IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/greenh/v11y2021i1p183-205.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A study on the impact of storage boundary and caprock morphology on carbon sequestration in saline aquifers

Author

Listed:
  • Masoud Ahmadinia
  • Seyed M. Shariatipour

Abstract

Structural trapping is known to be the primary storage mechanism in geological carbon sequestration (GCS), where the injected CO2 rises upwards due to buoyancy forces and becomes trapped under an ultra‐low permeability layer. Although it is relatively common in GCS studies to assume a planar caprock for the synthesised models, in a real scenario this is not always the case as the caprock might exhibit some small‐ or large‐scale topography changes. Moreover, little is known about the impact of the caprock morphology on the CO2 plume migration and the storage capacity. In this work, we performed a preliminary study of the effects of boundary conditions on the CO2 plume migration and dissolution. This was performed because most of the case study models which are employed for GCS studies are part of larger reservoirs. The obtained results were used in the simulation models of the second part of the work, to model an infinite‐acting reservoir appropriately. Three different volume modifier values of 105, 107 and 109 were considered on either one side or both sides of the reservoir for both horizontal and tilted caprock models. The CO2 dissolution in the tilted models was seen to be higher once the multiplier was on the opposite side of the slope. Horizontal models closed on one side (closed faults, salt walls, etc.) were also found to exhibit more significant dissolution than models which were open from both sides. We subsequently investigated the impact of caprock morphology on the CO2 plume advancement and its structural and dissolution trapping mechanisms by performing numerical simulations on nine synthetic models. The dissolution and migration distance are seen to be at a maximum for tilted reservoirs, where the CO2 has more space to migrate upwards and to interact with more formation water. The lowest dissolution occurred where the significant portion of the injected CO2 was trapped in a sand ridge or an anticline. Moreover, the possibility and also the amount of structural trapping was evaluated using an analytical method, and the results showed a fair match with the ones from the numerical simulation. We believe that this methodology could be applied for site screening prior to performing numerical simulations. © 2020 Society of Chemical Industry and John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Suggested Citation

