IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/zbw/espost/342308.html

Understanding multiple pathways of the impacts of socio‐economic shocks on large carnivores

Author

Listed:
  • Murali, Ranjini
  • Adabaeva, Altynai
  • Angulo, Sixto
  • Arispe, Rosario
  • Baumann, Matthias
  • Ghoddousi, Arash
  • Hamidi, Amirhossein Khaleghi
  • Jansen, Martin
  • Khalatbari, Leili
  • Khorozyan, Igor
  • Maillard, Oswaldo
  • Müller, Daniel
  • Romero‐Mũnoz, Alfredo
  • Rosen, Tatjana
  • Rumiz, Damian
  • Soshin, Alex
  • Yusefi, Gholam Hosein
  • Kümmerle, Tobias

Abstract

Large carnivores are ecologically, economically and socially important, but they are also among the most threatened species worldwide. These species face numerous threats, most importantly habitat transformation, prey depletion and hunting. All of these threats could be exacerbated by socio‐economic shocks—such as financial crises, wars, pandemics or political regime shifts—that can cause sudden and structural changes in social‐ecological systems. However, the different pathways through which such shocks impact large carnivores are unclear. Here, we used a social‐ecological systems approach to build a conceptual framework that investigates these pathways. We used expert workshops and case‐specific, narrative literature reviews to illustrate this framework for three cases: (1) impacts of economic sanctions on the Asiatic cheetah ( Acinonyx jubatus venaticus ) in Iran, (2) impacts of global commodity price shocks on the jaguar ( Panthera onca ) in Bolivia and (3) impacts of the collapse of the Soviet Union on the snow leopard ( P. uncia ) in Kyrgyzstan. We found that conservation and agricultural institutions were crucial for carnivore conservation, despite the different nature of the shocks and the different socio‐economic settings across cases. We identified linkages between carnivore conservation and the global economy at the levels of nations and communities, which increased the vulnerability of carnivores to shocks. Our cases highlighted the need to proactively create resilient institutions focused on local capacity building, enhancement of social stability and built on internal motivations for conservation, to secure the future of large carnivores in turbulent times.

