IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/h/elg/eechap/14906_4.html
   My bibliography  Save this book chapter

Space and place

In: Handbook on the Digital Creative Economy

Author

Listed:
  • Andy C. Pratt

Abstract

Digital technologies have transformed the way many creative works are generated, disseminated and used. They have made cultural products more accessible, challenged established business models and the copyright system, and blurred the boundary between producers and consumers. This unique resource presents an up-to-date overview of academic research on the impact of digitization in the creative sector of the economy.

Suggested Citation

  • Andy C. Pratt, 2013. "Space and place," Chapters, in: Ruth Towse & Christian Handke (ed.), Handbook on the Digital Creative Economy, chapter 4, pages 37-44, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    • Handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:14906_4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.elgaronline.com/view/9781781004869.00013.xml
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. ., 1998. "Weighted Voting in the US," Chapters, in: The Measurement of Voting Power, chapter 4, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    2. Jennifer Johns, 2006. "Video games production networks: value capture, power relations and embeddedness," Journal of Economic Geography, Oxford University Press, vol. 6(2), pages 151-180, April.
    3. Andy C. Pratt, 2011. "Microclustering of the Media Industries in London," Chapters, in: Charlie Karlsson & Robert G. Picard (ed.), Media Clusters, chapter 6, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    4. Braunerhjelm, Pontus & Feldman, Maryann P. (ed.), 2007. "Cluster Genesis: Technology-Based Industrial Development," OUP Catalogue, Oxford University Press, number 9780199232208.
    5. Diane Perrons, 2004. "Understanding Social and Spatial Divisions in the New Economy: New Media Clusters and the Digital Divide," Economic Geography, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 80(1), pages 45-61, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. James E. Prieger & Wei‐Min Hu, 2012. "Applications Barrier To Entry And Exclusive Vertical Contracts In Platform Markets," Economic Inquiry, Western Economic Association International, vol. 50(2), pages 435-452, April.
    2. Marie CARPENTER & Nabyla DAIDJ & Christina MORENO, 2014. "Game Console Manufacturers: the End of Sustainable Competitive Advantage?," Communications & Strategies, IDATE, Com&Strat dept., vol. 1(94), pages 39-60, 2nd quart.
    3. Goumagias, Nikolaos & Fernandes, Kiran Jude & Nucciarelli, Alberto & Li, Feng, 2022. "How to overcome path dependency through resource reconfiguration," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 78-91.
    4. Adam Sadowski & Karolina Lewandowska-Gwarda & Renata Pisarek-Bartoszewska & Per Engelseth, 2021. "A longitudinal study of e-commerce diversity in Europe," Electronic Commerce Research, Springer, vol. 21(1), pages 169-194, March.
    5. Kazuhiro Asakawa & Kiyohiko Ito & Elizabeth Rose & D. Westney, 2013. "Internationalization in Japan’s service industries," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 30(4), pages 1155-1168, December.
    6. Broekhuizen, Thijs L.J. & Lampel, Joseph & Rietveld, Joost, 2013. "New horizons or a strategic mirage? Artist-led-distribution versus alliance strategy in the video game industry," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 954-964.
    7. Maryann Feldman, 2014. "The character of innovative places: entrepreneurial strategy, economic development, and prosperity," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 43(1), pages 9-20, June.
    8. Xing Wan & Javier Cenamor & Geoffrey Parker & Marshall Van Alstyne, 2017. "Unraveling Platform Strategies: A Review from an Organizational Ambidexterity Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(5), pages 1-18, May.
    9. Inoue, Yuki, 2021. "Indirect innovation management by platform ecosystem governance and positioning: Toward collective ambidexterity in the ecosystems," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    10. Marc Bogdanowicz & Giuditta de Prato & Daniel Nepelski & Jean-Paul Simon & Wainer Lusoli, 2010. "Born Digital / Grown Digital: Assessing the Future Competitiveness of the EU Video Games Software Industry," JRC Research Reports JRC60711, Joint Research Centre.
    11. Martin Dodge & Rob Kitchin & Matthew Zook, 2009. "How Does Software Make Space? Exploring Some Geographical Dimensions of Pervasive Computing and Software Studies," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 41(6), pages 1283-1293, June.
    12. Romain Gandia & Elodie Gardet, 2019. "Sources of Dependence and Strategies to Innovate: Evidence from Video Game SMEs," Post-Print hal-01696250, HAL.
    13. Christina Teipen, 2016. "The Implications of the Value Chain and Financial Institutions for Work and Employment: Insights from the Video Game Industry in Poland, Sweden and Germany," British Journal of Industrial Relations, London School of Economics, vol. 54(2), pages 311-333, June.
    14. Roberta Comunian, 2011. "Networks of knowledge and support. Mapping relations between public, private and not for profit sector in the creative economy," ERSA conference papers ersa10p275, European Regional Science Association.
    15. Rietveld, G.J. & Eggers, J.P., 2016. "Demand Heterogeneity and the Adoption of Platform Complements," ERIM Report Series Research in Management ERS-2016-003-STR, Erasmus Research Institute of Management (ERIM), ERIM is the joint research institute of the Rotterdam School of Management, Erasmus University and the Erasmus School of Economics (ESE) at Erasmus University Rotterdam.
    16. Theodor Florian Cojoianu & Gordon L. Clark & Andreas G. F. Hoepner & Vladimir Pažitka & Dariusz Wójcik, 2021. "Fin vs. tech: are trust and knowledge creation key ingredients in fintech start-up emergence and financing?," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 1715-1731, December.
    17. Chakravarty Surajeet & Kaplan Todd R, 2010. "Vote or Shout," The B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 10(1), pages 1-14, September.
    18. Romain Gandia & Guy Parmentier, 2017. "Optimizing value creation and value capture with a digital multi-sided business model," Post-Print hal-01592885, HAL.
    19. Mónica Grau-Sarabia & Mayo Fuster-Morell, 2021. "Gender approaches in the study of the digital economy: a systematic literature review," Palgrave Communications, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 8(1), pages 1-10, December.
    20. Ian Graham Ronald Shaw & Barney Warf, 2009. "Worlds of Affect: Virtual Geographies of Video Games," Environment and Planning A, , vol. 41(6), pages 1332-1343, June.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:elg:eechap:14906_4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Darrel McCalla (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.e-elgar.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.