IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/sustdv/v31y2023i2p1069-1083.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sustainable purchase intentions: The role of moral norm and social dominance orientation in the theory of planned behavior applied to the case of fair trade products

Author

Listed:
  • Luigina Canova
  • Andrea Bobbio
  • Anna Maria Manganelli

Abstract

The fair trade business model represents a strategy to achieve some of the sustainable development goals. The studies reported in this paper examined the intention formation process concerning the purchase of food and non‐food fair trade products. The theoretical framework is the theory of planned behavior (TPB), extended with an additional predictor, the moral norm, and an individual difference variable, the social dominance orientation (SDO). SDO is supposed to act as a background factor in the hypothesized TPB model and to be negatively associated with intention to buy fair trade products and its proximal antecedents (attitude, subjective norm, moral norm and perceived behavioral control). Considering the role of SDO within the TPB constitutes a novelty for the literature on socio‐cognitive determinants of purchase intentions. Data were supplied by two convenience samples of Italian adults and analyzed via path analysis. The test of the original TPB provided further evidence for its efficacy. Moral norm showed a significant effect on intentions and its addition to the original TPB model led to an increase in the explained variance in intentions. Overall, SDO proved to be significantly and negatively associated with the intention's antecedents and showed the expected negative indirect effects on intention, mediated by its proximal predictors and moral norm. These findings help to improve the comprehension of the socio‐psychological basis of behavioral intentions to engage in sustainable behaviors.

