IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v33y2025i3p3818-3830.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From Agri‐Waste to Sustainable Use: A Case Study of Straw Management Reform in Northeast China

Author

Listed:
  • Zhiwei Yu
  • Fan Li
  • Wei Si
  • Weifeng Zhang

Abstract

Sustainable agri‐waste utilization is a crucial stage in transforming agricultural production into low‐carbon. Straws, as the primary agricultural waste, are not effectively reused by farmers in developing countries. Burning straws can be widely observed and it is one of the main sources of CO2 and PM2.5 emissions from the agricultural sector. Since 2013, China has reformed its agri‐waste governance to promote sustainable use of straws. However, few studies have analyzed the structural change and field operation of its agri‐waste policies, and limited evidence has been drawn on the effectiveness of these policies. The objective of our article is to investigate the reform of China's straw governance and examine the effectiveness of such reform with a specific focus on farmers in the Northeast China. We used both qualitative and quantitative approaches to investigate how China's straw governance reform was designed and implemented, and how effectiveness of such reforms in addressing the field straw‐burning issue in Northeast China. Field observation shows that the reforms were designed and implemented with two hybrid policy instruments: (a) a command‐and‐control (C&C) measures that used satellite‐based straw‐burning data to evaluate the straw‐burning monitoring performance of local governments and village committees and (b) a market‐based instruments (MBIs) that provide subsidies to the industries and cooperatives for sustainable straw use. The empirical results show that reform significantly decreased farmers' straw burning behavior and increased their straw field returning and straw bailing for power generation.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhiwei Yu & Fan Li & Wei Si & Weifeng Zhang, 2025. "From Agri‐Waste to Sustainable Use: A Case Study of Straw Management Reform in Northeast China," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 33(3), pages 3818-3830, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:33:y:2025:i:3:p:3818-3830
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.3315
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.3315
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.3315?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:33:y:2025:i:3:p:3818-3830. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.