IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/complx/v2022y2022i1n9164404.html

An Epidemic Spreading Simulation and Emergency Management Based on System Dynamics: A Case Study of China’s University Community

Author

Listed:
  • Wei Rong
  • Ping Wang
  • Zonglin Han
  • Wei Zhao

Abstract

The spread of epidemics, especially COVID‐19, is having a significant impact on the world. If an epidemic is not properly controlled at the beginning, it is likely to spread rapidly and widely through the coexistence relationship between natural and social systems. A university community is a special, micro‐self‐organized social system that is densely populated. However, university authorities in such an environment seem to be less cautious in the defence of an epidemic. Currently, there is almost no quantitative research on epidemic spreading and response strategies in universities. In this paper, a case study of a university community is considered for a simulation of an infection evolving after an epidemic outbreak based on the method of system dynamics of the three stages. The results show the following: (1) By improving the speed of the initial emergency response, the total number of patients can be effectively controlled. (2) A quarantine policy helps to slow down the evolution of infection. The higher the isolation ratio, the higher the cost; therefore, the isolation ratio should be optimized. (3) It is important to make emergency plans for controlling epidemic spreading and carry out emergency drills and assessments regularly. According to the results of this study, we suggest an emergency management framework for public health events in university communities.

Suggested Citation

  • Wei Rong & Ping Wang & Zonglin Han & Wei Zhao, 2022. "An Epidemic Spreading Simulation and Emergency Management Based on System Dynamics: A Case Study of China’s University Community," Complexity, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2022(1).
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:complx:v:2022:y:2022:i:1:n:9164404
    DOI: 10.1155/2022/9164404
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/9164404
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2022/9164404?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Homer, J.B. & Hirsch, G.B., 2006. "System dynamics modeling for public health: Background and opportunities," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 96(3), pages 452-458.
    2. Xin-Jian Xu & Wen-Xu Wang & Tao Zhou & Guanrong Chen, 2006. "Geographical Effects On Epidemic Spreading In Scale-Free Networks," International Journal of Modern Physics C (IJMPC), World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd., vol. 17(12), pages 1815-1822.
    3. Bianchi, Geoffrey & Church, Richard L., 1988. "A hybrid fleet model for emergency medical service system design," Social Science & Medicine, Elsevier, vol. 26(1), pages 163-171, January.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Meimei Wang & Steffen Flessa, 2020. "Modelling Covid-19 under uncertainty: what can we expect?," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 21(5), pages 665-668, July.
    2. Hazhir Rahmandad, 2012. "Impact of Growth Opportunities and Competition on Firm-Level Capability Development Trade-offs," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 138-154, February.
    3. Erika Palmer, 2018. "The Heavy Cost of Care: Systemic Challenges in Norwegian Work Absenteeism," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-17, June.
    4. P. Daniel Wright & Matthew J. Liberatore & Robert L. Nydick, 2006. "A Survey of Operations Research Models and Applications in Homeland Security," Interfaces, INFORMS, vol. 36(6), pages 514-529, December.
    5. V Marianov & T B Boffey & R D Galvão, 2009. "Optimal location of multi-server congestible facilities operating as M/E r /m/N queues," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 60(5), pages 674-684, May.
    6. Simon K Chiu & Louise Freebairn & Louise A Baur & L. Kurt Kreuger & Adam Skinner & Jo‐An Occhipinti, 2023. "Modeling distribution parameters in system dynamics: an application in childhood obesity," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 39(2), pages 103-124, April.
    7. Hardcopf, Rick & Gonçalves, Paulo & Linderman, Kevin & Bendoly, Elliot, 2017. "Short-term bias and strategic misalignment in operational solutions: Perceptions, tendencies, and traps," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(3), pages 1004-1021.
    8. Therese Riley & Liza Hopkins & Maria Gomez & Seanna Davidson & Daniel Chamberlain & Jessica Jacob & Sonia Wutzke, 2021. "A Systems Thinking Methodology for Studying Prevention Efforts in Communities," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 34(5), pages 555-573, October.
    9. Zhe Zhao & Xin Xuan & Fan Zhang & Ying Cai & Xiaoyu Wang, 2022. "Scenario Analysis of Renewable Energy Development and Carbon Emission in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-13, September.
    10. Hassmiller Lich, Kristen & Urban, Jennifer Brown & Frerichs, Leah & Dave, Gaurav, 2017. "Extending systems thinking in planning and evaluation using group concept mapping and system dynamics to tackle complex problems," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 254-264.
    11. Bidhan Bhuson Roy & Qingshi Tu, 2022. "A review of system dynamics modeling for the sustainability assessment of biorefineries," Journal of Industrial Ecology, Yale University, vol. 26(4), pages 1450-1459, August.
    12. Negar Darabi & Niyousha Hosseinichimeh, 2020. "System dynamics modeling in health and medicine: a systematic literature review," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 36(1), pages 29-73, January.
    13. Emmanuel Yeboah-Assiamah & Kobus Muller & Kwame Ameyaw Domfeh, 2025. "Lessons from the past: a forest policy reform in Ghana through the feedback loop," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 3393-3413, February.
    14. Elizabeth Bruch & Jon Atwell, 2015. "Agent-Based Models in Empirical Social Research," Sociological Methods & Research, , vol. 44(2), pages 186-221, May.
    15. Mingers, John & White, Leroy, 2010. "A review of the recent contribution of systems thinking to operational research and management science," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 207(3), pages 1147-1161, December.
    16. Jing Yao & Alan T. Murray, 2014. "Locational Effectiveness of Clinics Providing Sexual and Reproductive Health Services to Women in Rural Mozambique," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 37(2), pages 172-193, April.
    17. McCormack, Richard & Coates, Graham, 2015. "A simulation model to enable the optimization of ambulance fleet allocation and base station location for increased patient survival," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(1), pages 294-309.
    18. Jenkins, Phillip R. & Lunday, Brian J. & Robbins, Matthew J., 2020. "Robust, multi-objective optimization for the military medical evacuation location-allocation problem," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    19. Anaely Aguiar, 2020. "The role of systematic reviews in the system dynamics modelling process," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 37(6), pages 892-895, November.
    20. Chao Zhang & Si Chen & Chunyang Wang & Yi Zhao & Min Ao, 2022. "Population Flow and Epidemic Spread: Direct Impact and Spatial Spillover Effect," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(1), pages 21582440211, January.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:complx:v:2022:y:2022:i:1:n:9164404. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/8503 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.