IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/b/idb/idbbks/11953.html

Political Economy of Trade Policy in Latin America

Author

Listed:
  • Cornick, Jorge
  • Frieden, Jeffry
  • Mesquita Moreira, Mauricio
  • Stein, Ernesto H.

Abstract

Few propositions in economics are as widely accepted as the theory of comparative advantage: If two countries have a comparative advantage in the production of different goods and services, trade can be welfare-enhancing for both. But trade policy has always been controversial in Latin America, as it is not made by academic economists but by politicians who need to gather and maintain the support of constituents who in some cases have much to lose or gain from different trade policies. This book walks the reader through a complex thicket of contending interests and disparate political institutions to analyze why Latin American governments make the trade policies they do. Its chapters show how an array of different governments have attempted to navigate frequently conflicting interests and ideas, and how different institutional arrangements impinge on trade policy design and outcomes. It is to be hoped that the experiences analyzed here can inform the making of future policy and, perhaps, help improve it.

Suggested Citation

  • Cornick, Jorge & Frieden, Jeffry & Mesquita Moreira, Mauricio & Stein, Ernesto H., 2022. "Political Economy of Trade Policy in Latin America," IDB Publications (Books), Inter-American Development Bank, number 11953, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:idb:idbbks:11953
    DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0003986
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://publications.iadb.org/publications/english/document/Political-Economy-of-Trade-Policy-in-Latin-America.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/http://dx.doi.org/10.18235/0003986?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Unai Villalba, 2013. "vs Development: a paradigm shift in the Andes?," Third World Quarterly, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(8), pages 1427-1442.
    2. Stoyanov, Andrey, 2009. "Trade policy of a free trade agreement in the presence of foreign lobbying," Journal of International Economics, Elsevier, vol. 77(1), pages 37-49, February.
    3. Urbatsch, Robert, 2013. "A Referendum on Trade Theory: Voting on Free Trade in Costa Rica," International Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 67(1), pages 197-214, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Mauricio Mesquita Moreira & Marcelo Dolabella, 2024. "Does trade policy help or hinder global warming? A case study of Latin America and the Caribbean," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(2), pages 779-805, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Čajka, Adam & Novotný, Josef, 2022. "Let us expand this Western project by admitting diversity and enhancing rigor: A systematic review of empirical research on alternative economies," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C).
    2. Cai, Dapeng & Jørgensen, Jan Guldager, 2017. "Mutual Recognition for Sale: International Bargaining over Product Standards," Discussion Papers on Economics 1/2017, University of Southern Denmark, Department of Economics.
    3. William Coleman, 2017. "The Social and Economic Determinants of Voting ‘Yes’ in South Australia’s Federation Referenda," CEPR Discussion Papers 700, Centre for Economic Policy Research, Research School of Economics, Australian National University.
    4. Yuting Gao, 2022. "Lobbying for Trade Liberalization and its Policy Influence," CAEPR Working Papers 2022-006 Classification-D, Center for Applied Economics and Policy Research, Department of Economics, Indiana University Bloomington.
    5. Katy Jenkins, 2024. "Between Hope and Loss: Peruvian Women Activists’ Visual Contestations of Extractive-led Development," Progress in Development Studies, , vol. 24(1), pages 48-67, January.
    6. Joyce Hsiu-yen Yeh & Su-chen Lin & Shu-chuan Lai & Ying-hao Huang & Chen Yi-fong & Yi-tze Lee & Fikret Berkes, 2021. "Taiwanese Indigenous Cultural Heritage and Revitalization: Community Practices and Local Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-16, February.
    7. Kim, Young-Han & Kim, Sang-Kee, 2012. "Welfare effects of competitive lobbying efforts in international oligopoly markets," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 29(3), pages 614-620.
    8. Jie Li & Xiaohui Xu & Jing Lu, 2015. "Negotiation over Intellectual Property Rights Protection in a Mixed Market," Review of Development Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 19(4), pages 759-775, November.
    9. Polk, Andreas & Schmutzler, Armin & Müller, Adrian, 2014. "Lobbying and the power of multinational firms," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 36(C), pages 209-227.
    10. Karolien van Teijlingen & Barbara Hogenboom, 2016. "Debating Alternative Development at the Mining Frontier: Buen Vivir and the Conflict around El Mirador Mine in Ecuador," Journal of Developing Societies, , vol. 32(4), pages 382-420, December.
    11. Dapeng Cai & Jie Li, 2012. "Quid pro quo and the enforcement of intellectual property rights protection: A bargaining approach," The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 21(6), pages 755-772, December.
    12. Mery Angeles Perez, 2023. "Integrating perspectives for conversations on territory: turning to indigenous knowledge to inform policy and practice," The Annals of Regional Science, Springer;Western Regional Science Association, vol. 71(1), pages 145-170, August.
    13. Qasim, Ahmed Waqar & Itaya, Jun-ichi, 2019. "Trade Policy with Intermediate Inputs Trade," Discussion paper series. A 342, Graduate School of Economics and Business Administration, Hokkaido University.
    14. Subhayu Bandyopadhyay & Sajal Lahiri & Howard J. Wall, 2009. "Cross-border lobbying in preferential trading agreements: implications for external tariffs," Working Papers 2009-041, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis.
    15. Haifang Huang & Ke Pang & Yao Tang, 2014. "Effects of Exchange Rates on Employment in Canada," Canadian Public Policy, University of Toronto Press, vol. 40(4), pages 339-352, December.
    16. Kuenzel, David J. & Sharma, Rishi R., 2021. "Preferential trade agreements and MFN tariffs: Global evidence," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 138(C).
    17. Stoyanov, Andrey & Yildiz, Halis Murat, 2015. "Preferential versus multilateral trade liberalization and the role of political economy," European Economic Review, Elsevier, vol. 80(C), pages 140-164.
    18. John M. de Figueiredo & Brian Kelleher Richter, 2013. "Advancing the Empirical Research on Lobbying," NBER Working Papers 19698, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    19. Cohle, Zachary & Ortega, Alberto, 2022. "Life of the party: The polarizing effect of foreign direct investment," European Journal of Political Economy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).
    20. Dapeng Cai & Jie Li, 2014. "Protection versus Free Trade: Lobbying Competition between Domestic and Foreign Firms," Southern Economic Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 81(2), pages 489-505, October.

    More about this item

    JEL classification:

    • F13 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Trade Policy; International Trade Organizations
    • F14 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Empirical Studies of Trade
    • F15 - International Economics - - Trade - - - Economic Integration
    • O24 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Development Planning and Policy - - - Trade Policy; Factor Movement; Foreign Exchange Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:idb:idbbks:11953. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Felipe Herrera Library (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/iadbbus.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.