IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/woraff/v185y2022i3p471-499.html

Narrative Empathy

Author

Listed:
  • Mark K. McBeth
  • Donna L. Lybecker
  • Jessica M. Sargent

Abstract

Understanding the reasoning behind diverse views grows empathy and can help strengthen democracy. This study examines narratives and their influence on individuals, to see if individuals only empathize with narratives from those with whom they share identity. Using an experimental design, we test empathy with working class climate change narratives. Results showed participants who agreed with anthropogenic climate change, who were given both evidence and a narrative, empathized with the narrator (either an organic farmer or a mechanic) that told a pro‐climate change narrative. The greatest empathy was for the mechanic telling a pro‐climate change narrative. Conversely, participants who did not agree with human‐caused climate change and who were given evidence without narrative had more empathy for the organic farmer (over the mechanic) who told a pro‐climate change narrative. Overall, we found some identity issues negatively influenced empathy, but we also found examples where individuals moved beyond their identity. Comprender el razonamiento detrás de los diversos puntos de vista aumenta la empatía y puede ayudar a fortalecer la democracia. Este estudio examina las narrativas y su influencia en las personas, para ver si las personas solo sienten empatía por las narrativas de aquellos con quienes comparten identidad. Usando un diseño experimental, probamos la empatía con las narrativas del cambio climático de la clase trabajadora. Los resultados mostraron participantes que estaban de acuerdo con el cambio climático antropogénico, a quienes se les dio evidencia y una narrativa, empatizaron con el narrador (ya sea un agricultor orgánico o un mecánico) que contó una narrativa a favor del cambio climático. La mayor empatía fue para el mecánico contando una narrativa a favor del cambio climático. Por el contrario, los participantes que no estaban de acuerdo con el cambio climático causado por el hombre y que recibieron evidencia sin narración, tenían más empatía por el agricultor orgánico (sobre el mecánico) que contó una narrativa a favor del cambio climático. En general, encontramos algunos problemas de identidad que influyeron negativamente en la empatía, pero también encontramos ejemplos en los que las personas se movieron más allá de su identidad. 理解不同观点背后的推理能培养同理心,并有助于加强民主。本研究分析了叙事及其对个体的影响,以了解个体是否只对拥有共同身份的叙事者的叙事产生共情。通过使用一项实验设计,我们检验了对工人阶级气候变化叙事产生的共情。结果显示,认为气候变化由人类造成并且被提供证据及叙事的那部分参与者,与讲述支持气候变化叙事的叙事者(有机农民或机械工)产生共情。讲述支持气候变化叙事的机械工引起了最大的共情。相反,不认为气候变化由人引起并且被提供证据(无叙事)的参与者,对讲述支持气候变化叙事的有机农民(而不是机械工)产生更多的共情。总体而言,我们发现,一些身份问题会对共情产生负面影响,但我们也发现了个体观点不受身份影响的例子。

