IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/mgtdec/v46y2025i3p1835-1855.html

Land Misallocation and Urban Green Innovation: From the Perspective of Asymmetrical Innovation Theory

Author

Listed:
  • Hengzhou Xu
  • Fenghui Sun
  • Shuangliang Liu

Abstract

As the conflict between economic growth and environmental pollution intensifies, green innovation is gradually recognized as a pivotal strategy for promoting sustainable urban development. The unique institution is an important asymmetric resource for innovation activities, so delving into China's land institutional context represents a significant direction for both the theoretical understanding and practical application research of innovation in China. The existing framework inadequately explores the nexus between land misallocation (LM) and urban green innovation (UGI) and fails to reveal the underlying transmission mechanism fully. To bridge this gap, this paper utilizes city‐level data from China spanning 2007 to 2020, takes an asymmetric innovation perspective, and empirically tests the impact of two types of land misallocation, industrial LM and sectoral LM, on the relationship between UGI. The results reveal that LM has a significantly direct negative impact on UGI in China. The results are still robust after changing the sample size, substituting explanatory variables, replacing regression models, and running endogeneity tests. Additionally, the negative impact of LM exhibits heterogeneity within sectors and cities of different economic levels, administrative ranks, and dominant industries. The mechanism testing results indicate that LM affects UGI through structural, scale, and agglomeration effects. These conclusions enrich the literature on the impact of institutions on urban green innovation and provide valuable insights into the sustainable development of cities.

