IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/corsem/v33y2026i1p1493-1510.html

How Do Firms Respond to Community Environmental Requirements? Corporate Commitment to Climate Change and the Role of Corporate Environmental Governance

Author

Listed:
  • Jeongki Lee
  • Jay Hyuk Rhee

Abstract

Research on corporate responses to climate change is becoming increasingly prevalent, as such responses are crucial for firms' survival and competitiveness. Although existing studies suggest stakeholder requirements as core drivers of corporate commitment to climate change, they fall short in explaining the mechanisms through which these requirements are translated into corporate responses. Drawing on signaling theory, this study addresses this gap by examining the signaling mechanisms between communities and firms, employing a multidimensional measurement and analyzing panel data using Poisson regression. The findings indicate that community engagement serves as a credible signal conveying community environmental requirements and facilitates corporate commitment to climate change, while heterogeneous firm responses are moderated by corporate environmental governance mechanisms. These results are consistent across multiple robustness tests. This study contributes to the existing literature on corporate commitment to climate change and signaling theory, offering academic and practical implications, and suggesting avenues for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Jeongki Lee & Jay Hyuk Rhee, 2026. "How Do Firms Respond to Community Environmental Requirements? Corporate Commitment to Climate Change and the Role of Corporate Environmental Governance," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 33(1), pages 1493-1510, January.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:33:y:2026:i:1:p:1493-1510
    DOI: 10.1002/csr.70247
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.70247
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/csr.70247?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michelle Rodrigue & Michel Magnan & Charles Cho, 2013. "Is Environmental Governance Substantive or Symbolic? An Empirical Investigation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 114(1), pages 107-129, April.
    2. Dixon, Robert & Mousa, Gehan A. & Woodhead, Anne, 2005. "The Role of Environmental Initiatives in Encouraging Companies to Engage in Environmental Reporting," European Management Journal, Elsevier, vol. 23(6), pages 702-716, December.
    3. Samuel Adomako & Mai Dong Tran, 2022. "Stakeholder management, CSR commitment, corporate social performance: The moderating role of uncertainty in CSR regulation," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5), pages 1414-1423, September.
    4. J. Kaler, 2006. "Evaluating Stakeholder Theory," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 69(3), pages 249-268, December.
    5. Kristel Buysse & Alain Verbeke, 2003. "Proactive environmental strategies: a stakeholder management perspective," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 24(5), pages 453-470, May.
    6. Dae-il Nam & Haemin Dennis Park & Jonathan D. Arthurs, 2014. "Looking Attractive until You Sell: Earnings Management, Lockup Expiration, and Venture Capitalists," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 51(8), pages 1286-1310, December.
    7. Xin Li & Fei Guo & Jiaqi Wang, 2024. "A path towards enterprise environmental performance improvement: How does CEO green experience matter?," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(2), pages 820-838, February.
    8. Samantha Miles, 2017. "Stakeholder Theory Classification: A Theoretical and Empirical Evaluation of Definitions," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 142(3), pages 437-459, May.
    9. Amemiya, Takeshi, 1981. "Qualitative Response Models: A Survey," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 19(4), pages 1483-1536, December.
    10. Jianqi Qiao & Suicheng Li & Antonio Capaldo, 2022. "Green supply chain management, supplier environmental commitment, and the roles of supplier perceived relationship attractiveness and justice. A moderated moderation analysis," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 31(7), pages 3523-3541, November.
    11. Thomas Thijssens & Laury Bollen & Harold Hassink, 2015. "Secondary Stakeholder Influence on CSR Disclosure: An Application of Stakeholder Salience Theory," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 132(4), pages 873-891, December.
    12. Sanjay Sharma & Irene Henriques, 2005. "Stakeholder influences on sustainability practices in the Canadian forest products industry," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 26(2), pages 159-180, February.
    13. Petra Christmann & Glen Taylor, 2006. "Firm self-regulation through international certifiable standards: determinants of symbolic versus substantive implementation," Journal of International Business Studies, Palgrave Macmillan;Academy of International Business, vol. 37(6), pages 863-878, November.
    14. Vincenzo Butticè & Veroniek Collewaert & Silvia Stroe & Tom Vanacker & Silvio Vismara & Xavier Walthoff-Borm, 2022. "Equity Crowdfunders’ Human Capital and Signal Set Formation: Evidence From Eye Tracking," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 46(5), pages 1317-1343, September.
    15. Judith L. Walls & Pascual Berrone & Phillip H. Phan, 2012. "Corporate governance and environmental performance: is there really a link?," Strategic Management Journal, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 33(8), pages 885-913, August.
    16. Julian Bafera & Simon Kleinert, 2023. "Signaling Theory in Entrepreneurship Research: A Systematic Review and Research Agenda," Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, , vol. 47(6), pages 2419-2464, November.
    17. James Heckman, 2013. "Sample selection bias as a specification error," Applied Econometrics, Russian Presidential Academy of National Economy and Public Administration (RANEPA), vol. 31(3), pages 129-137.
    18. Sara M. Constantino & Silvia Pianta & Adrian Rinscheid & Renato Frey & Elke U. Weber, 2021. "The source is the message: the impact of institutional signals on climate change–related norm perceptions and behaviors," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 166(3), pages 1-20, June.
