IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/fufsci/v7y2025i3ne70029.html

Strategic Foresight in the Digital Transformation Era: Roadmapping Inspired by Design Thinking

Author

Listed:
  • Hung Nguyen
  • Shalini Mohanty
  • Jae‐Yun Ho

Abstract

Despite its usefulness as an innovation tool for strategic foresight, conventional roadmapping has several limitations in practice, such as linear tendency, poor articulation of value, difficulty and delay in implementation, and implicit certainty and persistent prejudice, as identified in existing literature. These limitations are further exacerbated in the digital transformation era due to radical and disruptive changes that fundamentally alter systems, calling for more innovative roadmapping practices for strategic foresight to navigate transformative changes. This study examines the potential of integrating design thinking principles and tools with roadmapping to address these challenges. An improved roadmapping process is proposed, by combining conceptual theories from a literature review of strategic roadmapping and design thinking. This process model is tested and further developed via an in‐depth case study of an airline company undergoing digital transformation, based on participant observation. Feedbacks and verification interviews demonstrate the benefits of the new roadmapping approach, which incorporates principles of design thinking (e.g., human‐centeredness, creative reframing, learning by doing, and divergence and convergence) and relevant tools (e.g., persona, customer journey map, and ideas menu) that are effective for forward‐oriented strategic decision making under uncertainty. The proposed roadmapping process can improve firms' strategic foresight by providing informed and practical guidance for systematically designing, organizing, and executing roadmaps in rapidly evolving and highly disruptive environments of digital transformation. This study advances the literature on strategic roadmapping, and enables academic researchers to further explore how design thinking principles and tool‐kits can enhance firms' foresight processes and capabilities in managing digital transformation.

Suggested Citation

  • Hung Nguyen & Shalini Mohanty & Jae‐Yun Ho, 2025. "Strategic Foresight in the Digital Transformation Era: Roadmapping Inspired by Design Thinking," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(3), December.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:fufsci:v:7:y:2025:i:3:n:e70029
    DOI: 10.1002/ffo2.70029
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ffo2.70029
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/ffo2.70029?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Marinković, Milan & Al-Tabbaa, Omar & Khan, Zaheer & Wu, Jie, 2022. "Corporate foresight: A systematic literature review and future research trajectories," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 289-311.
    2. Bernhard Wach & Jan O. Schwarz & Felix von Held, 2025. "Corporate foresight for the benefit of corporates' innovation climate," Futures & Foresight Science, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 7(1), April.
    3. Herbert A. Simon, 1996. "The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd Edition," MIT Press Books, The MIT Press, edition 1, volume 1, number 0262691914, December.
    4. Eoin O’Sullivan & Rob Phaal & Charles Featherston, 2021. "Agile Roadmapping: An Adaptive Approach to Technology Foresight," Foresight and STI Governance, National Research University Higher School of Economics, vol. 15(2), pages 65-81.
    5. Alberto Onetti & Antonella Zucchella & Marian Jones & Patricia McDougall-Covin, 2012. "Internationalization, innovation and entrepreneurship: business models for new technology-based firms," Journal of Management & Governance, Springer;Accademia Italiana di Economia Aziendale (AIDEA), vol. 16(3), pages 337-368, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Schuler, Benedikt Alexander & Murmann, Johann Peter & Beisemann, Marie & Satopää, Ville, 2025. "Individual foresight: Concept, operationalization, and correlates," International Journal of Forecasting, Elsevier, vol. 41(4), pages 1521-1538.
    2. Alan Hevner & Isabelle Comyn-Wattiau & Jacky Akoka & Nicolas Prat, 2018. "A pragmatic approach for identifying and managing design science research goals and evaluation criteria," Post-Print hal-02283783, HAL.
    3. Ali Zackery & Joseph Amankwah-Amoah & Zahra Heidari Darani & Shiva Ghasemi, 2022. "COVID-19 Research in Business and Management: A Review and Future Research Agenda," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-32, August.
    4. Tobias Knabke & Sebastian Olbrich, 2018. "Building novel capabilities to enable business intelligence agility: results from a quantitative study," Information Systems and e-Business Management, Springer, vol. 16(3), pages 493-546, August.
    5. Sunder Shyam, 2011. "Imagined Worlds of Accounting," Accounting, Economics, and Law: A Convivium, De Gruyter, vol. 1(1), pages 1-14, January.
    6. Fiori Stefano, 2005. "The emergence of instructions : some open problems in Hayek's theory," CESMEP Working Papers 200504, University of Turin.
    7. McCown, R. L., 2002. "Changing systems for supporting farmers' decisions: problems, paradigms, and prospects," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 74(1), pages 179-220, October.
    8. Jin P. Gerlach & Ronald T. Cenfetelli, 2022. "Overcoming the Single-IS Paradigm in Individual-Level IS Research," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 33(2), pages 476-488, June.
    9. Basile, Luigi Jesus & Carbonara, Nunzia & Pellegrino, Roberta & Panniello, Umberto, 2023. "Business intelligence in the healthcare industry: The utilization of a data-driven approach to support clinical decision making," Technovation, Elsevier, vol. 120(C).
    10. Loris Gaio, 2005. "A diversity-based approach to requirements tracing in new product development," ROCK Working Papers 031, Department of Computer and Management Sciences, University of Trento, Italy, revised 13 Jun 2008.
    11. B. A. Huberman & N. S. Glance, "undated". "Diversity and Collective Action," Working Papers _001, Xerox Research Park.
    12. Venkat Ram Reddy Ganuthula, 2025. "AI-enabled individual entrepreneurship theory: redefining scale, capability, and sustainability in the digital age," Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Springer, vol. 14(1), pages 1-21, December.
    13. Zhewei Zhang & Youngjin Yoo & Kalle Lyytinen & Aron Lindberg, 2021. "The Unknowability of Autonomous Tools and the Liminal Experience of Their Use," Information Systems Research, INFORMS, vol. 32(4), pages 1192-1213, December.
    14. Juval Portugali & Egbert Stolk, 2014. "A SIRN View on Design Thinking—An Urban Design Perspective," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 41(5), pages 829-846, October.
    15. Tamara P. Danko & Vladimir M. Kiselev & Lyubov A. Chaykovskaya & Pavel A. Smelov & Anna E. Gorokhova, 2020. "Marketing positioning of countries in the field of innovations: questions and answers," Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, VsI Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Center, vol. 7(4), pages 2851-2862, June.
    16. Gilbert Giacomoni & Adel Aloui, 2018. "Imaginaire et imitation du réel : genèse des idées et sciences de l’artificiel," Post-Print hal-01941661, HAL.
    17. Funk, Jeffery, 2009. "Components, systems and discontinuities: The case of magnetic recording and playback equipment," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 38(7), pages 1192-1202, September.
    18. Richard Holt & J. Barkley Rosser & David Colander, 2011. "The Complexity Era in Economics," Review of Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 357-369.
    19. David Stadelmann & Benno Torgler, 2012. "Bounded Rationality and Voting Decisions Exploring a 160-Year Period," Working Papers 2012.70, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    20. Frederico Oliveira Torres, 2019. "Firm heterogeneity and exports in Portugal - Identifying export potential," GEE Papers 0118, Gabinete de Estratégia e Estudos, Ministério da Economia, revised Apr 2019.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:fufsci:v:7:y:2025:i:3:n:e70029. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)2573-5152 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.