Suggested Citation

  • Hengzhou Xu & Fenghui Sun & Shuangliang Liu, 2025. "Land Misallocation and Urban Green Innovation: From the Perspective of Asymmetrical Innovation Theory," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 46(3), pages 1835-1855, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:46:y:2025:i:3:p:1835-1855
    DOI: 10.1002/mde.4485
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.4485
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/mde.4485?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zheng, Wenbo, 2023. "Land supply and industrial agglomeration: Extension of the new economic geography model with land elements incorporated," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    2. Muniba & Baorong Yu, 2023. "RETRACTED: Does Innovative City Pilot Policy Stimulate the Chinese Regional Innovation: An Application of DID Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 20(2), pages 1-21, January.
    3. Fu, Shihe & Xu, Xiaocong & Zhang, Junfu, 2021. "Land conversion across cities in China," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    4. Song, Malin & Xie, Qianjiao & Chen, Jiandong, 2022. "Effects of government competition on land prices under opening up conditions: A case study of the Huaihe River ecological economic belt," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    5. Wu, Xiaoxia & Huang, Yan & Gao, Jian, 2022. "Impact of industrial agglomeration on new-type urbanization: Evidence from Pearl River Delta urban agglomeration of China," International Review of Economics & Finance, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 312-325.
    6. Liu, Feng-chao & Simon, Denis Fred & Sun, Yu-tao & Cao, Cong, 2011. "China's innovation policies: Evolution, institutional structure, and trajectory," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 40(7), pages 917-931, September.
    7. Xiaowen Zeng & Ming Jin & Shuang Pan, 2022. "Do Environmental Regulations Promote or Inhibit Cities’ Innovation Capacity? Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(24), pages 1-21, December.
    8. Zhou, Di & Huang, Qing & Chong, Zhaohui, 2022. "Analysis on the effect and mechanism of land misallocation on carbon emissions efficiency: Evidence from China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    9. Yang, Jidong & Liu, Cheng & Liu, Kai, 2023. "Land marketization and industrial restructuring in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    10. Feng Han & Min Huang, 2022. "Land Misallocation and Carbon Emissions: Evidence from China," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(8), pages 1-30, July.
    11. Chen, Ting & Kung, J.K.-S., 2016. "Do land revenue windfalls create a political resource curse? Evidence from China," Journal of Development Economics, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 86-106.
    12. Zhang, Zhongqingyang & Mao, Ruixiang & Zhou, Zhongbao & Zeng, Zhijian, 2023. "How does digital finance affect green innovation? City-level evidence from China," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 58(PB).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yong Qi & Chi Zhang & Tingting Bai & Dong Xu, 2025. "The impact of industry-favoring land allocation strategy on urban carbon emissions: a city-level empirical study in China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(7), pages 15367-15391, July.
    2. Zhou, Di & Hu, Yanning & Xie, Dongchun & Sun, Qiong, 2023. "Land resource mismatch and energy efficiency: Evidence from 243 cities in China," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    3. Jiayu Liu & Feng Xu & Huan Wang & Xiao Zhang, 2023. "Investigating the Impacts of Built-Up Land Allocation on Carbon Emissions in 88 Cities of the Yangtze River Economic Belt Based on Panel Regressions," Land, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-15, April.
    4. Shengyan Xu & Yibo Chen & Miao Liu, 2025. "Can Urban Rail Transit in China Reduce Carbon Dioxide Emissions? An Investigation of the Resource Allocation Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(9), pages 1-32, April.
    5. Yugang Tang & Zhihao Su & Yilin Hou & Zhendong Yin, 2023. "Tax Streams, Land Rents and Urban Land Allocation," CESifo Working Paper Series 10812, CESifo.
    6. Sun, Hongliang & Chen, Jie & Wu, Yanbo & Wu, Youmeng, 2025. "Land use tournaments and urban green total factor productivity: Evidence from the reform in China," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 794-811.
    7. Pang, Jindong & Shen, Shulin & Zhou, Ningzhe, 2024. "The Spillover effect of government relocations on economic growth in Chinese cities," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 222(C), pages 104-122.
    8. Tinghui Li & Jiehua Ma & Bin Mo, 2021. "Does the Land Market Have an Impact on Green Total Factor Productivity? A Case Study on China," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-19, June.
    9. Shi, Haimeng & Li, Qiao & Zhang, Sun & Chen, Wei & Wang, Yanan & Shen, Yujie, 2024. "Does urban construction land in China achieve sustainable allocation and utilization?," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 144(C).
    10. Chen, Zeyu & Tang, Yuhong & Shen, Hebin & Liu, Jiali & Hu, Zheng, 2024. "Threshold effects of Government digital development and land resource disparity on Urban carbon efficiency in China," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    11. Yin, Kai & Yao, Xin, 2025. "How has China's urban compactness affected urban CO2 abatement costs?," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
    12. Lei Nie & Zhenzhen Ren & Yanrui Wu & Qizhou Luo, 2024. "Urban Industrial Land Misallocation and Green Total Factor Productivity: Evidence from China’s Yellow River Basin Regions," Economics Discussion / Working Papers 24-05, The University of Western Australia, Department of Economics.
    13. Shuhao Zhang & Xuetong Li & Daqian Shi, 2025. "How does digital finance affect energy consumption in China? Empirical evidence from China," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(5), pages 10719-10735, May.
    14. Zhou, Xiaoxiao & Jia, Mengyu & Li, Wenqing & Zhao, Xin & Gatto, Andrea & Ma, Xiaowei, 2024. "Higher education or scientific research: Which one contributes more to China's green innovation?," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 94(C).
    15. Ponomariov, Branco & Toivanen, Hannes, 2014. "Knowledge flows and bases in emerging economy innovation systems: Brazilian research 2005–2009," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(3), pages 588-596.
    16. Huasheng Song & Chao Zhang, 2024. "Land regulations, innovation and productivity: Firm‐level evidence from China," The World Economy, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 47(4), pages 1387-1426, April.
    17. Chen, Youlin & Wang, Lei & Yu, Peiheng & Cheng, Changxu, 2024. "Linkages between digital economy and ecosystem services: Revealing the spatiotemporal relationship based on U-shaped effect," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
    18. Liu, Shasha & Wu, Yuhuan & Kong, Gaowen, 2024. "Politics and Robots," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    19. Huang, Yong & Elahi, Ehsan & You, Jiansheng & Sheng, Yuhua & Li, Jinwei & Meng, Anchan, 2024. "Land use policy implications of demographic shifts: Analyzing the impact of aging rural populations on agricultural carbon emissions in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C).
    20. Bhatt, Vipul & Liao, Mouhua & Zhao, Min Qiang, 2023. "Government policy and land price dynamics: A quantitative assessment of China’s factor market reforms," Regional Science and Urban Economics, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:46:y:2025:i:3:p:1835-1855. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/7976 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.