Suggested Citation

  • Luigina Canova & Andrea Bobbio & Anna Maria Manganelli, 2023. "Sustainable purchase intentions: The role of moral norm and social dominance orientation in the theory of planned behavior applied to the case of fair trade products," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(2), pages 1069-1083, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:31:y:2023:i:2:p:1069-1083
    DOI: 10.1002/sd.2441
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/sd.2441
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/sd.2441?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. A. Leeuw & Pierre Valois & Alexandre Morin & Peter Schmidt, 2014. "Gender Differences in Psychosocial Determinants of University Students’ Intentions to Buy Fair Trade Products," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 37(4), pages 485-505, December.
    2. Patrick Pelsmacker & Wim Janssens, 2007. "A Model for Fair Trade Buying Behaviour: The Role of Perceived Quantity and Quality of Information and of Product-specific Attitudes," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 75(4), pages 361-380, November.
    3. A. Beldad & S. Hegner, 2018. "Determinants of Fair Trade Product Purchase Intention of Dutch Consumers According to the Extended Theory of Planned Behaviour," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 41(3), pages 191-210, September.
    4. Daniel Hanss & Gisela Böhm & Rouven Doran & Andreas Homburg, 2016. "Sustainable Consumption of Groceries: the Importance of Believing that One Can Contribute to Sustainable Development," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 24(6), pages 357-370, November.
    5. Hyemi Lee & Yanhong Jin & Hyun Shin, 2018. "Cosmopolitanism and ethical consumption: An extended theory of planned behavior and modeling for fair trade coffee consumers in South Korea," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(6), pages 822-834, November.
    6. Valentina Carfora & Giulia Buscicchio & Patrizia Catellani, 2021. "Integrating Personal and Pro-Environmental Motives to Explain Italian Women’s Purchase of Sustainable Clothing," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-22, September.
    7. Anne Mook & Christine Overdevest, 2018. "Does Fairtrade Certification Meet Producers' Expectations Related to Participating in Mainstream Markets? An Analysis of Advertised Benefits and Perceived Impact," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(3), pages 269-280, May.
    8. Panico, Teresa & Verneau, Fabio & Capone, Vincenza & La Barbera, Francesco & Del Giudice, Teresa, 2017. "Antecedents of Intention and Behavior Towards Fair Trade Products: A Study on Values and Attitudes in Italy," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 8(2), March.
    9. Alvina Gillani & Smirti Kutaula & Leonidas C. Leonidou & Paul Christodoulides, 2021. "The Impact of Proximity on Consumer Fair Trade Engagement and Purchasing Behavior: The Moderating Role of Empathic Concern and Hypocrisy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 169(3), pages 557-577, March.
    10. Veronika Andorfer & Ulf Liebe, 2012. "Research on Fair Trade Consumption—A Review," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 106(4), pages 415-435, April.
    11. United Nations UN, 2015. "Transforming our World: the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development," Working Papers id:7559, eSocialSciences.
    12. Yan Han & HÃ¥vard Hansen, 2012. "Determinants of Sustainable Food Consumption: A Meta-Analysis Using a Traditional and a Structura Equation Modelling Approach," International Journal of Psychological Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 4(1), pages 1-22, March.
    13. Caroline Doran, 2010. "Fair Trade Consumption: In Support of the Out-Group," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 95(4), pages 527-541, September.
    14. Caroline Doran, 2009. "The Role of Personal Values in Fair Trade Consumption," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 84(4), pages 549-563, February.
    15. Jaap Sok & Joao Rossi Borges & Peter Schmidt & Icek Ajzen, 2021. "Farmer Behaviour as Reasoned Action: A Critical Review of Research with the Theory of Planned Behaviour," Journal of Agricultural Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 72(2), pages 388-412, June.
    16. P. Schenk, 2019. "A Matter of Principle: Comparing Norm-Based Explanations for Fair Trade Consumption," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 397-423, September.
    17. Stefan Borsky & Martina Spata, 2018. "The Impact of Fair Trade on Smallholders' Capacity to Adapt to Climate Change," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(4), pages 379-398, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Kutaula, Smirti & Gillani, Alvina & Leonidou, Leonidas C. & Christodoulides, Paul, 2022. "Integrating fair trade with circular economy: Personality traits, consumer engagement, and ethically-minded behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 1087-1102.
    2. Jisong Kim & Chang-Sik Kim & Mina Jo, 2023. "Cross-Country Analysis of Willingness to Pay More for Fair Trade Coffee: Exploring the Moderating Effect between South Korea and Vietnam," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(23), pages 1-22, November.
    3. Patrick Schenk & Jörg Rössel & Sebastian Weingartner, 2021. "It’s All about Distinction: The Lifestyle Embeddedness of Fair Trade Consumption," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(19), pages 1-22, October.
    4. Rommel Salvador & Altaf Merchant & Elizabeth Alexander, 2014. "Faith and Fair Trade: The Moderating Role of Contextual Religious Salience," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 121(3), pages 353-371, May.
    5. Alvina Gillani & Smirti Kutaula & Leonidas C. Leonidou & Paul Christodoulides, 2021. "The Impact of Proximity on Consumer Fair Trade Engagement and Purchasing Behavior: The Moderating Role of Empathic Concern and Hypocrisy," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 169(3), pages 557-577, March.
    6. Elena Kossmann & Mónica Gómez-Suárez, 2018. "Decision-making processes for purchases of ethical products: gaps between academic research and needs of marketing practitioners," International Review on Public and Nonprofit Marketing, Springer;International Association of Public and Non-Profit Marketing, vol. 15(3), pages 353-370, September.
    7. Francesca Colantuoni & Gianni Cicia & Teresa Del Giudice & Daniel Lass & Francesco Caracciolo & Pasquale Lombardi, 2016. "Heterogeneous Preferences for Domestic Fresh Produce: Evidence from German and Italian Early Potato Markets," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(4), pages 512-530, November.
    8. Veronika Andorfer & Ulf Liebe, 2012. "Research on Fair Trade Consumption—A Review," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 106(4), pages 415-435, April.
    9. P. Schenk, 2019. "A Matter of Principle: Comparing Norm-Based Explanations for Fair Trade Consumption," Journal of Consumer Policy, Springer, vol. 42(3), pages 397-423, September.
    10. Panico, Teresa & Verneau, Fabio & Capone, Vincenza & La Barbera, Francesco & Del Giudice, Teresa, 2017. "Antecedents of Intention and Behavior Towards Fair Trade Products: A Study on Values and Attitudes in Italy," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 8(2), March.
    11. Basso, Frédéric & Bouillé, Julien & Troiville, Julien, 2021. "Are you up for fair-trade products? Vertical dimension as a metaphorical representation of virtuous consumption," LSE Research Online Documents on Economics 111511, London School of Economics and Political Science, LSE Library.
    12. Basso, Frédéric & Bouillé, Julien & Troiville, Julien, 2021. "Are you up for fair-trade products? Vertical dimension as a metaphorical representation of virtuous consumption," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 508-518.
    13. Jingzhi Shang & John Peloza, 2016. "Can “Real” Men Consume Ethically? How Ethical Consumption Leads to Unintended Observer Inference," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 139(1), pages 129-145, November.
    14. David Bürgin & Robert Wilken, 2022. "Increasing Consumers’ Purchase Intentions Toward Fair-Trade Products Through Partitioned Pricing," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 181(4), pages 1015-1040, December.
    15. Gohary, Ali & Madani, Fatima & Chan, Eugene Y. & Tavallaei, Stella, 2023. "Political ideology and fair-trade consumption: A social dominance orientation perspective," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    16. Gwang-Suk Kim & Grace Lee & Kiwan Park, 2010. "A Cross-National Investigation on How Ethical Consumers Build Loyalty Toward Fair Trade Brands," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 96(4), pages 589-611, November.
    17. Ken Peattie & Anthony Samuel, 2018. "Fairtrade Towns as Unconventional Networks of Ethical Activism," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 153(1), pages 265-282, November.
    18. Stuart C. Carr & Ines Meyer & Mahima Saxena & Christian Seubert & Lisa Hopfgartner & Bimal Arora & Divya Jyoti & Robert Rugimbana & Heather Kempton & Leo Marai, 2022. "“Our fair trade coffee tastes better”: It might, but under what conditions?," Journal of Consumer Affairs, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 56(2), pages 597-612, June.
    19. von Meyer-Höfer, Marie & von der Wense, Vera & Spiller, Achim, 2013. "Characterising convinced sustainable food consumers," GlobalFood Discussion Papers 161887, Georg-August-Universitaet Goettingen, GlobalFood, Department of Agricultural Economics and Rural Development.
    20. Gunne Grankvist & Petri Kajonius & Bjorn Persson, 2016. "The Relationship between Mind-Body Dualism and Personal Values," International Journal of Psychological Studies, Canadian Center of Science and Education, vol. 8(2), pages 126-126, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:sustdv:v:31:y:2023:i:2:p:1069-1083. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1719 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.