Risk Analysis of Organic Cropping Systems in Minnesota
When all strategies received conventional market prices, 4-year cropping sequences had greater net returns than 2-year sequences, and the organic input, 4-year strategy had the highest net return. Adding 50% of the estimated organic premium, the 4-year, organic strategy dominated all low- and high-purchased input strategies.
|Date of creation:||2001|
|Contact details of provider:|| Postal: 555 East Wells Street, Suite 1100, Milwaukee, Wisconsin 53202|
Phone: (414) 918-3190
Fax: (414) 276-3349
Web page: http://www.aaea.org
More information through EDIRC
References listed on IDEAS
Please report citation or reference errors to , or , if you are the registered author of the cited work, log in to your RePEc Author Service profile, click on "citations" and make appropriate adjustments.:
- Olson, Kent D. & Westman, Lorin L. & Nordquist, Dale W., 1998.
"1997 Annual Report Of The Southeastern Minnesota Farm Business Management Association,"
13310, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
- Olson, Kent D. & Weness, Erlin J. & Christensen, James L. & Anderson, Robert D. & Fales, Perry A. & Nordquist, Dale W., 1998. "1997 Annual Report Of The Southwestern Minnesota Farm Business Management Association," Staff Papers 13476, University of Minnesota, Department of Applied Economics.
- Klonsky, Karen & Tourte, Laura & Thompson, Gary D. & Lohr, Luanne & Krissoff, Barry, 1998. "Emergence Of U.S. Organic Agriculture: Can We Compete?," Faculty Series 16704, University of Georgia, Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics.
- Penelope L. Diebel & Jeffery R. Williams & Richard V. Llewelyn, 1995. "An Economic Comparison of Conventional and Alternative Cropping Systems for a Representative Northeast Kansas Farm," Review of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 17(3), pages 323-335. Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ags:aaea01:20691. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (AgEcon Search)
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.
If the full references list an item that is present in RePEc, but the system did not link to it, you can help with this form.
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.