IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/kap/jgeosy/v22y2020i3d10.1007_s10109-020-00320-8.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Examining the robustness of the Ontario truck road network

Author

Listed:
  • Georgiana Madar

    (University of Windsor)

  • Hanna Maoh

    (University of Windsor)

  • William Anderson

    (University of Windsor)

Abstract

Robust road transportation networks are essential to facilitate truck movements between regions. Disruptions along certain road links could degrade the network’s robustness and curtail regional commerce. A network is considered robust if the network-wide travel cost does not change significantly before and after disruptions. The network robustness index (NRI) is a well-known measure for examining the effect of reduced capacity on one or more links. It has been mainly applied to urban networks and passenger trips. In this paper, the NRI is applied to assess the robustness of the Ontario-wide truck network. Truck flows between the 49 census divisions within Ontario and 25 external zones for the year 2012 are modeled on the network of 35,254 road links and 14,444 associated nodes. Several scenarios of incrementally reduced capacity on specific critical links are devised and simulated. The NRI is calculated for each scenario to identify the level of network robustness. The locational effects of the capacity reductions were explored with the help of maps to assess the change in traffic volumes of the simulated scenarios relative to the base case. As expected, traffic diffuses or shifts to neighboring links when capacities are reduced. These results can be useful in infrastructure planning and the design of alternative routes to minimize the negative impact on traffic flows when disruptions occur.

