IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/transj/v61y2022i1p18-59.html

The Importance of Secondary Markets in the Changing Retail Landscape: A Longitudinal Study in the United States and China

Author

Listed:
  • Zachary S. Rogers
  • Dale S. Rogers
  • Haozhe Chen

Abstract

Due to shifting consumer expectations and the growth in e‐commerce, companies are flush with returned product and excess inventory. Many firms have turned to secondary market channels to disposition excess goods and capture a greater percentage of their value. However, the secondary market has not gained sufficient attention from supply chain management researchers. To understand how firms are using these alternative channels of disposition, we collected and analyzed longitudinal survey data (collected in 2014 and 2017) from the United States and China. We find that US firms generally utilize secondary markets for different reasons than their Chinese counterparts and have found more success. However, while the results suggest that US secondary markets are more mature than their Chinese counterparts, the gap between the two countries appears to be narrowing.

Suggested Citation

  • Zachary S. Rogers & Dale S. Rogers & Haozhe Chen, 2022. "The Importance of Secondary Markets in the Changing Retail Landscape: A Longitudinal Study in the United States and China," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 61(1), pages 18-59, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:transj:v:61:y:2022:i:1:p:18-59
    DOI: 10.5325/transportationj.61.1.0018
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.5325/transportationj.61.1.0018
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.5325/transportationj.61.1.0018?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Daniel Krause & Davide Luzzini & Benn Lawson, 2018. "Building the Case for A Single Key Informant in Supply Chain Management Survey Research," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 54(1), pages 42-50, January.
    2. Dan Ariely & George Loewenstein & Drazen Prelec, 2003. ""Coherent Arbitrariness": Stable Demand Curves Without Stable Preferences," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 118(1), pages 73-106.
    3. Listes, Ovidiu & Dekker, Rommert, 2005. "A stochastic approach to a case study for product recovery network design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 160(1), pages 268-287, January.
    4. Srivastava, Samir K., 2008. "Network design for reverse logistics," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 36(4), pages 535-548, August.
    5. Kathleen M. Eisenhardt & Jeffrey A. Martin, 2000. "Dynamic capabilities: what are they?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 21(10‐11), pages 1105-1121, October.
    6. Genchev, Stefan E., 2009. "Reverse logistics program design: A company study," Business Horizons, Elsevier, vol. 52(2), pages 139-148.
    7. He, Yuanjie & Zhang, Jiang, 2010. "Random yield supply chain with a yield dependent secondary market," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 206(1), pages 221-230, October.
    8. Frank Montabon & Patricia J. Daugherty & Haozhe Chen, 2018. "Setting Standards for Single Respondent Survey Design," Journal of Supply Chain Management, Institute for Supply Management, vol. 54(1), pages 35-41, January.
    9. Hong, I-Hsuan & Yeh, Jun-Sheng, 2012. "Modeling closed-loop supply chains in the electronics industry: A retailer collection application," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 48(4), pages 817-829.
    10. Angeloantonio Russo & Francesco Perrini, 2010. "Investigating Stakeholder Theory and Social Capital: CSR in Large Firms and SMEs," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 91(2), pages 207-221, January.
    11. Bodo Möslein-Tröppner & Michael Stros & David Říha, 2020. "Customer Loyalty-Related Marketing Measures in Fashion Markets," Central European Business Review, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2020(1), pages 43-55.
    12. Terry L. Esper & Simone T. Peinkofer, 2017. "Consumer‐Based Supply Chain Management Performance Research: A Structured Literature Review," Transportation Journal, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 56(4), pages 395-428, October.
    13. R. Canan Savaskan & Shantanu Bhattacharya & Luk N. Van Wassenhove, 2004. "Closed-Loop Supply Chain Models with Product Remanufacturing," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(2), pages 239-252, February.
    14. Lars Bergkvist, 2015. "Appropriate use of single-item measures is here to stay," Marketing Letters, Springer, vol. 26(3), pages 245-255, September.
    15. Huang, Ximin & Gu, Jia-Wen & Ching, Wai-Ki & Siu, Tak-Kuen, 2014. "Impact of secondary market on consumer return policies and supply chain coordination," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 45(C), pages 57-70.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Gamberini, Rita & Gebennini, Elisa & Manzini, Riccardo & Ziveri, Andrea, 2010. "On the integration of planning and environmental impact assessment for a WEEE transportation network—A case study," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 54(11), pages 937-951.
