IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/complx/v2022y2022i1n9577175.html

Overall Efficiency of Four‐Stage Structure with Undesirable Outputs: A New SBM Network DEA Model

Author

Listed:
  • Nasim Roudabr
  • Seyyed Esmaeil Najafi
  • Zohreh Moghaddas
  • Farzad Movahedi Sobhani

Abstract

Benchmarking is the major reason for the widespread use of DEA models for efficiency analysis. Determining the closest targets for DMUs, DEA models play a key role in benchmarking their best performance. In fact, these models help develop certain performance enhancement plans that need fewer attempts made by DMUs. Therefore, this study proposes a novel method based on the network DEA to determine the most appropriate target for every stage in addition to benchmarking the DMUs. The proposed model differs from those proposed by other studies in the fact that all DEA models of benchmarking consider input and output values to be linear. However, in real‐world problems, many DMU inputs and outputs have nonlinear values (values are the coefficients of inputs or outputs in modeling and can be the price of desirable outputs or the cost of inputs and undesirable outputs), something which was taken into account in the modeling process in this study. The proposed model was employed to benchmark cement factories listed on the Tehran Stock Exchange.

Suggested Citation

  • Nasim Roudabr & Seyyed Esmaeil Najafi & Zohreh Moghaddas & Farzad Movahedi Sobhani, 2022. "Overall Efficiency of Four‐Stage Structure with Undesirable Outputs: A New SBM Network DEA Model," Complexity, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2022(1).
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:complx:v:2022:y:2022:i:1:n:9577175
    DOI: 10.1155/2022/9577175
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9577175
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2022/9577175?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nasim Nasrabadi & Akram Dehnokhalaji & Pekka Korhonen & Jyrki Wallenius, 2019. "A stepwise benchmarking approach to DEA with interval scale data," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 70(6), pages 954-961, June.
    2. Charnes, A. & Cooper, W. W. & Rhodes, E., 1978. "Measuring the efficiency of decision making units," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 2(6), pages 429-444, November.
    3. Maria Silva Portela & Pedro Borges & Emmanuel Thanassoulis, 2003. "Finding Closest Targets in Non-Oriented DEA Models: The Case of Convex and Non-Convex Technologies," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 19(2), pages 251-269, April.
    4. W D Cook & F Yang & J Zhu, 2009. "Nonlinear inputs and diminishing marginal value in DEA," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(11), pages 1567-1574, November.
    5. Chiang Kao, 2017. "Network Data Envelopment Analysis," International Series in Operations Research and Management Science, Springer, number 978-3-319-31718-2, December.
    6. Lozano, Sebastián & Calzada-Infante, Laura, 2018. "Computing gradient-based stepwise benchmarking paths," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 195-207.
    7. Zhu, Qingyuan & Li, Xingchen & Li, Feng & Wu, Jie & Zhou, Dequn, 2020. "Energy and environmental efficiency of China's transportation sectors under the constraints of energy consumption and environmental pollutions," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    8. Ramón, Nuria & Ruiz, José L. & Sirvent, Inmaculada, 2020. "Cross-benchmarking for performance evaluation: Looking across best practices of different peer groups using DEA," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    9. Keskin, Burak, 2021. "An efficiency analysis on social prosperity: OPEC case under network DEA slack-based measure approach," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 231(C).
    10. Juan Aparicio & José Ruiz & Inmaculada Sirvent, 2007. "Closest targets and minimum distance to the Pareto-efficient frontier in DEA," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 28(3), pages 209-218, December.
    11. Yongjun Li & Xiao Shi & Ali Emrouznejad & Liang Liang, 2018. "Environmental performance evaluation of Chinese industrial systems: a network SBM approach," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 69(6), pages 825-839, June.
    12. Mahmoudabadi, Mohammad Zarei & Azar, Adel & Emrouznejad, Ali, 2018. "A novel multilevel network slacks-based measure with an application in electric utility companies," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 1120-1129.