Suggested Citation

  • Georgiana Madar & Hanna Maoh & William Anderson, 2020. "Examining the robustness of the Ontario truck road network," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 22(3), pages 309-333, July.
    • Handle: RePEc:kap:jgeosy:v:22:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s10109-020-00320-8
    DOI: 10.1007/s10109-020-00320-8
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s10109-020-00320-8
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1007/s10109-020-00320-8?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Unknown, 2012. "Transportation Research Forum," 53rd Annual Transportation Research Forum, Tampa, Florida, March 15-17, 2012 207218, Transportation Research Forum.
    2. Zhang, X. & Miller-Hooks, E. & Denny, K., 2015. "Assessing the role of network topology in transportation network resilience," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 46(C), pages 35-45.
    3. Burke, Charles M. & Scott, Darren M., 2016. "The space race: A framework to evaluate the potential travel-time impacts of reallocating road space to bicycle facilities," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 56(C), pages 110-119.
    4. Jenelius, Erik, 2009. "Network structure and travel patterns: explaining the geographical disparities of road network vulnerability," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 17(3), pages 234-244.
    5. Sullivan, J.L. & Novak, D.C. & Aultman-Hall, L. & Scott, D.M., 2010. "Identifying critical road segments and measuring system-wide robustness in transportation networks with isolating links: A link-based capacity-reduction approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 44(5), pages 323-336, June.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Juanjuan Luo & Teng Fei & Meng Tian & Yifei Liu & Meng Bian, 2023. "Sensitivity metrics of complex network based on co-occurrence truth table: exemplified by a high-speed rail network," Journal of Geographical Systems, Springer, vol. 25(4), pages 519-538, October.
    2. Jafino, Bramka Arga, 2021. "An equity-based transport network criticality analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 144(C), pages 204-221.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Tao & Rong, Lili & Yan, Kesheng, 2019. "Vulnerability analysis and critical area identification of public transport system: A case of high-speed rail and air transport coupling system in China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 55-70.
    2. Li, Tao & Rong, Lili, 2020. "A comprehensive method for the robustness assessment of high-speed rail network with operation data: A case in China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 666-681.
    3. Caterina Malandri & Luca Mantecchini & Filippo Paganelli & Maria Nadia Postorino, 2021. "Public Transport Network Vulnerability and Delay Distribution among Travelers," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(16), pages 1-14, August.
    4. Rahimi-Golkhandan, Armin & Garvin, Michael J. & Brown, Bryan L., 2019. "Characterizing and measuring transportation infrastructure diversity through linkages with ecological stability theory," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 128(C), pages 114-130.
    5. Jenelius, Erik & Mattsson, Lars-Göran, 2012. "Road network vulnerability analysis of area-covering disruptions: A grid-based approach with case study," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 46(5), pages 746-760.
    6. Leng Jun-qiang & Yang Long-hai & Wei-yi Liu & Lin Zhao, 2017. "Measuring Road Network Vulnerability with Sensitivity Analysis," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 12(1), pages 1-11, January.
    7. Hu, Xinlei & Huang, Jie & Shi, Feng, 2022. "A robustness assessment with passenger flow data of high-speed rail network in China," Chaos, Solitons & Fractals, Elsevier, vol. 165(P1).
    8. Victor Cantillo & Luis F. Macea & Miguel Jaller, 2019. "Assessing Vulnerability of Transportation Networks for Disaster Response Operations," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 243-273, March.
    9. Cats, Oded & Koppenol, Gert-Jaap & Warnier, Martijn, 2017. "Robustness assessment of link capacity reduction for complex networks: Application for public transport systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 167(C), pages 544-553.
    10. Kashin Sugishita & Yasuo Asakura, 2021. "Vulnerability studies in the fields of transportation and complex networks: a citation network analysis," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 13(1), pages 1-34, March.
    11. Pan, Shouzheng & Yan, Hai & He, Jia & He, Zhengbing, 2021. "Vulnerability and resilience of transportation systems: A recent literature review," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 581(C).
    12. Sohouenou, Philippe Y.R. & Christidis, Panayotis & Christodoulou, Aris & Neves, Luis A.C. & Presti, Davide Lo, 2020. "Using a random road graph model to understand road networks robustness to link failures," International Journal of Critical Infrastructure Protection, Elsevier, vol. 29(C).
    13. Khademi, Navid & Babaei, Mohsen & Schmöcker, Jan-Dirk & Fani, Amirhossein, 2018. "Analysis of incident costs in a vulnerable sparse rail network – Description and Iran case study," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 70(C), pages 9-27.
    14. Suchat Tachaudomdach & Auttawit Upayokin & Nopadon Kronprasert & Kriangkrai Arunotayanun, 2021. "Quantifying Road-Network Robustness toward Flood-Resilient Transportation Systems," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-16, March.
    15. Dong, Shangjia & Gao, Xinyu & Mostafavi, Ali & Gao, Jianxi & Gangwal, Utkarsh, 2023. "Characterizing resilience of flood-disrupted dynamic transportation network through the lens of link reliability and stability," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 232(C).
    16. Jaroslav JANÁČEK & Marek KVET, 2017. "Characteristic Of A Critical Network Arc In A Service System," Transport Problems, Silesian University of Technology, Faculty of Transport, vol. 12(SE), pages 141-146, December.
    17. Federico Rupi & Silvia Bernardi & Guido Rossi & Antonio Danesi, 2015. "The Evaluation of Road Network Vulnerability in Mountainous Areas: A Case Study," Networks and Spatial Economics, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 397-411, June.
    18. Novak, David C. & Sullivan, James L. & Niles, Meredith T., 2021. "Targeted Investment for Food Access," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt9b71p9zg, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    19. Joao Tiago Aparicio & Elisabete Arsenio & Francisco C. Santos & Rui Henriques, 2022. "LINES: muLtImodal traNsportation rEsilience analySis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-20, June.
    20. JANSSENS, Jochen & DE CORTE, Annelies & SÖRENSEN, Kenneth, 2016. "Water distribution network design optimisation with respect to reliability," Working Papers 2016007, University of Antwerp, Faculty of Business and Economics.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Freight transportation; Network robustness; Criticality; NRI;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • R41 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics - - - Transportation: Demand, Supply, and Congestion; Travel Time; Safety and Accidents; Transportation Noise
    • R42 - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics - - Transportation Economics - - - Government and Private Investment Analysis; Road Maintenance; Transportation Planning
    • O18 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Urban, Rural, Regional, and Transportation Analysis; Housing; Infrastructure

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:kap:jgeosy:v:22:y:2020:i:3:d:10.1007_s10109-020-00320-8. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Sonal Shukla or Springer Nature Abstracting and Indexing (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.springer.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.