IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/mgtdec/v41y2020i7p1365-1384.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal strategic alliance in multi‐echelon supply chains with open innovation

Author

Listed:
  • Madjid Tavana
  • Hannan Amoozad Mahdiraji
  • Moein Beheshti
  • Ali‐Asghar Abbasi Kamardi

Abstract

We propose a game‐theoretic approach to examine several possible coalition strategies in a four‐echelon supply chain consisting of a supplier, manufacturer, wholesaler, and retailer. A solitude model is used to probe the role of learning in quality improvements, and experimental design is conducted to evaluate all possible supply chain coalition strategies between echelons. The novelty of this study is the comprehensive evaluation of knowledge‐sharing strategies in collaborative supply chains. The results confirm that the Delta model with a coalition among a supplier, manufacturer, and retailer is the best strategy.

Suggested Citation

  • Madjid Tavana & Hannan Amoozad Mahdiraji & Moein Beheshti & Ali‐Asghar Abbasi Kamardi, 2020. "Optimal strategic alliance in multi‐echelon supply chains with open innovation," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(7), pages 1365-1384, October.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:41:y:2020:i:7:p:1365-1384
    DOI: 10.1002/mde.3181
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/mde.3181
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/mde.3181?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hua, Meina & Lai, Ivan Ka Wai & Tang, Huajun, 2019. "Analysis of advertising and a points-exchange incentive in a reverse supply chain for unwanted medications in households based on Game Theory," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 217(C), pages 259-268.
    2. Nagarajan, Mahesh & Sosic, Greys, 2008. "Game-theoretic analysis of cooperation among supply chain agents: Review and extensions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 187(3), pages 719-745, June.
    3. Felin, Teppo & Zenger, Todd R., 2014. "Closed or open innovation? Problem solving and the governance choice," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 43(5), pages 914-925.
    4. Walter, Achim, 2003. "Relationship-specific factors influencing supplier involvement in customer new product development," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 56(9), pages 721-733, September.
    5. Leckel, Anja & Veilleux, Sophie & Dana, Leo Paul, 2020. "Local Open Innovation: A means for public policy to increase collaboration for innovation in SMEs," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    6. Taleizadeh, Ata Allah & Sadeghi, Razieh, 2019. "Pricing strategies in the competitive reverse supply chains with traditional and e-channels: A game theoretic approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 215(C), pages 48-60.
    7. Narasimhan, Ram & Nair, Anand, 2005. "The antecedent role of quality, information sharing and supply chain proximity on strategic alliance formation and performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 96(3), pages 301-313, June.
    8. Ramanathan, Usha & Gunasekaran, Angappa, 2014. "Supply chain collaboration: Impact of success in long-term partnerships," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 147(PB), pages 252-259.
    9. Nagurney, Anna & Yu, Min, 2012. "Sustainable fashion supply chain management under oligopolistic competition and brand differentiation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(2), pages 532-540.
    10. Ata Allah Taleizadeh & Mahsa Noori-daryan, 2016. "Pricing, inventory and production policies in a supply chain of pharmacological products with rework process: a game theoretic approach," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 89-115, April.
    11. Zhang, Qingyu & Cao, Mei, 2018. "Exploring antecedents of supply chain collaboration: Effects of culture and interorganizational system appropriation," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 195(C), pages 146-157.
    12. Qu, Wen Guang & Yang, Zhiyong, 2015. "The effect of uncertainty avoidance and social trust on supply chain collaboration," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 68(5), pages 911-918.
    13. Abad, P. L., 1994. "Supplier pricing and lot sizing when demand is price sensitive," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 78(3), pages 334-354, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Fei Tang & Ying Dai & Zu‐Jun Ma, 2023. "Optimal joint trade‐in rebate strategies in a retailer‐led supply chain," Managerial and Decision Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 44(1), pages 399-415, January.
    2. Xiao Hu & Kaifang Fu & Zhixiang Chen & Zhijiao Du, 2022. "Decision-Making of Transnational Supply Chain Considering Tariff and Third-Party Logistics Service," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 10(5), pages 1-20, February.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Priom Mahmud & Sanjoy Kumar Paul & Abdullahil Azeem & Priyabrata Chowdhury, 2021. "Evaluating Supply Chain Collaboration Barriers in Small- and Medium-Sized Enterprises," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(13), pages 1-28, July.
