IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/hlthec/v32y2023i3p639-653.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Medicare Part D coverage gap closure on utilization of branded and generic drugs

Author

Listed:
  • Judith Liu
  • Yuting Zhang
  • Cameron M. Kaplan

Abstract

The Affordable Care Act included a provision to gradually eliminate the Medicare prescription drug coverage gap between 2011 and 2020, which substantially lower medication costs in the gap. Using 2007–2016 Medicare claims data, we estimate how filling the gap affects individuals' out‐of‐pocket spending and medication use, separately for branded and generic drugs. One important difficulty in estimating the policy impact is that around the same time, many blockbuster drugs commonly used by the Medicare population experienced patent expiration and began to see generic entry. Because generic entries affected different therapeutic classes at different times, we run difference‐in‐differences models by therapeutic category at the beneficiary‐month level to isolate the effect of the gap closure from that of generic entry. Overall, we find that filling the gap substantially reduced out‐of‐pocket spending and increased the use of branded drugs, which had larger discount rates during the analysis period. Beneficiaries reaching the gap, at older ages, or with comorbidities experienced larger reduction in out‐of‐pocket spending. We show that without accounting for generic entry, the effect of filling the coverage gap on medication use is underestimated for branded drugs and overestimated for generic drugs.

Suggested Citation

  • Judith Liu & Yuting Zhang & Cameron M. Kaplan, 2023. "Effects of Medicare Part D coverage gap closure on utilization of branded and generic drugs," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(3), pages 639-653, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:32:y:2023:i:3:p:639-653
    DOI: 10.1002/hec.4637
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/hec.4637
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/hec.4637?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Aviva Aron-Dine & Liran Einav & Amy Finkelstein & Mark Cullen, 2015. "Moral Hazard in Health Insurance: Do Dynamic Incentives Matter?," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 97(4), pages 725-741, October.
    2. Mark Duggan & Fiona Scott Morton, 2010. "The Effect of Medicare Part D on Pharmaceutical Prices and Utilization," American Economic Review, American Economic Association, vol. 100(1), pages 590-607, March.
    3. Liran Einav & Amy Finkelstein & Paul Schrimpf, 2015. "The Response of Drug Expenditure to Nonlinear Contract Design: Evidence from Medicare Part D," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 130(2), pages 841-899.
    4. Randall P. Ellis, 1986. "Rational Behavior in the Presence of Coverage Ceilings and Deductibles," RAND Journal of Economics, The RAND Corporation, vol. 17(2), pages 158-175, Summer.
    5. Joyce, Geoffrey F. & Zissimopoulos, Julie & Goldman, Dana P., 2013. "Digesting the doughnut hole," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 32(6), pages 1345-1355.
    6. Lee Branstetter & Chirantan Chatterjee & Matthew J. Higgins, 2016. "Regulation and welfare: evidence from paragraph IV generic entry in the pharmaceutical industry," RAND Journal of Economics, RAND Corporation, vol. 47(4), pages 857-890, November.
    7. Keeler, Emmett B & Newhouse, Joseph P & Phelps, C E, 1977. "Deductibles and the Demand for Medical Care Services: The Theory of a Consumer Facing a Variable Price Schedule under Uncertainty," Econometrica, Econometric Society, vol. 45(3), pages 641-655, April.
    8. Hui Ding & Mark Duggan & Amanda Starc, 2021. "Getting the Price Right? The Impact of Competitive Bidding in the Medicare Program," NBER Working Papers 28457, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    9. Cameron M. Kaplan & Yuting Zhang, 2017. "Anticipatory Behavior in Response to Medicare Part D's Coverage Gap," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(3), pages 338-351, March.
    10. Courtney R. Yarbrough, 2020. "How protected classes in Medicare Part D influence U.S. drug sales, utilization, and price," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 29(5), pages 608-623, May.
    11. Kyoungrae Jung & Roger Feldman & A. McBean, 2014. "Demand for prescription drugs under non-linear pricing in Medicare Part D," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 19-40, March.
    12. Cameron Kaplan & Yuting Zhang, 2014. "The January Effect: Medication Reinitiation Among Medicare Part D Beneficiaries," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 23(11), pages 1287-1300, November.