    19. Zhao, Li & Zhang, Ling & Sun, Jianxin & He, Pengfei, 2022. "Can public participation constraints promote green technological innovation of Chinese enterprises? The moderating role of government environmental regulatory enforcement," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    20. Orts, Eric W. & Strudler, Alan, 2002. "The Ethical and Environmental Limits of Stakeholder Theory," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 12(2), pages 215-233, April.
    21. Giuliana Birindelli & Helen Chiappini, 2021. "Climate change policies: Good news or bad news for firms in the European Union?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(2), pages 831-848, March.
    22. Emanuele L. M. Bettinazzi & Maurizio Zollo, 2022. "Stakeholder Orientation and Experiential Learning: Evidence from Corporate Acquisitions," Journal of Management Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 59(6), pages 1422-1459, September.
    23. Habiba Al-Shaer & Mahbub Zaman, 2019. "CEO Compensation and Sustainability Reporting Assurance: Evidence from the UK," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 158(1), pages 233-252, August.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Yann Truong & Brian G. Nagy, 2021. "Nascent ventures’ green initiatives and angel investor judgments of legitimacy and funding," Small Business Economics, Springer, vol. 57(4), pages 1801-1818, December.
    2. Yasir Shahab & Ammar Ali Gull & Asad Ali Rind & Aitzaz Ahsan Alias Sarang & Tanveer Ahsan, 2022. "Do corporate governance mechanisms curb the anti-environmental behavior of firms worldwide? An illustration through waste management," Post-Print hal-03602986, HAL.
    3. Patricia Kanashiro, 2020. "Can environmental governance lower toxic emissions? A panel study of U.S. high‐polluting industries," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(4), pages 1634-1646, May.
    4. Gary F. Peters & Andrea M. Romi & Juan Manuel Sanchez, 2019. "The Influence of Corporate Sustainability Officers on Performance," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 159(4), pages 1065-1087, November.
    5. Marcos Carchano & Inmaculada Carrasco & Angela González, 2025. "Examining environmental proactivity in the Spanish wine industry: The moderating role of size," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(1), pages 127-157, January.
    6. Chuyao Deng & Wenliang Peng & Zhenjiang Dou & Qidi Zhang, 2024. "Environmental Background Directors and ESG Performance: A Perspective on Green Governance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(23), pages 1-22, December.
    7. Rasmi Meqbel & Mohammad Alta'any & Salah Kayed & Ahmed Al‐Omush, 2024. "Earnings management and sustainability assurance: The moderating role of CSR committee," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(3), pages 1769-1785, May.
    8. Yi-Hui Ho & Cheng-Kun Wang & Chieh-Yu Lin, 2022. "Antecedents and Consequences of Green Mindfulness: A Conceptual Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(11), pages 1-19, May.
    9. Peng Cheng & Jianye Zhang & Jiayi Chen & Yaoyue Zheng & Zhi Li, 2025. "Stakeholder attention and ambidextrous green innovation: Evidence from China," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 34(1), pages 1007-1026, January.
    10. Sharma, Revti Raman, 2025. "Environmental strategic role orientations of multinational enterprises: Different shades of green," Journal of International Management, Elsevier, vol. 31(5).
    11. Simon Nadel & Magali Savès, 2025. "Corporate governance and ecological investments. The case of French industry," Post-Print hal-05395432, HAL.
    12. Michaela Kotkova Striteska & Katerina Myslivcova & Viktor Prokop & Lucie Zapletalova, 2024. "Employees' engagement, family ownership, or gender diversity? Searching for determinants of SMEs' green behaviors in CEE countries," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(4), pages 3065-3080, July.
    13. Zhongtian Li & Jing Jia & Larelle (Ellie) Chapple, 2022. "The corporate sustainability committee and its relation to corporate environmental performance," Meditari Accountancy Research, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 31(5), pages 1292-1324, July.
    14. Li, Qian & Xue, Qiuzhi & Truong, Yann & Xiong, Jie, 2018. "MNCs' industrial linkages and environmental spillovers in emerging economies: The case of China," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 196(C), pages 346-355.
    15. Jesus Valero‐Gil & Tiberio Daddi & Sabina Scarpellini & Luca Marrucci, 2024. "Determinants and benefits of over‐certification: A signaling theory perspective," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 31(6), pages 5984-5999, November.
    16. Patrick Velte & Martin Stawinoga, 2020. "Do chief sustainability officers and CSR committees influence CSR-related outcomes? A structured literature review based on empirical-quantitative research findings," Journal of Management Control: Zeitschrift für Planung und Unternehmenssteuerung, Springer, vol. 31(4), pages 333-377, December.
    17. Bradbury, Michael & Jia, Jing & Li, Zhongtian, 2022. "Corporate social responsibility committees and the use of corporate social responsibility assurance services," Journal of Contemporary Accounting and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 18(2).
    18. Nardia Haigh & Andrew Griffiths, 2009. "The natural environment as a primary stakeholder: the case of climate change," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 18(6), pages 347-359, September.
    19. Le Luo & Qingliang Tang, 2021. "Corporate governance and carbon performance: role of carbon strategy and awareness of climate risk," Accounting and Finance, Accounting and Finance Association of Australia and New Zealand, vol. 61(2), pages 2891-2934, June.
    20. Rizwan Mushtaq & Ghulam Murtaza & Dorra Yahiaoui & Pereira Vijay & Qurat-ul-Ain Talpur, 2025. "Are born global firms environmentally more responsible? Evidence from the East Asia and Pacific region," Asia Pacific Journal of Management, Springer, vol. 42(2), pages 1061-1093, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:33:y:2026:i:1:p:1493-1510. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1535-3966 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.