    2. Feng, Lipan & Zheng, Xiong & Govindan, Kannan & Xue, Kelei, 2019. "Does the presence of secondary market platform really hurt the firm?," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 213(C), pages 55-68.
    3. Agrawal, Saurabh & Singh, Rajesh K. & Murtaza, Qasim, 2015. "A literature review and perspectives in reverse logistics," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 97(C), pages 76-92.
    4. Roberto Chavez & Wantao Yu & Muhammad Shakeel Sadiq Jajja & Antonio Lecuna & Brian Fynes, 2020. "Can entrepreneurial orientation improve sustainable development through leveraging internal lean practices?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 2211-2225, September.
    5. Assarzadegan, Parisa & Rasti-Barzoki, Morteza, 2020. "A game theoretic approach for pricing under a return policy and a money back guarantee in a closed loop supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    6. Schweiger, Katharina & Sahamie, Ramin, 2013. "A hybrid Tabu Search approach for the design of a paper recycling network," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 50(C), pages 98-119.
    7. Chung, Sung H. & Weaver, Robert D. & Friesz, Terry L., 2013. "Strategic response to pollution taxes in supply chain networks: Dynamic, spatial, and organizational dimensions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 231(2), pages 314-327.
    8. Nathaniel Boso & Joseph Amankwah-Amoah & Dominic Essuman & Oluwaseun E. Olabode & Patience Bruce & Magnus Hultman & James Kofi Kutsoati & Ogechi Adeola, 2023. "Configuring political relationships to navigate host-country institutional complexity: Insights from Anglophone sub-Saharan Africa," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 54(6), pages 1055-1089, August.
    9. Rahman, Shams & Subramanian, Nachiappan, 2012. "Factors for implementing end-of-life computer recycling operations in reverse supply chains," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 239-248.
    10. John Cantrell & Elias Kyriazis & Gary Noble, 2015. "Developing CSR Giving as a Dynamic Capability for Salient Stakeholder Management," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 130(2), pages 403-421, August.
    11. Jackson Jinhong Mi & Zongsheng Huang & Kai Wang & Sang-Bing Tsai & Guodong Li & Jiangtao Wang, 2018. "The Presence of a Powerful Retailer on Dynamic Collecting Closed-Loop Supply Chain From a Sustainable Innovation Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 10(7), pages 1-17, June.
    12. Jiafu Su & Chi Li & Qingjun Zeng & Jiaquan Yang & Jie Zhang, 2019. "A Green Closed-Loop Supply Chain Coordination Mechanism Based on Third-Party Recycling," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(19), pages 1-14, September.
    13. Wongthatsanekorn, Wuthichai & Realff, Matthew J. & Ammons, Jane C., 2010. "Multi-time scale Markov decision process approach to strategic network growth of reverse supply chains," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 38(1-2), pages 20-32, February.
    14. Liao, Haolan & Zhang, Qingyu & Li, Lu, 2023. "Optimal procurement strategy for multi-echelon remanufacturing systems under quality uncertainty," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 170(C).
    15. Wang, Junbin & Zhang, Ting & Fan, Xiaojun, 2020. "Reverse channel design with a dominant retailer and upstream competition in emerging markets: Retailer- or manufacturer- collection?," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 137(C).
    16. Maiti, T. & Giri, B.C., 2017. "Two-way product recovery in a closed-loop supply chain with variable markup under price and quality dependent demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PA), pages 259-272.
    17. Wang, Yuyan & Yu, Zhaoqing & Shen, Liang & Jin, Mingzhou, 2022. "Operational modes of E-closed loop supply chain considering platforms’ services," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 251(C).
    18. Hui Li & Chuanxu Wang & Meng Shang & Wei Ou, 2017. "Pricing, Carbon Emission Reduction, Low-Carbon Promotion and Returning Decision in a Closed-Loop Supply Chain under Vertical and Horizontal Cooperation," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-26, November.
    19. Eskandarpour, Majid & Zegordi, Seyed Hessameddin & Nikbakhsh, Ehsan, 2013. "A parallel variable neighborhood search for the multi-objective sustainable post-sales network design problem," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 145(1), pages 117-131.
    20. Hassini, Elkafi & Surti, Chirag & Searcy, Cory, 2012. "A literature review and a case study of sustainable supply chains with a focus on metrics," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 69-82.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:transj:v:61:y:2022:i:1:p:18-59. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.