  • Masoud Ahmadinia & Seyed M. Shariatipour, 2021. "A study on the impact of storage boundary and caprock morphology on carbon sequestration in saline aquifers," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 11(1), pages 183-205, February.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:11:y:2021:i:1:p:183-205
    DOI: 10.1002/ghg.2044
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ghg.2044
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/ghg.2044?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Masoud Ahmadinia & Seyed M. Shariatipour, 2020. "Analysing the role of caprock morphology on history matching of Sleipner CO2 plume using an optimisation method," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 10(5), pages 1077-1097, October.
    2. Hang Deng & Jeffrey M. Bielicki & Michael Oppenheimer & Jeffrey P. Fitts & Catherine A. Peters, 2017. "Leakage risks of geologic CO2 storage and the impacts on the global energy system and climate change mitigation," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 144(2), pages 151-163, September.
    3. repec:wkh:dmhout:v:9:y:2001:i:12:p:699-709 is not listed on IDEAS
    4. Calum Brown & Peter Alexander & Almut Arneth & Ian Holman & Mark Rounsevell, 2019. "Achievement of Paris climate goals unlikely due to time lags in the land system," Nature Climate Change, Nature, vol. 9(3), pages 203-208, March.
    5. Samin Raziperchikolaee & Mark Kelley & Neeraj Gupta, 2019. "A screening framework study to evaluate CO2 storage performance in single and stacked caprock–reservoir systems of the Northern Appalachian Basin," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 9(3), pages 582-605, June.
    6. Víctor Vilarrasa & Jonny Rutqvist & Antonio Pio Rinaldi, 2015. "Thermal and capillary effects on the caprock mechanical stability at In Salah, Algeria," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 5(4), pages 449-461, August.
    7. Richard S. Jayne & Hao Wu & Ryan M. Pollyea, 2019. "A probabilistic assessment of geomechanical reservoir integrity during CO2 sequestration in flood basalt formations," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 9(5), pages 979-998, October.
    8. Hossein Jahediesfanjani & Peter D. Warwick & Steven T. Anderson, 2017. "3D Pressure†limited approach to model and estimate CO2 injection and storage capacity: saline Mount Simon Formation," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 7(6), pages 1080-1096, December.
    9. Arts, R. & Eiken, O. & Chadwick, A. & Zweigel, P. & van der Meer, L. & Zinszner, B., 2004. "Monitoring of CO2 injected at Sleipner using time-lapse seismic data," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 29(9), pages 1383-1392.
    10. Ange‐Therese Akono & Jennifer L. Druhan & Gabriela Dávila & Theodore Tsotsis & Kristian Jessen & Samantha Fuchs & Dustin Crandall & Zhuofan Shi & Laura Dalton & Mary K. Tkach & Angela L. Goodman & Sco, 2019. "A review of geochemical–mechanical impacts in geological carbon storage reservoirs," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 9(3), pages 474-504, June.
    11. Juan Alcalde & Stephanie Flude & Mark Wilkinson & Gareth Johnson & Katriona Edlmann & Clare E. Bond & Vivian Scott & Stuart M. V. Gilfillan & Xènia Ogaya & R. Stuart Haszeldine, 2018. "Estimating geological CO2 storage security to deliver on climate mitigation," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 9(1), pages 1-13, December.
    12. Sallie Greenberg & Ozgur Senel & Robert Will & Robert J. Butsch, 2014. "Integrated reservoir modeling at the Illinois Basin – Decatur Project," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 4(5), pages 662-684, October.
    13. Fugang Wang & Jing Jing & Tianfu Xu & Yanlin Yang & Guangrong Jin, 2016. "Impacts of stratum dip angle on CO 2 geological storage amount and security," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 6(5), pages 682-694, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Jing, Jing & Yang, Yanlin & Cheng, Jianmei & Ding, Zhaojing & Wang, Dandan & Jing, Xianwen, 2023. "Analysis of the effect of formation dip angle and injection pressure on the injectivity and migration of CO2 during storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xiao, Ting & Chen, Ting & Ma, Zhiwei & Tian, Hailong & Meguerdijian, Saro & Chen, Bailian & Pawar, Rajesh & Huang, Lianjie & Xu, Tianfu & Cather, Martha & McPherson, Brian, 2024. "A review of risk and uncertainty assessment for geologic carbon storage," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 189(PB).
    2. Masoud Ahmadinia & Seyed M. Shariatipour, 2020. "Analysing the role of caprock morphology on history matching of Sleipner CO2 plume using an optimisation method," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 10(5), pages 1077-1097, October.
    3. Samin Raziperchikolaee & Vivek Singh & Mark Kelley, 2020. "The effect of Biot coefficient and elastic moduli stress–pore pressure dependency on poroelastic response to fluid injection: laboratory experiments and geomechanical modeling," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 10(5), pages 980-998, October.
