IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/corsem/v32y2025i6p7571-7586.html

Driving Sustainable Consumption: Factors Influencing Consumer Acceptance of Cultured Meat

Author

Listed:
  • Veronica Ungaro
  • Maria Giovina Pasca
  • Federica Bisceglia
  • Laura Di Pietro
  • Roberta Guglielmetti Mugion
  • Gabriella Arcese

Abstract

Cultured meat is increasingly seen as a potential solution to the environmental and ethical challenges of the livestock industry; however, its market success depends largely on consumer acceptance. This study investigates the factors influencing consumers cultured meat acceptance as a means to support sustainable consumption and production patterns. An empirical study was developed in Italy through 18 in‐depth interviews and a structured questionnaire administered to a sample of 836 consumers. The Theory of Planned Behaviour model was employed as an analysis lens, and data were tested using structural equation modeling. The results reveal that attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control significantly influence consumers' intentions. Ethical and sustainability‐related benefits are key drivers of acceptance, while concerns persist regarding health and safety. The findings offer practical insights for companies and policymakers to promote informed consumer choices and foster responsible and sustainable behaviors while managing the introduction of cultured meat into the market.

Suggested Citation

  • Veronica Ungaro & Maria Giovina Pasca & Federica Bisceglia & Laura Di Pietro & Roberta Guglielmetti Mugion & Gabriella Arcese, 2025. "Driving Sustainable Consumption: Factors Influencing Consumer Acceptance of Cultured Meat," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(6), pages 7571-7586, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:32:y:2025:i:6:p:7571-7586
    DOI: 10.1002/csr.70096
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.70096
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/csr.70096?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nick Lin-Hi & Marlene Reimer & Katharina Schäfer & Johanna Böttcher, 2023. "Consumer acceptance of cultured meat: an empirical analysis of the role of organizational factors," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 93(4), pages 707-746, May.
    2. Mark Anthony Camilleri & Livio Cricelli & Roberto Mauriello & Serena Strazzullo, 2023. "Consumer Perceptions of Sustainable Products: A Systematic Literature Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(11), pages 1-18, June.
    3. Ruben Sanchez-Sabate & Joan Sabaté, 2019. "Consumer Attitudes Towards Environmental Concerns of Meat Consumption: A Systematic Review," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 16(7), pages 1-37, April.
    4. Verónica León‐Bravo & Antonella Moretto & Raffaella Cagliano & Federico Caniato, 2019. "Innovation for sustainable development in the food industry: Retro and forward‐looking innovation approaches to improve quality and healthiness," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(5), pages 1049-1062, September.
    5. Martin, M.J. & Thottathil, S.E. & Newman, T.B., 2015. "Antibiotics overuse in animal agriculture: A call to action for health care providers," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 105(12), pages 2409-2410.
    6. Rana, Jyoti & Paul, Justin, 2017. "Consumer behavior and purchase intention for organic food: A review and research agenda," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 38(C), pages 157-165.
    7. Benjamin Saunders & Julius Sim & Tom Kingstone & Shula Baker & Jackie Waterfield & Bernadette Bartlam & Heather Burroughs & Clare Jinks, 2018. "Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 52(4), pages 1893-1907, July.
    8. Nicolas Treich, 2021. "Cultured Meat: Promises and Challenges," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 79(1), pages 33-61, May.
    9. Rui Pedro Fonseca & Ruben Sanchez-Sabate, 2022. "Consumers’ Attitudes towards Animal Suffering: A Systematic Review on Awareness, Willingness and Dietary Change," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(23), pages 1-23, December.
    10. Sue Cassells & Kate Lewis, 2011. "SMEs and environmental responsibility: do actions reflect attitudes?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 18(3), pages 186-199, May.
    11. Clay M. Voorhees & Michael K. Brady & Roger Calantone & Edward Ramirez, 2016. "Discriminant validity testing in marketing: an analysis, causes for concern, and proposed remedies," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 44(1), pages 119-134, January.
    12. Nadia Palmieri & Maria Angela Perito & Claudio Lupi, 2020. "Consumer acceptance of cultured meat: some hints from Italy," Post-Print hal-03385175, HAL.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Maria Giovina Pasca & Gabriella Arcese, 2025. "Sustainability and Quality of Cultured Meat: Consumer Perceptions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(4), pages 1-18, February.
    2. Nick Lin-Hi & Marlene Reimer & Katharina Schäfer & Johanna Böttcher, 2023. "Consumer acceptance of cultured meat: an empirical analysis of the role of organizational factors," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 93(4), pages 707-746, May.