    13. David B. Ridley & Chung-Ying Lee, 2020. "Does Medicare Reimbursement Drive Up Drug Launch Prices?," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 102(5), pages 980-993, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Toshiaki Iizuka & Hitoshi Shigeoka, 2018. "Free for Children? Patient Cost-sharing and Healthcare Utilization," NBER Working Papers 25306, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    2. Klein, Tobias J. & Salm, Martin & Upadhyay, Suraj, 2022. "The response to dynamic incentives in insurance contracts with a deductible: Evidence from a differences-in-regression-discontinuities design," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    3. Kairies-Schwarz, Nadja & Harrison, Glenn W. & Han, Johann, 2018. "Deductibles and Health Care Utilization: An Experiment on the Role of Forward-Looking Behavior," VfS Annual Conference 2018 (Freiburg, Breisgau): Digital Economy 181588, Verein für Socialpolitik / German Economic Association.
    4. Naomi C. Sacks & James F. Burgess & Howard J. Cabral & Steven D. Pizer, 2017. "Myopic and Forward Looking Behavior in Branded Oral Anti‐Diabetic Medication Consumption: An Example from Medicare Part D," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(6), pages 753-764, June.
    5. Klein, Tobias & Salm, Martin & Upadhyay, Suraj, 2020. "The Response to Dynamic Incentives in Insurance Contracts with a Deductible: Evidence from a Differences-in-Regression-Disconti," CEPR Discussion Papers 14552, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    6. Chan, Marc K. & Zeng, Guohua, 2018. "Unintended consequences of supply-side cost control? Evidence from China's new cooperative medical scheme," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 61(C), pages 27-46.
    7. Lin, Haizhen & Sacks, Daniel W., 2019. "Intertemporal substitution in health care demand: Evidence from the RAND Health Insurance Experiment," Journal of Public Economics, Elsevier, vol. 175(C), pages 29-43.
    8. Klein, Tobias J. & Salm, Martin & Upadhyay, Suraj, 2024. "Patient Cost-Sharing and Redistribution in Health Insurance," IZA Discussion Papers 16778, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    9. Randall P. Ellis & Wenjia Zhu, 2016. "Health Plan Type Variations in Spells of Health-Care Treatment," American Journal of Health Economics, University of Chicago Press, vol. 2(4), pages 399-430, Fall.
    10. Kyoungrae Jung & Roger Feldman & A. McBean, 2014. "Demand for prescription drugs under non-linear pricing in Medicare Part D," International Journal of Health Economics and Management, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 19-40, March.
    11. Kowalski, Amanda E., 2015. "Estimating the tradeoff between risk protection and moral hazard with a nonlinear budget set model of health insurance," International Journal of Industrial Organization, Elsevier, vol. 43(C), pages 122-135.
    12. Helmut Farbmacher & Peter Ihle & Ingrid Schubert & Joachim Winter & Amelie Wuppermann, 2017. "Heterogeneous Effects of a Nonlinear Price Schedule for Outpatient Care," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 26(10), pages 1234-1248, October.
    13. Hayen, Arthur P. & Klein, Tobias J. & Salm, Martin, 2021. "Does the framing of patient cost-sharing incentives matter? the effects of deductibles vs. no-claim refunds," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    14. Amitabh Chandra & Evan Flack & Ziad Obermeyer, 2021. "The Health Costs of Cost-Sharing," NBER Working Papers 28439, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    15. Ellis, Randall P. & Martins, Bruno & Zhu, Wenjia, 2017. "Health care demand elasticities by type of service," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 55(C), pages 232-243.
    16. Eliason, Marcus & Johansson, Per & Nilsson, Martin, 2019. "Forward-looking moral hazard in social insurance," Labour Economics, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 84-98.
    17. Haizhen Lin & Daniel W. Sacks, 2016. "Intertemporal Substitution in Health Care Demand: Evidence from the RAND Health Insurance Experiment," NBER Working Papers 22802, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    18. Guo, Audrey & Zhang, Jonathan, 2019. "What to expect when you are expecting: Are health care consumers forward-looking?," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 67(C).
    19. Eliason, Marcus & Johansson, Per & Nilsson, Martin, 2018. "Forward-looking moral hazard in social insurance: evidence from a natural experiment," Working Paper Series 2018:11, IFAU - Institute for Evaluation of Labour Market and Education Policy.
    20. Ed Westerhout & Kees Folmer, 2007. "Co-payment systems in health care; between moral hazard and risk reduction," CPB Discussion Paper 78.rdf, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:hlthec:v:32:y:2023:i:3:p:639-653. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/cgi-bin/jhome/5749 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.