IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/jnljam/v2015y2015i1n580361.html

Computing Assortative Mixing by Degree with the s‐Metric in Networks Using Linear Programming

Author

Listed:
  • Lourens J. Waldorp
  • Verena D. Schmittmann

Abstract

Calculation of assortative mixing by degree in networks indicates whether nodes with similar degree are connected to each other. In networks with scale‐free distribution high values of assortative mixing by degree can be an indication of a hub‐like core in networks. Degree correlation has generally been used to measure assortative mixing of a network. But it has been shown that degree correlation cannot always distinguish properly between different networks with nodes that have the same degrees. The so‐called s‐metric has been shown to be a better choice to calculate assortative mixing. The s‐metric is normalized with respect to the class of networks without self‐loops, multiple edges, and multiple components, while degree correlation is always normalized with respect to unrestricted networks, where self‐loops, multiple edges, and multiple components are allowed. The challenge in computing the normalized s‐metric is in obtaining the minimum and maximum value within a specific class of networks. We show that this can be solved by using linear programming. We use Lagrangian relaxation and the subgradient algorithm to obtain a solution to the s‐metric problem. Several examples are given to illustrate the principles and some simulations indicate that the solutions are generally accurate.

Suggested Citation

  • Lourens J. Waldorp & Verena D. Schmittmann, 2015. "Computing Assortative Mixing by Degree with the s‐Metric in Networks Using Linear Programming," Journal of Applied Mathematics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2015(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:jnljam:v:2015:y:2015:i:1:n:580361
    DOI: 10.1155/2015/580361
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/580361
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2015/580361?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marshall L. Fisher, 2004. "The Lagrangian Relaxation Method for Solving Integer Programming Problems," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(12_supple), pages 1861-1871, December.
    2. Michael Held & Richard M. Karp, 1970. "The Traveling-Salesman Problem and Minimum Spanning Trees," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 18(6), pages 1138-1162, December.
    3. Marshall L. Fisher, 2004. "Comments on ÜThe Lagrangian Relaxation Method for Solving Integer Programming ProblemsÝ," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 50(12_supple), pages 1872-1874, December.
    4. M. Piraveenan & M. Prokopenko & A. Y. Zomaya, 2009. "Local assortativity and growth of Internet," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 70(2), pages 275-285, July.
    5. P. Van Mieghem & H. Wang & X. Ge & S. Tang & F. A. Kuipers, 2010. "Influence of assortativity and degree-preserving rewiring on the spectra of networks," The European Physical Journal B: Condensed Matter and Complex Systems, Springer;EDP Sciences, vol. 76(4), pages 643-652, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Fatemeh Keshavarz-Ghorbani & Seyed Hamid Reza Pasandideh, 2022. "A Lagrangian relaxation algorithm for optimizing a bi-objective agro-supply chain model considering CO2 emissions," Annals of Operations Research, Springer, vol. 314(2), pages 497-527, July.
    2. Steeger, Gregory & Rebennack, Steffen, 2017. "Dynamic convexification within nested Benders decomposition using Lagrangian relaxation: An application to the strategic bidding problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 257(2), pages 669-686.
    3. Thomas L. Magnanti, 2021. "Optimization: From Its Inception," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 67(9), pages 5349-5363, September.
    4. Yanling Chu & Xiaoju Zhang & Zhongzhen Yang, 2017. "Multiple quay cranes scheduling for double cycling in container terminals," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(7), pages 1-19, July.
    5. Samadi, Mohammadreza & Nikolaev, Alexander & Nagi, Rakesh, 2016. "A subjective evidence model for influence maximization in social networks," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 59(PB), pages 263-278.
    6. Gregorio Rius-Sorolla & Julien Maheut & Sofia Estelles-Miguel & Jose P. Garcia-Sabater, 2021. "Collaborative Distributed Planning with Asymmetric Information. A Technological Driver for Sustainable Development," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(12), pages 1-23, June.
    7. Ahmadi-Javid, Amir & Hoseinpour, Pooya, 2015. "A location-inventory-pricing model in a supply chain distribution network with price-sensitive demands and inventory-capacity constraints," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 238-255.
    8. An, Yu & Zhang, Yu & Zeng, Bo, 2015. "The reliable hub-and-spoke design problem: Models and algorithms," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 103-122.
    9. Dollevoet, Twan & van Essen, J. Theresia & Glorie, Kristiaan M., 2018. "Solution methods for the tray optimization problem," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 271(3), pages 1070-1084.
    10. Alexandre Belloni & Mitchell J. Lovett & William Boulding & Richard Staelin, 2012. "Optimal Admission and Scholarship Decisions: Choosing Customized Marketing Offers to Attract a Desirable Mix of Customers," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 621-636, July.
    11. Zhizhu Lai & Qun Yue & Zheng Wang & Dongmei Ge & Yulong Chen & Zhihong Zhou, 2022. "The min-p robust optimization approach for facility location problem under uncertainty," Journal of Combinatorial Optimization, Springer, vol. 44(2), pages 1134-1160, September.
    12. Jiang, Yangsheng & Huangfu, Junjie & Xiao, Guosheng & Zhang, Yongxiang & Yao, Zhihong, 2025. "Energy-efficient trajectory design of connected automated vehicles platoon: A unified modeling approach using space-time-speed grid networks," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 314(C).
    13. Junming Liu & Weiwei Chen & Jingyuan Yang & Hui Xiong & Can Chen, 2022. "Iterative Prediction-and-Optimization for E-Logistics Distribution Network Design," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 34(2), pages 769-789, March.
    14. Zheng, Jianfeng & Meng, Qiang & Sun, Zhuo, 2014. "Impact analysis of maritime cabotage legislations on liner hub-and-spoke shipping network design," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 234(3), pages 874-884.
    15. Vasile BRĂTIAN, 2018. "Portfolio Optimization. Application of the Markowitz Model Using Lagrange and Profitability Forecast," Expert Journal of Economics, Sprint Investify, vol. 6(1), pages 26-34.
    16. Karademir, Cigdem & Beirigo, Breno A. & Atasoy, Bilge, 2025. "A two-echelon multi-trip vehicle routing problem with synchronization for an integrated water- and land-based transportation system," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 322(2), pages 480-499.
    17. Miguel A. Lejeune & John Turner, 2019. "Planning Online Advertising Using Gini Indices," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 67(5), pages 1222-1245, September.
    18. Claudio Gambella & Joe Naoum-Sawaya & Bissan Ghaddar, 2018. "The Vehicle Routing Problem with Floating Targets: Formulation and Solution Approaches," INFORMS Journal on Computing, INFORMS, vol. 30(3), pages 554-569, August.
    19. Zhang, Zhi-Hai & Jiang, Hai & Pan, Xunzhang, 2012. "A Lagrangian relaxation based approach for the capacitated lot sizing problem in closed-loop supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 140(1), pages 249-255.
    20. Xia, Jun & Wang, Kai & Wang, Shuaian, 2019. "Drone scheduling to monitor vessels in emission control areas," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 174-196.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:jnljam:v:2015:y:2015:i:1:n:580361. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/4185 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.