    3. Sun, Yuting & Zhang, Jianting & Li, Yixuan, 2024. "Realisation that online advertisements are misleading: Involvement of middle-aged and older adults with botanical dietary supplements," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    4. Arturo Nickolay Rojas-Tavara & Alberto Jesus Donayre-Torres, 2023. "Microalgae in lab-grown meat production," Czech Journal of Food Sciences, Czech Academy of Agricultural Sciences, vol. 41(6), pages 406-418.
    5. Dinh Van Hoang & Nguyen Ngoc Ngan Anh & Nguyen Thi Xuan & Pham Ngoc Han & Do Phuong Ngan & Nguyen Le Khanh Linh & Luu Nguyen Khoi & Vuong Thiet Tung & Trang Thi-Thuy Duong, 2025. "Pathways to Green Purchase Intention in FMCG Industry: A Combined Approach of PLS-SEM and fsQCA," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(3), pages 21582440251, September.
    6. Jennifer Tartaglia & Michelle McIntosh & Jonine Jancey & Jane Scott & Andrea Begley, 2021. "Exploring Feeding Practices and Food Literacy in Parents with Young Children from Disadvantaged Areas," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(4), pages 1-18, February.
    7. Najwa Taghy & Linda Cambon & Caroline Boulliat & Olivier Aromatario & Claude Dussart, 2021. "Exploring the Determinants of Polypharmacy Prescribing and Dispensing Behaviours in Primary Care for the Elderly—Protocol for a Qualitative Study," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(14), pages 1-10, July.
    8. Alexandra ZBUCHEA & Florina PÎNZARU, 2017. "Tailoring CSR Strategy to Company Size?," Management Dynamics in the Knowledge Economy, College of Management, National University of Political Studies and Public Administration, vol. 5(3), pages 415-437, September.
    9. Chen, Yanyan & Mandler, Timo & Meyer-Waarden, Lars, 2021. "Three decades of research on loyalty programs: A literature review and future research agenda," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 179-197.
    10. Wang, Le & Luo, Xin (Robert) & Li, Han, 2022. "Envy or conformity? An empirical investigation of peer influence on the purchase of non-functional items in mobile free-to-play games," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 308-324.
    11. Jianwen Zhang & Jacob Cherian & Yawar Abbas Sandhu & Jawad Abbas & Laura Mariana Cismas & Constantin Viorel Negrut & Lucia Negrut, 2022. "Presumption of Green Electronic Appliances Purchase Intention: The Mediating Role of Personal Moral Norms," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(8), pages 1-15, April.
    12. Van Droogenbroeck, Ellen & Van Hove, Leo, 2020. "Intra-household task allocation in online grocery shopping: Together alone," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 56(C).
    13. Thuy Séran & Anne-Sophie Fernandez & Hervé Chappert, 2024. "Managing coopetition in multi-unit organizations: a management-control perspective," Review of Managerial Science, Springer, vol. 18(10), pages 2889-2924, October.
    14. Anxin Xu & Chenwen Wei & Manhua Zheng & Lili Sun & Decong Tang, 2022. "Influence of Perceived Value on Repurchase Intention of Green Agricultural Products: From the Perspective of Multi-Group Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-17, November.
    15. Marcos Carchano & Inmaculada Carrasco & Angela González, 2025. "Examining environmental proactivity in the Spanish wine industry: The moderating role of size," Agribusiness, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 41(1), pages 127-157, January.
    16. Karina Soubra & Camilla Tamworth & Zeast Kamal & Clare Brook & Dawn Langdon & Jo Billings, 2023. "Health and social care workers experiences of coping while working in the frontline during the COVID-19 pandemic: One year on," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 18(4), pages 1-27, April.
    17. Sam Hampton & Richard Blundel & Aqueel Wahga & Tina Fawcett & Christopher Shaw, 2022. "Transforming small and medium‐sized enterprises to address the climate emergency: The case for values‐based engagement," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(5), pages 1424-1439, September.
    18. Mahadzirah Mohamad & Asyraf Afthanorhan* & Zainudin Awang & Morliyati Mohammad, 2019. "Comparison Between CB-SEM and PLS-SEM: Testing and Confirming the Maqasid Syariah Quality of Life Measurement Model," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, vol. 5(3), pages 608-614, 03-2019.
    19. De Noni, I. & Blasi, S. & Sabbadin, E., 2026. "Retrovation typology: Exploiting and exploring past knowledge for nostalgic and sustainable innovation," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 55(2).
    20. Maurizio Massaro & Francesca Dal Mas & Charbel Jose Chiappetta Jabbour & Carlo Bagnoli, 2020. "Crypto‐economy and new sustainable business models: Reflections and projections using a case study analysis," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 27(5), pages 2150-2160, September.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:32:y:2025:i:6:p:7571-7586. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1535-3966 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.