    13. Li, Yongjun & Chen, Yao & Liang, Liang & Xie, Jianhui, 2012. "DEA models for extended two-stage network structures," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 40(5), pages 611-618.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Monge, Juan F. & Ruiz, José L., 2023. "Setting closer targets based on non-dominated convex combinations of Pareto-efficient units: A bi-level linear programming approach in Data Envelopment Analysis," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 311(3), pages 1084-1096.
    2. Kao, Chiang, 2022. "Closest targets in the slacks-based measure of efficiency for production units with multi-period data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 297(3), pages 1042-1054.
    3. Borrás, Fernando & Ruiz, José L. & Sirvent, Inmaculada, 2024. "Planning improvements through data envelopment analysis (DEA) benchmarking based on a selection of peers," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    4. Ramón, Nuria & Ruiz, José L. & Sirvent, Inmaculada, 2020. "Cross-benchmarking for performance evaluation: Looking across best practices of different peer groups using DEA," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 92(C).
    5. Lozano, Sebastián & Khezri, Somayeh, 2021. "Network DEA smallest improvement approach," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    6. Zhu, Qingyuan & Aparicio, Juan & Li, Feng & Wu, Jie & Kou, Gang, 2022. "Determining closest targets on the extended facet production possibility set in data envelopment analysis: Modeling and computational aspects," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 296(3), pages 927-939.
    7. J. Vakili & R. Sadighi Dizaji, 2021. "The closest strong efficient targets in the FDH technology: an enumeration method," Journal of Productivity Analysis, Springer, vol. 55(2), pages 91-105, April.
    8. Cook, Wade D. & Ruiz, José L. & Sirvent, Inmaculada & Zhu, Joe, 2017. "Within-group common benchmarking using DEA," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 256(3), pages 901-910.
    9. Kao, Chiang, 2020. "Measuring efficiency in a general production possibility set allowing for negative data," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 282(3), pages 980-988.
    10. Hernán P. Guevel & Nuria Ramón & Juan Aparicio, 2025. "Benchmarking and Target Setting in Weight Restriction Context," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-28, April.
    11. Tao, Xiangyang & Peng, Qiaoyu, 2025. "Moral hazard in data envelopment analysis benchmarking," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 327(1), pages 203-217.
    12. Kao, Chiang, 2022. "A maximum slacks-based measure of efficiency for closed series production systems," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    13. Zhang, Linyan & Chen, Kun, 2019. "Hierarchical network systems: An application to high-technology industry in China," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 82(C), pages 118-131.
    14. Peykani, Pejman & Seyed Esmaeili, Fatemeh Sadat & Pishvaee, Mir Saman & Rostamy-Malkhalifeh, Mohsen & Hosseinzadeh Lotfi, Farhad, 2024. "Matrix-based network data envelopment analysis: A common set of weights approach," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 95(C).
    15. Zhu, Qingyuan & Wu, Jie & Ji, Xiang & Li, Feng, 2018. "A simple MILP to determine closest targets in non-oriented DEA model satisfying strong monotonicity," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1-8.
    16. J L Ruiz & I Sirvent, 2011. "A DEA approach to derive individual lower and upper bounds for the technical and allocative components of the overall profit efficiency," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 62(11), pages 1907-1916, November.
    17. Fangqing Wei & Yanan Fu & Feng Yang & Chun Sun & Sheng Ang, 2023. "Closest target setting with minimum improvement costs considering demand and resource mismatches," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 23(3), pages 1-29, September.
    18. Le, Minh Hanh & Afsharian, Mohsen & Ahn, Heinz, 2021. "Inverse Frontier-based Benchmarking for Investigating the Efficiency and Achieving the Targets in the Vietnamese Education System," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    19. Shogo Eguchi & Hirotaka Takayabu & Mitsuki Kaneko & Shigemi Kagawa & Shunichi Hienuki, 2021. "Proposing effective strategies for meeting an environmental regulation with attainable technology improvement targets," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(7), pages 2907-2921, November.
    20. Chatzistamoulou, Nikos & Kounetas, Kostas & Tsekouras, Kostas, 2024. "Knowledge flows in Data Envelopment Analysis. The role of peer effects," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 129(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:complx:v:2022:y:2022:i:1:n:9577175. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/8503 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.