IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/corsem/v14y2007i4p206-218.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Islam and CSR: a study of the compatibility between the tenets of Islam, the UN Global Compact and the development of social, human and natural capital

Author

Listed:
  • John Zinkin

Abstract

Previous research has found that Muslims score elements that are assumed to matter in determining socially responsible business behaviour less highly than people of other religions. This paper looks at whether the tenets of Islam are the reason for this lower score by comparing and contrasting the UN Global Compact's ten principles with those of Islam in the affected areas. In so doing, the paper reconstructs the principles according to their impact on social, human and natural capital and explores whether Islam is supportive of responsible behaviour in these three areas. The paper concludes that, with the possible exception of Islam's focus on personal responsibility and non‐recognition of the corporation as a legal person, which could undermine the concept of corporate responsibility, there is no divergence between the tenets of the religion and the principles of the UN Global Compact. Focusing on this convergence of values could help avert the threatened ‘clash of civilizations’. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd and ERP Environment.

Suggested Citation

  • John Zinkin, 2007. "Islam and CSR: a study of the compatibility between the tenets of Islam, the UN Global Compact and the development of social, human and natural capital," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 14(4), pages 206-218, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:14:y:2007:i:4:p:206-218
    DOI: 10.1002/csr.161
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.161
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/csr.161?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Agle, Bradley R. & Van Buren, Harry J., 1999. "God and Mammon: The Modern Relationship," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 9(4), pages 563-582, October.
    2. Mervyn K. Lewis, 2001. "Islam and accounting," Accounting Forum, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 25(2), pages 103-127, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Dina M. Abdelzaher & Amir Abdelzaher, 2017. "Beyond Environmental Regulations: Exploring the Potential of “Eco-Islam” in Boosting Environmental Ethics Within SMEs in Arab Markets," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 145(2), pages 357-371, October.
    2. Chengli Shu & Hammad Bin Azam Hashmi & Zhenxin Xiao & Syed Waqar Haider & Mishal Nasir, 2022. "How Do Islamic Values Influence CSR? A Systematic Literature Review of Studies from 1995–2020," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 181(2), pages 471-494, November.
    3. Dina M. Abdelzaher & Amr Kotb & Akrum Helfaya, 2019. "Eco-Islam: Beyond the Principles of Why and What, and Into the Principles of How," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 155(3), pages 623-643, March.
    4. Qamar Farooq & Yunhong Hao & Xuan Liu, 2019. "Understanding corporate social responsibility with cross‐cultural differences: A deeper look at religiosity," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 26(4), pages 965-971, July.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Geoffrey Williams & John Zinkin, 2010. "Islam and CSR: A Study of the Compatibility Between the Tenets of Islam and the UN Global Compact," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 91(4), pages 519-533, February.
    2. S. Brammer & Geoffrey Williams & John Zinkin, 2007. "Religion and Attitudes to Corporate Social Responsibility in a Large Cross-Country Sample," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 71(3), pages 229-243, March.
    3. Johan Graafland & Corrie Mazereeuw-Van der Duijn Schouten, 2012. "Motives for Corporate Social Responsibility," De Economist, Springer, vol. 160(4), pages 377-396, December.
    4. Graafland, J.J. & Kaptein, M. & Mazereeuw V/d Duijn Schouten, C., 2010. "Motives of Socially Responsible Business Conduct," Other publications TiSEM 3053983b-5552-408c-86a4-b, Tilburg University, School of Economics and Management.
    5. Muhammad Salman Shabbir & Normalini Md Kassim* & Muhammad Faisal & Mazhar Abbas & Yousif Mousa Sabti, 2018. "Poverty Reduction through Islamic Modes of Finance; the Way Forward," The Journal of Social Sciences Research, Academic Research Publishing Group, pages 58-65:4.
    6. Daniel Badulescu & Muhammad Nouman Akhtar & Mumtaz Ahmad & Mariam Abbas Soharwardi, 2021. "Accounting Policies, Institutional Factors, and Firm Performance: Qualitative Insights in a Developing Country," JRFM, MDPI, vol. 14(10), pages 1-20, October.
    7. Chaudhry Ghafran & Sofia Yasmin, 2020. "Ethical Governance: Insight from the Islamic Perspective and an Empirical Enquiry," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 167(3), pages 513-533, December.
    8. Dominik Aaken & Florian Buchner, 2020. "Religion and CSR: a systematic literature review," Journal of Business Economics, Springer, vol. 90(5), pages 917-945, June.
    9. Muhammad Taimoor Hassan & Ambreen Kausar & Huma Ashiq & Hefza Inam & Humara Nasar & Rabia Amjad & Muhammad Arfan Lodhi, 2012. "Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure (A Comparison between Islamic and Conventional Financial Institutions in Bahawalpur Region)," International Journal of Learning and Development, Macrothink Institute, vol. 2(1), pages 628-642, February.
    10. Petya Koleva, 2021. "Towards the Development of an Empirical Model for Islamic Corporate Social Responsibility: Evidence from the Middle East," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 171(4), pages 789-813, July.
    11. Akrum Helfaya & Nasser Fathi Easa, 2022. "Islamic Religiosity and CSR Attitudes—The Case of Egyptian Managers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(18), pages 1-16, September.
    12. Zainuldin, Mohd Haniff & Lui, Tze Kiat, 2020. "Earnings management in financial institutions: A comparative study of Islamic banks and conventional banks in emerging markets," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 62(C).
    13. Ooi, Chai-Aun & Hooy, Chee-Wooi, 2022. "Muslim CEOs, risk-taking and firm performance," Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    14. Miltiadis Proios & Ioannis Proios, 2017. "The Influence of Religiosity on Moral Judgment in Sport," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-16, January.
    15. Shahid, Ahmad Usman & Patel, Chris & Pan, Peipei, 2022. "Corporate social responsibility, intrinsic religiosity, and investment decisions," Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Finance, Elsevier, vol. 34(C).
    16. Alharthi, Amal & Cortese, Corinne & Moerman, Lee & Tanima, Farzana, 2022. "Surveillance capitalism in the middle east retail sector," CRITICAL PERSPECTIVES ON ACCOUNTING, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    17. Nazia Adeel & Chris Patel & Nonna Martinov-Bennie & Sammy Xiaoyan Ying, 2022. "Islamic Religiosity and Auditors’ Judgements: Evidence from Pakistan," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(2), pages 551-572, August.
    18. Budiharto & Edy Sismarwoto, 2020. "Freedom of Contracts and Dispute Settlement Between Conventional Banking and Sharia Banking," International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), International Journal of Economics & Business Administration (IJEBA), vol. 0(1), pages 285-291.
    19. Victor Kane & Altay Dikeç & Jin Yong Park, 2017. "Cross-National CSR Web Reporting: A Comparative Analysis of Multinational Corporations in the U.S. and South Korea," Review of Pacific Basin Financial Markets and Policies (RPBFMP), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 20(01), pages 1-28, March.
    20. Roxana Loredana Dan & Alexandru Buglea & Cecilia Anis, 2015. "The main models of corporate governance," Proceedings of International Academic Conferences 3105360, International Institute of Social and Economic Sciences.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:corsem:v:14:y:2007:i:4:p:206-218. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1002/(ISSN)1535-3966 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.