IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/syseng/v4y2001i2p134-144.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Learning and improvement in product innovation processes: Enabling behaviors

Author

Listed:
  • Jose F.B. Gieskes
  • Ilse Langenberg

Abstract

Product Innovation is described as a continuous and cross‐functional process involving all stages in the product life cycle. This approach gives way to study product innovation processes from a continuous improvement and learning viewpoint. The Continuous Improvement in the global product MAnagement (CIMA) model describes learning and improvement within product innovation processes in terms of a number of interrelated variables: (improvement) performances, behaviors, and levers to stimulate learning and improvement, contingencies, and learning/innovation capabilities. At the Research & Development Department of THOMSON‐CSF SIGNAAL the model was used to assess its current practices with regard to learning and improvement in product innovation processes. The results validate efforts on current and past improvement actions and provide additional insight into the past, current, and future situation. Explicit use of levers that relate to the transfer of knowledge within the product innovation process, such as the formalization and explicit deployment of the emerging strategy, innovation process definition, project planning and control, and human resource management policies, will increase improvement and learning. The recommendations are used to enhance current CMM‐based improvement plans and expand implementation plans. © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Inc. Syst Eng 4: 134–144, 2001

Suggested Citation

  • Jose F.B. Gieskes & Ilse Langenberg, 2001. "Learning and improvement in product innovation processes: Enabling behaviors," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 4(2), pages 134-144.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:4:y:2001:i:2:p:134-144
    DOI: 10.1002/sys.1011
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sys.1011
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sys.1011?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Sanderson, Susan & Uzumeri, Mustafa, 1995. "Managing product families: The case of the Sony Walkman," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 24(5), pages 761-782, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peter E. Harland & Zakir Uddin & Sven Laudien, 2020. "Product platforms as a lever of competitive advantage on a company-wide level: a resource management perspective," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 137-158, February.
    2. Wallace J. Hopp & Xiaowei Xu, 2005. "Product Line Selection and Pricing with Modularity in Design," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 7(3), pages 172-187, August.
    3. Alan MacCormack & John Rusnak & Carliss Y. Baldwin, 2006. "Exploring the Structure of Complex Software Designs: An Empirical Study of Open Source and Proprietary Code," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 52(7), pages 1015-1030, July.
    4. Crass, Dirk & Schwiebacher, Franz, 2013. "Do trademarks diminish the substitutability of products in innovative knowledge-intensive services?," ZEW Discussion Papers 13-061, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    5. MacCormack, Alan & Baldwin, Carliss & Rusnak, John, 2012. "Exploring the duality between product and organizational architectures: A test of the “mirroring” hypothesis," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 41(8), pages 1309-1324.
    6. Gawer, Annabelle, 2014. "Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(7), pages 1239-1249.
    7. Ryan Boas & Bruce G. Cameron & Edward F. Crawley, 2013. "Divergence and lifecycle offsets in product families with commonality," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 16(2), pages 175-192, June.
    8. Czarnitzki, Dirk & Thorwarth, Susanne, 2009. "The design paradox: the contribution of in-house and external design activities on product market performance," ZEW Discussion Papers 09-068, ZEW - Leibniz Centre for European Economic Research.
    9. Clemente, Maurizio & Salazar, Mauro & Hofman, Theo, 2025. "Concurrent design optimization of powertrain component modules in a family of electric vehicles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 379(C).
    10. Köhler, Lutz, 2002. "Organisation der Produktinnovation in Medienunternehmen: Eine Analyse des Forschungsstandes zur Ablauforganisation der Innovation von Online-Produkten," Working Papers 2/2002, University of Munich, Munich School of Management, Institute for Information Systems and New Media.
    11. Liu, Heng & Özer, Özalp, 2009. "Managing a product family under stochastic technological changes," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 567-580, December.
    12. Baldwin, Carliss & MacCormack, Alan & Rusnak, John, 2014. "Hidden structure: Using network methods to map system architecture," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(8), pages 1381-1397.
    13. Daniel Trabucchi & Tommaso Buganza & Laurent Muzellec & Sébastien Ronteau, 2021. "Platform‐driven innovation: Unveiling research and business opportunities," Post-Print hal-03718524, HAL.
    14. Azad M. Madni, 2012. "Adaptable platform‐based engineering: Key enablers and outlook for the future," Systems Engineering, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 15(1), pages 95-107, March.
    15. Svenja C. Sommer & Christoph H. Loch & Jing Dong, 2009. "Managing Complexity and Unforeseeable Uncertainty in Startup Companies: An Empirical Study," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 20(1), pages 118-133, February.
    16. Päivi Oinas & Edward J. Malecki, 2002. "The Evolution of Technologies in Time and Space: From National and Regional to Spatial Innovation Systems," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 25(1), pages 102-131, January.
    17. Gil, Nuno & Tether, Bruce S., 2011. "Project risk management and design flexibility: Analysing a case and conditions of complementarity," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(3), pages 415-428, April.
    18. Burton, Nicholas & Galvin, Peter, 2022. "Modularity, value and exceptions to the mirroring hypothesis," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 635-650.
    19. Liu, Yue & Zhu, Xiumei & Deng, Shengliang, 2025. "How platform enterprises compete through suppliers: the mediation role of supplier value co-creation between digital platform capabilities and competitive advantage," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    20. Syam, Siddhartha S. & Bhatnagar, Amit, 2015. "A decision support model for determining the level of product variety with marketing and supply chain considerations," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 25(C), pages 12-21.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:syseng:v:4:y:2001:i:2:p:134-144. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1520-6858 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.