IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/buseth/v31y2022i1p224-238.html

How hedonic and perceived community benefits from employee CSR involvement drive CSR advocacy behavior to co‐workers

Author

Listed:
  • Rojanasak Chomvilailuk
  • Ken Butcher

Abstract

This study seeks to determine how organizational citizenship behavior (OCB) can be influenced by employee perception of the benefits arising from their involvement with corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities. The work is significant because of growing investment in CSR activities involving employees and increased firm expectations of employee dissemination of CSR information. A unique model examined how two types of perceived benefits, accruing to US‐based employees from their CSR engagement, impacted OCB. The variable of co‐worker‐directed CSR advocacy was used as a unique measure of OCB. An integrative theoretical framework combined social exchange theory with organizational citizenship behavior to provide a more comprehensive understanding of relationships. The first employee benefit tested was hedonic value, while the second was perceived community value. CSR reputation was modeled as a mediating variable. Data were collected via two scenario‐based experiments based at each respondents’ workplace. Analytical techniques included analysis of co‐variance and structural equation modeling using partial least squares. While both types of benefit had a significant effect on co‐worker‐directed CSR advocacy, the pathways differed. Perceived community value had a stronger effect on the mediating variable of CSR reputation, and consequently a significant indirect effect on the dependent variable. In contrast, hedonic value directly affected co‐worker‐directed CSR advocacy with CSR reputation playing no mediating role. This study contributes to the CSR literature through better understanding of the processes leading to the organizational citizenship behavior variable of co‐worker‐directed CSR advocacy. This dependent variable extends previous conceptualizations of OCB.