    4. Jing, Jing & Yang, Yanlin & Tang, Zhonghua, 2021. "Assessing the influence of injection temperature on CO2 storage efficiency and capacity in the sloping formation with fault," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 215(PA).
    5. Mark E. Capron & Jim R. Stewart & Antoine de Ramon N’Yeurt & Michael D. Chambers & Jang K. Kim & Charles Yarish & Anthony T. Jones & Reginald B. Blaylock & Scott C. James & Rae Fuhrman & Martin T. She, 2020. "Restoring Pre-Industrial CO 2 Levels While Achieving Sustainable Development Goals," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(18), pages 1-30, September.
    6. Ajayi, Temitope & Awolayo, Adedapo & Gomes, Jorge S. & Parra, Humberto & Hu, Jialiang, 2019. "Large scale modeling and assessment of the feasibility of CO2 storage onshore Abu Dhabi," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 185(C), pages 653-670.
    7. Xin Zhao & Bryan K. Mignone & Marshall A. Wise & Haewon C. McJeon, 2024. "Trade-offs in land-based carbon removal measures under 1.5 °C and 2 °C futures," Nature Communications, Nature, vol. 15(1), pages 1-13, December.
    8. Samin Raziperchikolaee & Ashwin Pasumarti & Srikanta Mishra, 2020. "The effect of natural fractures on CO2 storage performance and oil recovery from CO2 and WAG injection in an Appalachian basin reservoir," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 10(5), pages 1098-1114, October.
    9. Changchang Liu & Chuxiong Deng & Zhongwu Li & Yaojun Liu & Shuyuan Wang, 2022. "Optimization of Spatial Pattern of Land Use: Progress, Frontiers, and Prospects," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(10), pages 1-22, May.
    10. R. Andrew Chadwick & David J. Noy, 2015. "Underground CO2 storage: demonstrating regulatory conformance by convergence of history‐matched modeled and observed CO2 plume behavior using Sleipner time‐lapse seismics," Greenhouse Gases: Science and Technology, Blackwell Publishing, vol. 5(3), pages 305-322, June.
    11. Zhang, Rongda & Wei, Jing & Zhao, Xiaoli & Liu, Yang, 2022. "Economic and environmental benefits of the integration between carbon sequestration and underground gas storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 260(C).
    12. Ghanbari, Saeed & Mackay, Eric J. & Heinemann, Niklas & Alcalde, Juan & James, Alan & Allen, Michael J., 2020. "Impact of CO2 mixing with trapped hydrocarbons on CO2 storage capacity and security: A case study from the Captain aquifer (North Sea)," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 278(C).
    13. Jing, Jing & Yang, Yanlin & Cheng, Jianmei & Ding, Zhaojing & Wang, Dandan & Jing, Xianwen, 2023. "Analysis of the effect of formation dip angle and injection pressure on the injectivity and migration of CO2 during storage," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    14. Kolditz, O. & Bauer, S. & Böttcher, N. & Elsworth, D. & Görke, U.-J. & McDermott, C.-I. & Park, C.-H. & Singh, A.K. & Taron, J. & Wang, W., 2012. "Numerical simulation of two-phase flow in deformable porous media: Application to carbon dioxide storage in the subsurface," Mathematics and Computers in Simulation (MATCOM), Elsevier, vol. 82(10), pages 1919-1935.
    15. Haoyu Dou & Xuelin Dong & Zhiyin Duan & Yinji Ma & Deli Gao, 2020. "Cement Integrity Loss due to Interfacial Debonding and Radial Cracking during CO 2 Injection," Energies, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-18, September.
    16. Halliday, Cameron & Hatton, T. Alan, 2020. "The potential of molten metal oxide sorbents for carbon capture at high temperature: Conceptual design," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 280(C).
    17. Connelly, D.P. & Bull, J.M. & Flohr, A. & Schaap, A. & Koopmans, D. & Blackford, J.C. & White, P.R. & James, R.H. & Pearce, C. & Lichtschlag, A. & Achterberg, E.P. & de Beer, D. & Roche, B. & Li, J. &, 2022. "Assuring the integrity of offshore carbon dioxide storage," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 166(C).
    18. Ouyang, Mingwei & Cao, Yan, 2023. "Utilizations of reaction exothermic heat to compensate the cost of the permanent CO2 sequestration through the geological mineral CO2 carbonation," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 284(C).
    19. Vafaie, Atefeh & Cama, Jordi & Soler, Josep M. & Kivi, Iman R. & Vilarrasa, Victor, 2023. "Chemo-hydro-mechanical effects of CO2 injection on reservoir and seal rocks: A review on laboratory experiments," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    20. Günther, Philipp & Ekardt, Felix, 2022. "Human Rights and Large-Scale Carbon Dioxide Removal: Potential Limits to BECCS and DACCS Deployment," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 11(12), pages 1-29.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:greenh:v:11:y:2021:i:1:p:183-205. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2152-3878 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.