Suggested Citation

  • Mark K. McBeth & Donna L. Lybecker & Jessica M. Sargent, 2022. "Narrative Empathy," World Affairs, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 185(3), pages 471-499, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:woraff:v:185:y:2022:i:3:p:471-499
    DOI: 10.1177/00438200221107018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/00438200221107018
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/00438200221107018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Dan M. Kahan & Ellen Peters & Maggie Wittlin & Paul Slovic & Lisa Larrimore Ouellette & Donald Braman & Gregory Mandel, 2012. "The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 2(10), pages 732-735, October.
    2. Maria Husmann, 2015. "Social constructions of obesity target population: an empirical look at obesity policy narratives," Policy Sciences, Springer;Society of Policy Sciences, vol. 48(4), pages 415-442, December.
    3. Charles S. Taber & Milton Lodge, 2006. "Motivated Skepticism in the Evaluation of Political Beliefs," American Journal of Political Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 50(3), pages 755-769, July.
    4. Thomas Douenne, 2020. "The Vertical and Horizontal Distributive Effects of Energy Taxes: A Case Study of a French Policy," Post-Print halshs-02973076, HAL.
    5. Jeremiah Bohr, 2014. "Public views on the dangers and importance of climate change: predicting climate change beliefs in the United States through income moderated by party identification," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 126(1), pages 217-227, September.
    6. Paul James Pope, 2017. "CONSTRUCTING THE REFUGEE AS VILLAIN: An Analysis of Syrian Refugee Policy Narratives Used to Justify a State of Exception," World Affairs, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 180(3), pages 53-71, September.
    7. repec:aen:journl:ej41-3-douenne is not listed on IDEAS
    8. Juhi Huda, 2018. "An Examination of Policy Narratives in Agricultural Biotechnology Policy in India," World Affairs, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 181(1), pages 42-68, March.
    9. Thomas Douenne, 2020. "The Vertical and Horizontal Distributive Effects of Energy Taxes: A Case Study of a French Policy," The Energy Journal, , vol. 41(3), pages 231-254, May.
    10. Maeve Cooke, 2000. "Five Arguments for Deliberative Democracy," Political Studies, Political Studies Association, vol. 48(5), pages 947-969, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mathilde Aubouin & Paolo Melindi-Ghidi & Jean-Philippe Nicolaï, 2025. "Complementarity in Household Expenditures on Fixed and Mobile Internet in France," Annals of Economics and Statistics, GENES, issue 159, pages 143-174.
    2. Erik C. Nisbet & Kathryn E. Cooper & R. Kelly Garrett, 2015. "The Partisan Brain," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 658(1), pages 36-66, March.
    3. Maier Sofia & De Poli Silvia & Klenert David & Amores Antonio F & Dreoni Ilda, 2026. "Green EUROMOD: the environmental extension of the EU’s tax-benefit microsimulation model," JRC Working Papers on Taxation & Structural Reforms 2026-04, Joint Research Centre.
    4. Allison Joy Bailey & Caitlin M. Wills & Jamie Mitchem, 2022. "Attitudes towards climate change and scientific stories," Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences, Springer;Association of Environmental Studies and Sciences, vol. 12(4), pages 714-726, December.
    5. Shahir Adnan & Ferrari Emanuele, 2026. "Distributional and Economy-Wide Impacts of a Carbon Tax in Ethiopia," JRC Working Papers on Economic Analysis of Policies for Africa 2026-03, Joint Research Centre.
    6. Combet, Emmanuel & Le Treut, Gaëlle & Méjean, Aurélie & Teixeira, Antoine, 2025. "The equity and efficiency trade-off of carbon tax revenue recycling: A re-examination," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 148(C).
    7. Bonnet, Odran & Fize, Étienne & Loisel, Tristan & Wilner, Lionel, 2025. "Compensating against fuel price inflation: Price subsidies or transfers?," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).
    8. Kettner, Claudia & Leoni, Thomas & Köberl, Judith & Kortschak, Dominik & Sommer, Mark & Kulmer, Veronika, 2026. "Investigating equity and efficiency in carbon pricing with revenue recycling: A combined macro- and micro-modelling approach," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 209(PB).
    9. Bertoli, Paola & Grembi, Veronica & Morelli, Massimo & Rosso, Anna Cecilia, 2023. "In medio stat virtus? Effective communication and preferences for redistribution in hard times," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 214(C), pages 105-147.
    10. Mohamed Mostagir & James Siderius, 2022. "Learning in a Post-Truth World," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 68(4), pages 2860-2868, April.
    11. Michael M. Lokshin & Hannon,Michael & Miguel Purroy & Ivan Torre, 2024. "Do More Informed Citizens Make Better Climate Policy Decisions ?," Policy Research Working Paper Series 10921, The World Bank.
    12. Charles Labrousse & Yann Perdereau, 2024. "Geography versus income: the heterogeneous effects of carbon taxation," Working Papers halshs-04464900, HAL.
    13. Carisa Bergner & Bruce A. Desmarais & John Hird, 2019. "Speaking truth in power: Scientific evidence as motivation for policy activism," Journal of Behavioral Public Administration, Center for Experimental and Behavioral Public Administration, vol. 2(1).
    14. Moon, Won-Ki & Kahlor, Lee Ann, 2025. "Fact-checking in the age of AI: Reducing biases with non-human information sources," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    15. Lawrence C. Hamilton, 2018. "Self-assessed understanding of climate change," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 151(2), pages 349-362, November.
    16. Ester Faia & Andreas Fuster & Vincenzo Pezone & Basit Zafar, 2024. "Biases in Information Selection and Processing: Survey Evidence from the Pandemic," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 106(3), pages 829-847, May.
    17. Teresa Lackner & Stefan Nabernegg, 2026. "Who pays for decarbonizing homes?," Graz Economics Papers 2026-07, University of Graz, Department of Economics.
    18. Angela Köppl & Margit Schratzenstaller, 2023. "Carbon taxation: A review of the empirical literature," Journal of Economic Surveys, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(4), pages 1353-1388, September.
    19. Bursens, Floore & De Poli, Silvia & Maier, Sofia & Verbist, Gerlinde, 2026. "Bridging climate and social equity: Progressive carbon tax simulations for Belgium," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    20. Antonio Gutiérrez-Lythgoe & José María Labeaga & José Alberto Molina, 2025. "The Distributional and Environmental Dilemma of Energy Price Shocks," Boston College Working Papers in Economics 1091, Boston College Department of Economics.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:woraff:v:185:y:2022:i:3:p:471-499. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.