Suggested Citation

  • Murali, Ranjini & Adabaeva, Altynai & Angulo, Sixto & Arispe, Rosario & Baumann, Matthias & Ghoddousi, Arash & Hamidi, Amirhossein Khaleghi & Jansen, Martin & Khalatbari, Leili & Khorozyan, Igor & Mai, 2025. "Understanding multiple pathways of the impacts of socio‐economic shocks on large carnivores," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 7(11), pages 3104-3125.
  • Handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:342308
    DOI: 10.1002/pan3.70162
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/342308/1/Murali_2025_Understanding_multiple_pathways.pdf
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/pan3.70162?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Troumbis, Andreas Y. & Zevgolis, Yiannis, 2020. "Biodiversity crime and economic crisis: Hidden mechanisms of misuse of ecosystem goods in Greece," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C).
    2. Dario Laudati, 2023. "Evidence and Policy Implications of Sanctions in the Long Run: The Case of Iran," EconPol Forum, CESifo, vol. 24(03), pages 27-30, May.
    3. Moghaddasi Kelishomi, Ali & Nisticò, Roberto, 2022. "Employment effects of economic sanctions in Iran," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 151(C).
    4. Daniel Rondeau & Brianna Perry & Franque Grimard, 2020. "The Consequences of COVID-19 and Other Disasters for Wildlife and Biodiversity," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 76(4), pages 945-961, August.
    5. W. Neil Adger, 2007. "Ecological and Social Resilience," Chapters, in: Giles Atkinson & Simon Dietz (ed.), Handbook of Sustainable Development, chapter 5, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    6. Marín, Andrés & Berkes, Fikret, 2010. "Network approach for understanding small-scale fisheries governance: The case of the Chilean coastal co-management system," Marine Policy, Elsevier, vol. 34(5), pages 851-858, September.
    7. Babu, Suresh & Reidhead, William, 2000. "Poverty, food security, and nutrition in Central Asia: a case study of the Kyrgyz Republic," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 25(6), pages 647-660, December.
    8. Pacheco, Pablo & de Jong, Wil & Johnson, James, 2010. "The evolution of the timber sector in lowland Bolivia: Examining the influence of three disparate policy approaches," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 12(4), pages 271-276, April.
    9. Vatn, Arild, 2005. "Rationality, institutions and environmental policy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(2), pages 203-217, November.
    10. Young, Carlos Eduardo Frickmann & Castro, Biancca Scarpeline, 2021. "Financing mechanisms to bridge the resource gap to conserve biodiversity and ecosystem services in Brazil," Ecosystem Services, Elsevier, vol. 50(C).
    11. Kaveh Madani, 2021. "Have International Sanctions Impacted Iran’s Environment?," World, MDPI, vol. 2(2), pages 1-22, April.
    12. Mauricio Mora Barrenechea, 2020. "Cambios en el tiempo de los efectos de los precios de las materias primas en Bolivia," Revista de Análisis del BCB, Banco Central de Bolivia, vol. 32(1), pages 123-168, January -.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nguyen KimDung & Simon R. Bush & Arthur P. J. Mol, 2016. "The Vietnamese State and Administrative Co-Management of Nature Reserves," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(3), pages 1-19, March.
    2. Bobulescu, Roxana & Fritscheova, Aneta, 2021. "Convivial innovation in sustainable communities: Four cases in France," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    3. Robert Roßner & Dimitrios Zikos, 2018. "The Role of Homogeneity and Heterogeneity Among Resource Users on Water Governance: Lessons Learnt from an Economic Field Experiment on Irrigation in Uzbekistan," Water Economics and Policy (WEP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 4(03), pages 1-30, July.
    4. Latukha, Marina & Dikova, Desislava & Panibratov, Andrei & Kuleshov, Nikita, 2026. "The double bind: Human resource management under sanctions and skilled labor exodus," International Business Review, Elsevier, vol. 35(1).
    5. Patrick Bottazzi & David Crespo & Harry Soria & Hy Dao & Marcelo Serrudo & Jean Paul Benavides & Stefan Schwarzer & Stephan Rist, 2014. "Carbon Sequestration in Community Forests: Trade-offs, Multiple Outcomes and Institutional Diversity in the Bolivian Amazon," Development and Change, International Institute of Social Studies, vol. 45(1), pages 105-131, January.
    6. repec:osf:socarx:jnexr_v1 is not listed on IDEAS
    7. repec:sae:envval:v:26:y:2017:i:2:p:157-176 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Olegas Beriozovas & Dalia Perkumienė & Mindaugas Škėma & Abdellah Saoualih & Larbi Safaa & Marius Aleinikovas, 2024. "Research Advancement in Forest Property Rights: A Thematic Review over Half a Decade Using Natural Language Processing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-28, September.
    9. Del Corso, Jean-Pierre & Kephaliacos, Charilaos & Plumecocq, Gaël, 2015. "Legitimizing farmers' new knowledge, learning and practices through communicative action: Application of an agro-environmental policy," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 86-96.
    10. Hiedanpää, Juha & Ramcilovik-Suominen, Sabaheta & Salo, Matti, 2023. "Neoliberal pathways to the bioeconomy: Forest land use institutions in Chile, Finland, and Laos," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C).
    11. Chapman, Mollie & Satterfield, Terre & Chan, Kai M.A., 2019. "When value conflicts are barriers: Can relational values help explain farmer participation in conservation incentive programs?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 464-475.
    12. Nichiforel, Liviu & Keary, Kevin & Deuffic, Philippe & Weiss, Gerhard & Thorsen, Bo Jellesmark & Winkel, Georg & Avdibegović, Mersudin & Dobšinská, Zuzana & Feliciano, Diana & Gatto, Paola & Gorriz Mi, 2018. "How private are Europe’s private forests? A comparative property rights analysis," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 535-552.
    13. Skurray, James H., 2015. "The scope for collective action in a large groundwater basin: An institutional analysis of aquifer governance in Western Australia," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 128-140.
    14. Norgaard, Richard B., 2010. "Ecosystem services: From eye-opening metaphor to complexity blinder," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(6), pages 1219-1227, April.
    15. Kvakkestad, Valborg, 2009. "Institutions and the R&D of GM-crops," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(10), pages 2688-2695, August.
    16. Yilanci, Veli & Kongkuah, Maxwell, 2025. "Forest product footprint convergence in the Amazon: A panel data analysis of ACTO countries," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 180(C).
    17. Trædal, Leif Tore & Vedeld, Pål Olav & Pétursson, Jón Geir, 2016. "Analyzing the transformations of forest PES in Vietnam: Implications for REDD+," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 109-117.
    18. Spash, Clive L. & Vatn, Arild, 2006. "Transferring environmental value estimates: Issues and alternatives," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(2), pages 379-388, December.
    19. Vatn, Arild, 2009. "An institutional analysis of methods for environmental appraisal," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 68(8-9), pages 2207-2215, June.
    20. Padmanabhan, Martina, 2011. "Women and men as conservers, users and managers of agrobiodiversity," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics (formerly The Journal of Socio-Economics), Elsevier, vol. 40(6), pages 968-976.
    21. repec:sae:envval:v:23:y:2014:i:5:p:529-549 is not listed on IDEAS
    22. Palola, Pirta & Bailey, Richard & Wedding, Lisa, 2022. "A novel framework to operationalise value-pluralism in environmental valuation: Environmental value functions," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    23. Guang Han & Ping Zhai & Liqun Zhu & Kongqing Li, 2023. "Economic Incentives, Reputation Incentives, and Rural Residents’ Participation in Household Waste Classification: Evidence from Jiangsu, China," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-15, October.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:zbw:espost:342308. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/zbwkide.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.