe," Working Papers MPIA 2005-01, PEP-MPIA.
    17. Charlie Karlsson & Gunther Maier & Michaela Trippl & Iulia Siedschlag & Gavin Murphy, 2010. "ICT and Regional Economic Dynamics: A Literature Review," JRC Research Reports JRC59920, Joint Research Centre.
    18. -, 2010. "Comercio, pobreza y políticas complementarias en América Latina," Documentos de Proyectos 3807, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    19. González, Cynthia & Arce, Lucas & Masi, Fernando & Servín, Belén & Setrini, Gustavo, 2010. "Comercio y pobreza en Paraguay: el caso de una cadena de valor agroindustrial," Documentos de Proyectos 3817, Naciones Unidas Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
    20. Bussolo, Maurizio & Niimi, Yoko, 2009. "Do Regional Trade Pacts Benefit the Poor? An Illustration from Dominican Republic--Central American Free Trade Agreement in Nicaragua," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 37(1), pages 146-160, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;

    NEP fields

    This paper has been announced in the following NEP Reports:

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea25:361031. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.