IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/p/adv/wpaper/200616.html
   My bibliography  Save this paper

El Impacto Distributivo de la Política Fiscal en Bolivia

Author

Listed:
  • Osvaldo Nina

    (Grupo Integral)

Abstract

El estudio tiene la finalidad de analizar la incidencia del gasto social y del sistema tributario sobre la distribución del ingreso en Bolivia para la gestión 2004. El análisis está basado en la Encuesta Continua de Hogares (ECH), que fue realizada en el periodo noviembre 2003-noviembre 2004. Las variaciones en el índice de Gini revelan que la política fiscal provoca leves efectos distributivos positivos. Esta mejora en la distribución de los ingresos de los hogares es producto del impacto positivo del gasto social corriente. El impacto de los impuestos sobre la distribución es imperceptible. Las curvas e índice de concentración evidencian que la distribución de los impuestos y los gastos sociales son regresivos. Por una parte, la mitad de los impuestos es progresiva y la otra es regresiva en relación a la distribución del ingreso, aunque predomina la asignación regresiva. Por otra, los gastos sociales son progresivos en relación a la distribución del ingreso. La mejora en la distribución del ingreso de los hogares deberá provenir de una mayor equidad en la asignación del gasto social. Esto significaría que se debería construir criterios de asignación que tengan por objetivo final la disminución de la desigualdad, y por ende, de la pobreza. El régimen tributario puede contribuir a la mejora de la distribución, pero se lo deberá considerar como un instrumento que facilite la permanencia de la política de gasto público social. En ese sentido, el análisis en general muestra que la redistribución del ingreso a través de la política fiscal es baja.

