IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/hlthec/v7y1998i4p327-335.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sample size calculation in economic evaluations

Author

Listed:
  • Maiwenn J. Al
  • Ben A. Van Hout
  • Bowine C. Michel
  • Frans F.H. Rutten

Abstract

A simulation method is presented for sample size calculation in economic evaluations. As input the method requires: the expected difference and variance of costs and effects, their correlation, the significance level (α) and the power of the testing method and the maximum acceptable ratio of incremental effectiveness to incremental costs. The method is illustrated with data from two trials. The first compares primary coronary angioplasty with streptokinase in the treatment of acute myocardial infarction, in the second trial, lansoprazole is compared with omeprazole in the treatment of reflux oesophagitis. These case studies show how the various parameters influence the sample size. Given the large number of parameters that have to be specified in advance, the lack of knowledge about costs and their standard deviation, and the difficulty of specifying the maximum acceptable ratio of incremental effectiveness to incremental costs, the conclusion of the study is that from a technical point of view it is possible to perform a sample size calculation for an economic evaluation, but one should wonder how useful it is. © 1998 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Maiwenn J. Al & Ben A. Van Hout & Bowine C. Michel & Frans F.H. Rutten, 1998. "Sample size calculation in economic evaluations," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 7(4), pages 327-335, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:7:y:1998:i:4:p:327-335
    DOI: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199806)7:4<327::AID-HEC342>3.0.CO;2-U
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199806)7:43.0.CO;2-U
    Download Restriction: no

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Joseph C. Gardiner & Marianne Huebner & James Jetton & Cathy J. Bradley, 2000. "Power and sample assessments for tests of hypotheses on cost‐effectiveness ratios," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 9(3), pages 227-234, April.
    2. Meltzer, David, 2001. "Addressing uncertainty in medical cost-effectiveness analysis: Implications of expected utility maximization for methods to perform sensitivity analysis and the use of cost-effectiveness analysis to s," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 109-129, January.
    3. Martin W. McIntosh & Scott D. Ramsey & Kristin Berry & Nicole Urban, 2001. "Parameter solicitation for planning cost effectiveness studies with dichotomous outcomes," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 10(1), pages 53-66, January.
    4. Chiu, Singa Wang & Wang, Shan-Ling & Chiu, Yuan-Shyi Peter, 2007. "Determining the optimal run time for EPQ model with scrap, rework, and stochastic breakdowns," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 180(2), pages 664-676, July.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:7:y:1998:i:4:p:327-335. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Wiley Content Delivery). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/5749 .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.