IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/ags/aaea23/335934.html

Impact of Non-Tariff Measures on Agri-Food Trade: Quantitative and Qualitative Regulatory Differences

Author

Listed:
  • Akune, Yuko

Abstract

No abstract is available for this item.

Suggested Citation

  • Akune, Yuko, 2023. "Impact of Non-Tariff Measures on Agri-Food Trade: Quantitative and Qualitative Regulatory Differences," 2023 Annual Meeting, July 23-25, Washington D.C. 335934, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    • Handle: RePEc:ags:aaea23:335934
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/335934/files/26880.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jaffe, Adam B, 1986. "Technological Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms' Patents, Profits, and Market Value," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 76(5), pages 984-1001, December.
    2. Redding, Stephen & Venables, Anthony J., 2004. "Economic geography and international inequality," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(1), pages 53-82, January.
    3. Niven Winchester & Marie-Luise Rau & Christian Goetz & Bruno Larue & Tsunehiro Otsuki & Karl Shutes & Christine Wieck & Heloisa L. Burnquist & Maurício J. Pinto de Souza & Rosane Nunes de Faria, 2012. "The Impact of Regulatory Heterogeneity on Agri-food Trade," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 35(8), pages 973-993, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Chen, Rui & Wilson, Norbert L.W., "undated". "The Impact of Regulatory Similarity on the Seafood Trade," 2017 Annual Meeting, July 30-August 1, Chicago, Illinois 259204, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association.
    2. Nabeshima, Kaoru & Obashi, Ayako & Kim, Kunhyui, 2021. "Impacts of additional compliance requirements of regulations on the margins of trade," Japan and the World Economy, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    3. DeMaria, Federica & Lubello, Pasquale & Drogué, Sophie, . "Measuring the complexity of complying with phytosanitary standard: the case of French and Chilean fresh apples," Bio-based and Applied Economics Journal, Italian Association of Agricultural and Applied Economics (AIEAA), vol. 7(01).
    4. repec:ags:aaea22:335934 is not listed on IDEAS
    5. Drogué, Sophie & DeMaria, Federica, 2012. "Pesticide residues and trade, the apple of discord?," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(6), pages 641-649.
    6. Jesús López-Rodríguez & Andrés Faíña, 2007. "Regional Wage Disparities in Europe: What role for Market Access?," INVESTIGACIONES REGIONALES - Journal of REGIONAL RESEARCH, Asociación Española de Ciencia Regional, issue 11, pages 5-23.
    7. Jesús López-Rodríguez & J. Andrés Faíña, 2000. "Regional Income Disparities in Europe: What Role for Location?," Regional and Urban Modeling 283600059, EcoMod.
    8. Nabeshima, Kaoru & Obashi, Ayako, 2021. "Impact of Regulatory Burdens on International Trade," Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, Elsevier, vol. 59(C).
    9. Choi, Jong Woo & Yue, Chengyan, . "Investigating the impact of maximum residue limit standards on the vegetable trade in Japan," International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, International Food and Agribusiness Management Association, vol. 20(01).
    10. Markus Eberhardt & Dietrich Vollrath, 2014. "Agricultural Technology and Structural Change," CSAE Working Paper Series 2014-21, Centre for the Study of African Economies, University of Oxford.
    11. Jason Li-Ying & Yuandi Wang & Lutao Ning, 2016. "How do dynamic capabilities transform external technologies into firms’ renewed technological resources? – A mediation model," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 33(4), pages 1009-1036, December.
    12. repec:ehl:lserod:22334 is not listed on IDEAS
    13. Chang-Yang Lee & Ji-Hwan Lee & Ajai S. Gaur, 2017. "Are large business groups conducive to industry innovation? The moderating role of technological appropriability," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 34(2), pages 313-337, June.
    14. Charbel Macdissi & Syoum Negassi, 2002. "International R&D Spillovers: An Empirical Study," Economics of Innovation and New Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 11(2), pages 77-91.
    15. Malik, Tariq H. & Wang, Yanmei & He, Yifan, 2026. "Civil-military technology proximity and disclosure balance for the civilian Firm's Performance: A comparative study," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    16. Fatima Olanike Kareem & Bernhard Brümmer & Inmaculada Martinez-Zarzoso, 2017. "European Union Market Access Conditions and Africa's Extensive Margin of Food Trade," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 40(10), pages 2277-2300, October.
    17. McNamee, Robert C., 2013. "Can’t see the forest for the leaves: Similarity and distance measures for hierarchical taxonomies with a patent classification example," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 855-873.
    18. Jeremiah Harris & Ralph Siebert, 2015. "Driven by the Discount Factor: Impact of Mergers on Market Performance in the Semiconductor Industry," CESifo Working Paper Series 5199, CESifo.
    19. Fors, Gunnar & Zejan, Mario, 1996. "Overseas R&D by Multinationals in foreign Centers of Excellence," SSE/EFI Working Paper Series in Economics and Finance 111, Stockholm School of Economics.
    20. Joan R Rosés & Nikolaus Wolf, 2021. "Regional growth and inequality in the long-run: Europe, 1900–2015," Oxford Review of Economic Policy, Oxford University Press and Oxford Review of Economic Policy Limited, vol. 37(1), pages 17-48.
    21. Zheye Wang & Yeqing Cheng & Xinyue Ye & Y. H. Dennis Wei, 2016. "Analyzing the Space–Time Dynamics of Innovation in China: ESDA and Spatial Panel Approaches," Growth and Change, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(1), pages 111-129, March.
    22. Bao, Yuting & Pan, Tianxing, 2025. "Close to star organizations promotes exploratory innovation for latecomers," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 201(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea23:335934. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: AgEcon Search (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/aaeaaea.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.