Suggested Citation

  • Osvaldo Nina, 2006. "El Impacto Distributivo de la Política Fiscal en Bolivia," Development Research Working Paper Series 16/2006, Institute for Advanced Development Studies.
  • Handle: RePEc:adv:wpaper:200616
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.inesad.edu.bo/pdf/wp16_2006.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Milanovic, Branko, 1997. "A simple way to calculate the Gini coefficient, and some implications," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 56(1), pages 45-49, September.
    2. Eduardo Engel & Alexander Galetovic & Claudio Raddatz, 1998. "Reforma tributaria y distribución del ingreso en Chile," Documentos de Trabajo 40, Centro de Economía Aplicada, Universidad de Chile.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. repec:aru:wpaper:201304 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Sara Torregrosa Hetland, 2015. "Did democracy bring redistribution? Insights from the Spanish tax system, 1960–90," European Review of Economic History, Oxford University Press, vol. 19(3), pages 294-315.
    3. Sara Torregrosa Hetland, 2014. "A fiscal revolution? Progressivity in the Spanish tax system, 1960-1990," Working Papers 2014/8, Institut d'Economia de Barcelona (IEB).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Osvaldo Nina & Esteban Nina, 2004. "El Efecto Redistributivo de los Impuestos y del Gasto Social Corriente en Bolivia," Development Research Working Paper Series 05/2004, Institute for Advanced Development Studies.
    2. Ogwang, Tomson, 2007. "Additional properties of a linear pen's parade for individual data using the stochastic approach to the Gini index," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 96(3), pages 369-374, September.
    3. repec:cuf:journl:y:2014:v:15:i:2:calderon:serven is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Stéphane Mussard & J. Sadefo Kamdem & Françoise Seyte & Michel Terraza, 2011. "Quadratic Pen'S Parade And The Computation Of The Gini Index," Review of Income and Wealth, International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, vol. 57(3), pages 583-587, September.
    5. Esmaiel Abounoori & Patrick McCloughan, 2003. "A simple way to calculate the Gini Coefficient for grouped as well as ungrouped data," Applied Economics Letters, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 10(8), pages 505-509.
    6. Adriana Marina, 2000. "Economic convergence of the first and second moment in the provinces of Argentina," Estudios de Economia, University of Chile, Department of Economics, vol. 27(2 Year 20), pages 259-277, December.
    7. Yue Zheng & Jinpei Ou & Guangzhao Chen & Xinxin Wu & Xiaoping Liu, 2022. "Mapping Building-Based Spatiotemporal Distributions of Carbon Dioxide Emission: A Case Study in England," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-22, May.
    8. Kevin Sylwester, 2003. "Changes in income inequality and the black market premium," Applied Economics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(4), pages 403-413.
    9. Channing Arndt & Sam Jones & Vincenzo Salvucci, 2015. "When do relative prices matter for measuring income inequality? The case of food prices in Mozambique," The Journal of Economic Inequality, Springer;Society for the Study of Economic Inequality, vol. 13(3), pages 449-464, September.
    10. Simone Pellegrino, 2020. "The Gini Coefficient: Its Origins," Working papers 070, Department of Economics, Social Studies, Applied Mathematics and Statistics (Dipartimento di Scienze Economico-Sociali e Matematico-Statistiche), University of Torino.
      • Simone Pellegrino, 2024. "The Gini Coefficient: Its Origins," Working papers 086, Department of Economics, Social Studies, Applied Mathematics and Statistics (Dipartimento di Scienze Economico-Sociali e Matematico-Statistiche), University of Torino.
    11. Laura A. Harvey & Jochen O. Mierau & James Rockey, 2024. "Inequality in an Equal Society," Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, Department of Economics, University of Oxford, vol. 86(4), pages 871-904, August.
    12. Fabian Stephany, 2017. "Who are Your Joneses? Socio-Specific Income Inequality and Trust," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 134(3), pages 877-898, December.
    13. Ivica Rubil, 2013. "Accounting for Regional Poverty Differences in Croatia: Exploring the Role of Disparities in Average Income and Inequality," Working Papers 1301, The Institute of Economics, Zagreb.
    14. Hugo Ñopo & Patricio Valenzuela, 2007. "Convirtiéndose en empresario," Research Department Publications 4520, Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department.
    15. Kajal Lahiri & Zulkarnain Pulungan, 2006. "Health Inequality and Its Determinants in New York," Discussion Papers 06-03, University at Albany, SUNY, Department of Economics.
    16. Elena Meschi & Francesco Scervini, 2014. "A new dataset on educational inequality," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 47(2), pages 695-716, September.
    17. Giorgio Di Maio, 2022. "The Barycenter of the Distribution and Its Application to the Measurement of Inequality: The Balance of Inequality, the Gini Index, and the Lorenz Curve," LIS Working papers 830, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.
    18. Valenzuela, Patricio & Ñopo, Hugo R., 2007. "Becoming an Entrepreneur," IDB Publications (Working Papers) 1951, Inter-American Development Bank.
    19. César Calderón & Alberto Chong & Rodrigo O. Valdés, 2005. "Labor Market Regulations and Income Inequality: Evidence for a Panel of Countries," Central Banking, Analysis, and Economic Policies Book Series, in: Jorge Restrepo & Andrea Tokman R. & Norman Loayza (Series Editor) & Klaus Schmidt-Hebbel (Series Edi (ed.),Labor Markets and Institutions, edition 1, volume 8, chapter 7, pages 221-279, Central Bank of Chile.
    20. Çağrı Levent USLU, 2017. "Provincial Income Inequality and Spatial Autocorrelation Across Turkish Provinces: 1992-20131," Sosyoekonomi Journal, Sosyoekonomi Society, issue 25(34).
    21. Allanson, Paul & Gerdtham, Ulf-G. & Petrie, Dennis, 2010. "Longitudinal analysis of income-related health inequality," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 29(1), pages 78-86, January.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • H23 - Public Economics - - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue - - - Externalities; Redistributive Effects; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies
    • H50 - Public Economics - - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies - - - General

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:adv:wpaper:200616. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Lykke Andersen (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/inesabo.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.