IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/complx/v2022y2022i1n4032957.html

Vulnerability Evaluation and Improvement Method of Civil Aviation Navigation Network

Author

Listed:
  • Tingyu Gong
  • Songchen Han
  • Kunshan Yang

Abstract

Due to events such as natural disasters and navigation equipment failures, enormous calamity may be caused by the interruption of the navigation network which is a guarantee for the flight safety of civil aviation aircraft. The navigation network consists of the navigation stations as nodes and the routes between them as edges. Different nodes have different effects on the vulnerability of the network due to their different abilities to maintain the stability of the network topology and the normal function of the network. To quantify this difference and identify key nodes that have a greater impact on the vulnerability of the navigation network, an indicator to assess the importance of a navigation station is proposed which combines the structural importance reflected by node topology centrality and functional importance reflected by node weight. The structural importance of a node corresponds to its topology features including local dominance of the node and its global influence, and the important contribution to both adjacent and nonadjacent nodes from this node, while the functional importance is indicated by the flight flow serviced by the node during a fixed period of time. Vulnerability evaluation shows that the navigation network is more vulnerable when subject to the intentional attack of nodes with higher comprehensive node importance than an intentional attack of nodes with a larger value of indicators used in previous literature. Finally, the vulnerability of the navigation network is improved through changing the topology of the most critical node and balancing the node importance of the whole network.

Suggested Citation

  • Tingyu Gong & Songchen Han & Kunshan Yang, 2022. "Vulnerability Evaluation and Improvement Method of Civil Aviation Navigation Network," Complexity, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 2022(1).
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:complx:v:2022:y:2022:i:1:n:4032957
    DOI: 10.1155/2022/4032957
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1155/2022/4032957
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1155/2022/4032957?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Jenelius, Erik, 2009. "Network structure and travel patterns: explaining the geographical disparities of road network vulnerability," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 234-244.
    2. Hsieh, Cheng-Hsien & Feng, Cheng-Min, 2020. "The highway resilience and vulnerability in Taiwan," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 87(C), pages 1-9.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Haritha, P.C. & Anjaneyulu, M.V.L.R., 2026. "A simple and efficient pre-selection method for partial network scan in critical link identification," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 265(PB).
    2. Jiayu Ding & Yuewei Wang & Chaoyue Li, 2024. "A Dual-Layer Complex Network-Based Quantitative Flood Vulnerability Assessment Method of Transportation Systems," Land, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-27, May.
    3. Marta Contreras & Alondra Chamorro & Nikole Guerrero & Carolina Martínez & Tomás Echaveguren & Eduardo Allen & Nicolás C. Bronfman, 2025. "Risk Management of Rural Road Networks Exposed to Natural Hazards: Integrating Social Vulnerability and Critical Infrastructure Access in Decision-Making," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(15), pages 1-23, August.
    4. Jenelius, Erik & Mattsson, Lars-Göran, 2012. "Road network vulnerability analysis of area-covering disruptions: A grid-based approach with case study," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(5), pages 746-760.
    5. Erik Jenelius & Lars-Göran Mattsson, 2011. "The impact of network density, travel and location patterns on regional road network vulnerability," ERSA conference papers ersa10p448, European Regional Science Association.
    6. Rolf Nyberg & Magnus Johansson, 2013. "Indicators of road network vulnerability to storm-felled trees," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 69(1), pages 185-199, October.
    7. Kammouh, Omar & Gardoni, Paolo & Cimellaro, Gian Paolo, 2020. "Probabilistic framework to evaluate the resilience of engineering systems using Bayesian and dynamic Bayesian networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    8. Haritha, P.C. & Anjaneyulu, M.V.L.R., 2024. "Comparison of topological functionality-based resilience metrics using link criticality," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    9. Rodríguez-Núñez, Eduardo & García-Palomares, Juan Carlos, 2014. "Measuring the vulnerability of public transport networks," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 35(C), pages 50-63.
    10. Klaus Eisenack & Rebecca Stecker & Diana Reckien & Esther Hoffmann, 2012. "Adaptation to climate change in the transport sector: a review of actions and actors," Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, Springer, vol. 17(5), pages 451-469, June.
    11. Jie Song & Zhong-Ren Peng & Liyuan Zhao & Chih-Hung Hsu, 2016. "Developing a theoretical framework for integrated vulnerability of businesses to sea level rise," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 84(2), pages 1219-1239, November.
    12. López, Fernando A. & Páez, Antonio & Carrasco, Juan A. & Ruminot, Natalia A., 2017. "Vulnerability of nodes under controlled network topology and flow autocorrelation conditions," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 77-87.
    13. Kashin Sugishita & Yasuo Asakura, 2021. "Vulnerability studies in the fields of transportation and complex networks: a citation network analysis," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-34, March.
    14. Chao Fang & Piao Dong & Yi-Ping Fang & Enrico Zio, 2020. "Vulnerability analysis of critical infrastructure under disruptions: An application to China Railway High-speed," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 234(2), pages 235-245, April.
    15. Fang, Zhixiang & Shaw, Shih-Lung & Tu, Wei & Li, Qingquan & Li, Yuguang, 2012. "Spatiotemporal analysis of critical transportation links based on time geographic concepts: a case study of critical bridges in Wuhan, China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 23(C), pages 44-59.
    16. Pan, Shouzheng & Yan, Hai & He, Jia & He, Zhengbing, 2021. "Vulnerability and resilience of transportation systems: A recent literature review," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 581(C).
    17. Antipova, Anzhelika & Wilmot, Chester, 2012. "Alternative approaches for reducing congestion in Baton Rouge, Louisiana," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 24(C), pages 404-410.
    18. Khademi, Navid & Babaei, Mohsen & Schmöcker, Jan-Dirk & Fani, Amirhossein, 2018. "Analysis of incident costs in a vulnerable sparse rail network – Description and Iran case study," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 9-27.
    19. Balijepalli, Chandra & Oppong, Olivia, 2014. "Measuring vulnerability of road network considering the extent of serviceability of critical road links in urban areas," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 39(C), pages 145-155.
    20. Contreras, Marta & Chamorro, Alondra & Gómez, Trinidad & Echaveguren, Tomás & Molinos-Senante, María, 2025. "Bridging technical and social dimensions in critical infrastructure accessibility assessment: A case study from Chile," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:complx:v:2022:y:2022:i:1:n:4032957. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/8503 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.