IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/gam/jscscx/v7y2018i6p94-d151177.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Heavy Cost of Care: Systemic Challenges in Norwegian Work Absenteeism

Author

Listed:
  • Erika Palmer

    (RURALIS—Institute for Rural and Regional Research, 7491 Trondheim, Norway)

Abstract

The cost of work absenteeism (sickness absence) is high in Norway (120 billion NOK), which threatens the economic sustainability of the Norwegian welfare state. Social sustainability is also challenged with women having a higher absenteeism rate than men. I use system dynamics modeling to explore how women attain a high rate of work absenteeism. Care work is the chosen case because this is the profession category where women are most represented. The results do not support the double burden theory, though several structural mechanisms indicate that competing theories of female absenteeism illustrate different sides of the same phenomenon.

Suggested Citation

  • Erika Palmer, 2018. "The Heavy Cost of Care: Systemic Challenges in Norwegian Work Absenteeism," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(6), pages 1-17, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:7:y:2018:i:6:p:94-:d:151177
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/7/6/94/pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2076-0760/7/6/94/
    Download Restriction: no
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Andersen, Torben M. & Holmström, Bengt & Honkapohja, Seppo & Korkman, Sixten & Söderström Hans Tson, & Vartiainen, Juhana, . "The Nordic Model. Embracing globalization and sharing risks," ETLA B, The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy, number 232, March.
    2. Maria Letizia Zanier & Isabella Crespi, 2015. "Facing the Gender Gap in Aging: Italian Women’s Pension in the European Context," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 4(4), pages 1-22, November.
    3. Lane, David C., 1999. "Social theory and system dynamics practice," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 113(3), pages 501-527, March.
    4. Nicole Hennum, 2014. "Developing Child-Centered Social Policies: When Professionalism Takes Over," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 3(3), pages 1-19, August.
    5. Homer, J.B. & Hirsch, G.B., 2006. "System dynamics modeling for public health: Background and opportunities," American Journal of Public Health, American Public Health Association, vol. 96(3), pages 452-458.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Milla Salin & Minna Ylikännö & Mia Hakovirta, 2018. "How to Divide Paid Work and Unpaid Care between Parents? Comparison of Attitudes in 22 Western Countries," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 7(10), pages 1-20, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Erika K. Palmer, 2017. "Structural Disadvantage: Evidence of Gender Disparities in the Norwegian Pension System," Social Sciences, MDPI, vol. 6(1), pages 1-15, February.
    2. Gemma Estrada & James Angresano & Jo Thori Lind & Niku Määttänen & William McBride & Donghyun Park & Motohiro Sato & Karin Svanborg-Sjövall, 2014. "Fiscal Policy and Equity in Advanced Economies: Lessons for Asia," Economic Growth Centre Working Paper Series 1414, Nanyang Technological University, School of Social Sciences, Economic Growth Centre.
    3. Meimei Wang & Steffen Flessa, 2020. "Modelling Covid-19 under uncertainty: what can we expect?," The European Journal of Health Economics, Springer;Deutsche Gesellschaft für Gesundheitsökonomie (DGGÖ), vol. 21(5), pages 665-668, July.
    4. Hazhir Rahmandad, 2012. "Impact of Growth Opportunities and Competition on Firm-Level Capability Development Trade-offs," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 23(1), pages 138-154, February.
    5. Thomas Aronsson & Sugata Ghosh & Ronald Wendner, 2023. "Positional preferences and efficiency in a dynamic economy," Social Choice and Welfare, Springer;The Society for Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 61(2), pages 311-337, August.
    6. Dehua Li & Fei Yi, 2025. "The Gender Differences in Pension Wealth of Individual Retirement Accounts in China," Journal of Economic Statistics, Anser Press, vol. 3(1), pages 17-31, March.
    7. Natalia Brzezina & Birgit Kopainsky & Erik Mathijs, 2016. "Can Organic Farming Reduce Vulnerabilities and Enhance the Resilience of the European Food System? A Critical Assessment Using System Dynamics Structural Thinking Tools," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 8(10), pages 1-32, September.
    8. Ghaffarzadegan, Navid & Xue, Yi & Larson, Richard C., 2017. "Work-education mismatch: An endogenous theory of professionalization," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 261(3), pages 1085-1097.
    9. David C. Lane, 2012. "What Is a ‘Policy Insight’?," Systems Research and Behavioral Science, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 29(6), pages 590-595, November.
    10. Rauhut Daniel & Kahila Petri, 2012. "Youth Unemployment, Ageing and Regional Welfare: The Regional Labour Market Policy Response to Ageing in Sweden," European Spatial Research and Policy, Sciendo, vol. 19(1), pages 111-127, July.
    11. Simon K Chiu & Louise Freebairn & Louise A Baur & L. Kurt Kreuger & Adam Skinner & Jo‐An Occhipinti, 2023. "Modeling distribution parameters in system dynamics: an application in childhood obesity," System Dynamics Review, System Dynamics Society, vol. 39(2), pages 103-124, April.
    12. Anu Kantola & Johannes Kananen, 2013. "Seize the Moment: Financial Crisis and the Making of the Finnish Competition State," New Political Economy, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(6), pages 811-826, December.
    13. Mehmet F. Aysan & Roderic Beaujot, 2009. "Welfare Regimes for Aging Populations: No Single Path for Reform," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 35(4), pages 701-720, December.
    14. John Komlos, 2022. "Running the U.S. Economy at Full Throttle Is a Stressful Variant of Capitalism," CESifo Working Paper Series 9966, CESifo.
    15. Hardcopf, Rick & Gonçalves, Paulo & Linderman, Kevin & Bendoly, Elliot, 2017. "Short-term bias and strategic misalignment in operational solutions: Perceptions, tendencies, and traps," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 258(3), pages 1004-1021.
    16. Therese Riley & Liza Hopkins & Maria Gomez & Seanna Davidson & Daniel Chamberlain & Jessica Jacob & Sonia Wutzke, 2021. "A Systems Thinking Methodology for Studying Prevention Efforts in Communities," Systemic Practice and Action Research, Springer, vol. 34(5), pages 555-573, October.
    17. Bertola, Giuseppe, 2008. "Labour Markets in EMU - What has Changed and What Needs to Change," CEPR Discussion Papers 7049, C.E.P.R. Discussion Papers.
    18. Zhe Zhao & Xin Xuan & Fan Zhang & Ying Cai & Xiaoyu Wang, 2022. "Scenario Analysis of Renewable Energy Development and Carbon Emission in the Beijing–Tianjin–Hebei Region," Land, MDPI, vol. 11(10), pages 1-13, September.
    19. Hassmiller Lich, Kristen & Urban, Jennifer Brown & Frerichs, Leah & Dave, Gaurav, 2017. "Extending systems thinking in planning and evaluation using group concept mapping and system dynamics to tackle complex problems," Evaluation and Program Planning, Elsevier, vol. 60(C), pages 254-264.
    20. Xu Chen & Ying Zhao & Song Xue, 2024. "A Study on the Dynamic Evolution Paths of Social Risks in PPP Projects of Water Environmental Governance—From the Vulnerability Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(10), pages 1-22, May.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:gam:jscscx:v:7:y:2018:i:6:p:94-:d:151177. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: MDPI Indexing Manager (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.mdpi.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.