    2. Alev Ozer Torgaloz & Mehmet Fatih Acar & Cemil Kuzey, 2023. "The effects of organizational learning culture and decentralization upon supply chain collaboration: analysis of covid-19 period," Operations Management Research, Springer, vol. 16(1), pages 511-530, March.
    3. Konur, Dinçer & Geunes, Joseph, 2016. "Supplier wholesale pricing for a retail chain: Implications of centralized vs. decentralized retailing and procurement under quantity competition," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 65(C), pages 98-110.
    4. Mohammad H. Eslami & Nicolette Lakemond, 2016. "Internal Integration In Complex Collaborative Product Development Projects," International Journal of Innovation Management (ijim), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(01), pages 1-28, January.
    5. Ata Allah Taleizadeh & Zahedeh Cheraghi & Leopoldo Eduardo Cárdenas-Barrón & Mahsa Noori-Daryan, 2021. "Studying the Effect of Noise on Pricing and Marketing Decisions of New Products under Co-op Advertising Strategy in Supply Chains: Game Theoretical Approaches," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-26, May.
    6. Jiayang Xu & Jian Cao & Yunfei Wang & Xiangrong Shi & Jiayun Zeng, 2020. "Evolutionary Game on Government Regulation and Green Supply Chain Decision-Making," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-25, February.
    7. Sudusinghe, Jayani Ishara & Seuring, Stefan, 2022. "Supply chain collaboration and sustainability performance in circular economy: A systematic literature review," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 245(C).
    8. Nina Shin & Jung-Sang Yoo & Ik-Whan G. Kwon, 2020. "Fostering Trust and Commitment in Complex Project Networks through Dedicated Investment in Partnership Management," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(24), pages 1-21, December.
    9. Eksoz, Can & Mansouri, S. Afshin & Bourlakis, Michael & Önkal, Dilek, 2019. "Judgmental adjustments through supply integration for strategic partnerships in food chains," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 20-33.
    10. Parlar, Mahmut & Weng, Z. Kevin, 2006. "Coordinating pricing and production decisions in the presence of price competition," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 170(1), pages 211-227, April.
    11. Matsui, Kenji, 2020. "Optimal bargaining timing of a wholesale price for a manufacturer with a retailer in a dual-channel supply chain," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(1), pages 225-236.
    12. Graziano Salvalai & Marta Maria Sesana & Paolo Dell’Oro & Diletta Brutti, 2023. "Open Innovation for the Construction Sector: Concept Overview and Test Bed Development to Boost Energy-Efficient Solutions," Energies, MDPI, vol. 16(14), pages 1-19, July.
    13. Ruile, Herbert, 2019. "Marktorientierte Wertschöpfungssysteme managen!," Marketing Review St.Gallen, Universität St.Gallen, Institut für Marketing und Customer Insight, vol. 36(1), pages 6-13.
    14. Anna Nagurney & Dong Li, 2014. "Equilibria and dynamics of supply chain network competition with information asymmetry in quality and minimum quality standards," Computational Management Science, Springer, vol. 11(3), pages 285-315, July.
    15. Simai He & Jay Sethuraman & Xuan Wang & Jiawei Zhang, 2017. "A NonCooperative Approach to Cost Allocation in Joint Replenishment," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 65(6), pages 1562-1573, December.
    16. Zhang, Lu & Cui, Li & Chen, Lujie & Dai, Jing & Jin, Ziyi & Wu, Hao, 2023. "A hybrid approach to explore the critical criteria of online supply chain finance to improve supply chain performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 255(C).
    17. Deyan Yang & Jinyong Wang & Dongping Song, 2019. "Channel Structure Strategies of Supply Chains with Varying Green Cost and Governmental Interventions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(1), pages 1-26, December.
    18. Yuchen Zhang & Wei Yang, 2022. "Breakthrough invention and problem complexity: Evidence from a quasi‐experiment," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 43(12), pages 2510-2544, December.
    19. Mohammad Ali Yamin, 2021. "Investigating the Drivers of Supply Chain Resilience in the Wake of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Empirical Evidence from an Emerging Economy," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(21), pages 1-16, October.
    20. Angélica Pigola & Priscila Rezende Costa, 2022. "In search of understanding about knowledge and learning on innovation performance," Scientometrics, Springer;Akadémiai Kiadó, vol. 127(7), pages 3995-4022, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:mgtdec:v:41:y:2020:i:7:p:1365-1384. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/7976 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.