Suggested Citation

  • Rojanasak Chomvilailuk & Ken Butcher, 2022. "How hedonic and perceived community benefits from employee CSR involvement drive CSR advocacy behavior to co‐workers," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(1), pages 224-238, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:wly:buseth:v:31:y:2022:i:1:p:224-238
    DOI: 10.1111/beer.12404
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1111/beer.12404
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1111/beer.12404?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Michelle Greenwood, 2007. "Stakeholder Engagement: Beyond the Myth of Corporate Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 74(4), pages 315-327, September.
    2. Manuel Branco & Lúcia Rodrigues, 2006. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Resource-Based Perspectives," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 69(2), pages 111-132, December.
    3. Chomvilailuk, Rojanasak & Butcher, Ken, 2016. "Evaluating the effect of corporate social responsibility communication on mobile telephone customers," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 33(C), pages 164-170.
    4. Pablo Rodrigo & Daniel Arenas, 2008. "Do Employees Care About CSR Programs? A Typology of Employees According to their Attitudes," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 83(2), pages 265-283, December.
    5. Glavas, Ante & Kelley, Ken, 2014. "The Effects of Perceived Corporate Social Responsibility on Employee Attitudes," Business Ethics Quarterly, Cambridge University Press, vol. 24(2), pages 165-202, April.
    6. C. Bhattacharya & Daniel Korschun & Sankar Sen, 2009. "Strengthening Stakeholder–Company Relationships Through Mutually Beneficial Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 85(2), pages 257-272, April.
    7. Laura Marie Edinger-Schons & Lars Lengler-Graiff & Sabrina Scheidler & Jan Wieseke, 2019. "Frontline Employees as Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Ambassadors: A Quasi-Field Experiment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 157(2), pages 359-373, June.
    8. Jiyoung Kim & Russell Lacey & Hae-Ryong Kim & Jaebeom Suh, 2019. "How CSR serves as a preventive mechanism for coping with dysfunctional customer behavior," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 13(4), pages 671-694, December.
    9. R. Slack & S. Corlett & R. Morris, 2015. "Exploring Employee Engagement with (Corporate) Social Responsibility: A Social Exchange Perspective on Organisational Participation," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 127(3), pages 537-548, March.
    10. Srinivasan Sekar & Lata Dyaram, 2017. "What drives employees to participate in corporate volunteering programs?," Social Responsibility Journal, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, vol. 13(4), pages 661-677, October.
    11. Kenneth De Roeck & Omer Farooq, 2018. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Ethical Leadership: Investigating Their Interactive Effect on Employees’ Socially Responsible Behaviors," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 151(4), pages 923-939, September.
    12. Hae-Ryong Kim & Moonkyu Lee & Hyoung-Tark Lee & Na-Min Kim, 2010. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Employee–Company Identification," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 95(4), pages 557-569, September.
    13. Owler, Kathryn & Morrison, Rachel & Plester, Barbara, 2010. "Does fun work? The complexity of promoting fun at work," Journal of Management & Organization, Cambridge University Press, vol. 16(3), pages 338-352, July.
    14. Jean-Pascal Gond & Assâad El Akremi & Valérie Swaen & Nishat Babu, 2017. "The psychological microfoundations of corporate social responsibility: A person-centric systematic review," Post-Print halshs-01698534, HAL.
    15. Ainsworth, Jeremy, 2020. "Feelings of ownership and volunteering: Examining psychological ownership as a volunteering motivation for nonprofit service organisations," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 52(C).
    16. Jie Shen & Hongru Zhang, 2019. "Socially Responsible Human Resource Management and Employee Support for External CSR: Roles of Organizational CSR Climate and Perceived CSR Directed Toward Employees," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 156(3), pages 875-888, May.
    17. Teng Teng & Shengliang Zhang & Xiaodong Li & Yuan Chen, 2020. "Customer compliance with employee fuzzy requests in service encounters: a self-determination theory perspective," Service Business, Springer;Pan-Pacific Business Association, vol. 14(2), pages 217-240, June.
    18. Panagopoulos, Nikolaos G. & Rapp, Adam A. & Vlachos, Pavlos A., 2016. "I think they think we are good citizens: Meta-perceptions as antecedents of employees' reactions to corporate social responsibility," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 69(8), pages 2781-2790.
    19. Linda O’Riordan & Jenny Fairbrass, 2014. "Managing CSR Stakeholder Engagement: A New Conceptual Framework," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 125(1), pages 121-145, November.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Priyanka Aggarwal & Reetesh Kumar Singh, 2022. "Synthesizing the affinity between employees' internal‐external CSR perceptions and work outcomes: A meta‐analytic investigation," Business Ethics, the Environment & Responsibility, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 31(4), pages 1053-1101, October.
    2. Seunghee Im & Yang Woon Chung & Ji Yeon Yang, 2016. "Employees’ Participation in Corporate Social Responsibility and Organizational Outcomes: The Moderating Role of Person–CSR Fit," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(1), pages 1-14, December.
    3. Lin, Yi-Ting & Liu, Nien-Chi & Lin, Ji-Wei, 2022. "Firms’ adoption of CSR initiatives and employees’ organizational commitment: Organizational CSR climate and employees’ CSR-induced attributions as mediators," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 626-637.
    4. Heung-Jun Jung & Mohammad Ali, 2017. "Corporate Social Responsibility, Organizational Justice and Positive Employee Attitudes: In the Context of Korean Employment Relations," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(11), pages 1-24, October.
    5. Erifili-Christina Chatzopoulou & Dimitris Manolopoulos & Vasia Agapitou, 2022. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Employee Outcomes: Interrelations of External and Internal Orientations with Job Satisfaction and Organizational Commitment," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 179(3), pages 795-817, September.
    6. Ranya Saeed Alhmoudi & Sanjay Kumar Singh & Francesco Caputo & Teresa Riso & Francesca Iandolo, 2022. "Corporate social responsibility and innovative work behavior: Is it a matter of perceptions?," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(6), pages 2030-2037, November.
    7. Lei Zhou & Feng Wei & Yu Kong, 2022. "Do Employee Stock Ownership Plans Affect Corporate Social Responsibility? Evidence from China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(3), pages 1-19, January.
    8. Sabeen Hussain Bhatti & Kamran Iqbal & Gabriele Santoro & Fabio Rizzato, 2022. "The impact of corporate social responsibility directed toward employees on contextual performance in the banking sector: A serial model of perceived organizational support and affective organizational commitment," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 29(6), pages 1980-1994, November.
    9. Mariam Farooq & Omer Farooq & Walid Cheffi, 2019. "How Do Employees Respond to the CSR Initiatives of their Organizations: Empirical Evidence from Developing Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-14, May.
    10. Xie, Jiangtao & Jain, Tanusree, 2024. "Unpacking micro-CSR through a computational literature review: An identity heterogeneity view of internal stakeholders," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    11. Byung‐Jik Kim & Niels Van Quaquebeke & Youngkyun Chang & Tae‐Hyun Kim, 2025. "When and how corporate social responsibility promotes innovation: A multi‐level moderated mediation model," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(1), pages 1325-1345, January.
    12. Mavis Adu-Gyamfi & Zheng He & Gabriel Nyame & Seth Boahen & Michelle Frempomaa Frempong, 2021. "Effects of Internal CSR Activities on Social Performance: The Employee Perspective," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-28, June.
    13. Atia Alpha Alfa & Raphael Aryee & Franklyn Manu & Israel Kpekpena, 2025. "Scientometric and content analysis‐based review of employees in micro‐level corporate social responsibility research," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(2), pages 1945-1969, March.
    14. Kelsy Hejjas & Graham Miller & Caroline Scarles, 2019. "“It’s Like Hating Puppies!” Employee Disengagement and Corporate Social Responsibility," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 157(2), pages 319-337, June.
    15. Kenneth De Roeck & Omer Farooq, 2018. "Corporate Social Responsibility and Ethical Leadership: Investigating Their Interactive Effect on Employees’ Socially Responsible Behaviors," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 151(4), pages 923-939, September.
    16. Kenneth Roeck & François Maon, 2018. "Building the Theoretical Puzzle of Employees’ Reactions to Corporate Social Responsibility: An Integrative Conceptual Framework and Research Agenda," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 149(3), pages 609-625, May.
    17. Castaldo, Sandro & Ciacci, Andrea & Penco, Lara, 2023. "Perceived corporate social responsibility and job satisfaction in grocery retail: A comparison between low- and high-productivity stores," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 74(C).
    18. Anupriya Singh & Shalini Srivastava & Khalid Mehmood & Richa Misra, 2025. "Inclusive Leadership Unveiled: Driving CSR and Innovation Through a Moderated Mediation Framework," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 32(6), pages 7454-7466, November.
    19. Francesco Gangi & Eugenio D'Angelo & Lucia Michela Daniele & Nicola Varrone, 2021. "Assessing the impact of socially responsible human resources management on company environmental performance and cost of debt," Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(5), pages 1511-1527, September.
    20. David A. Jones & Alexander Newman & Ruodan Shao & Fang Lee Cooke, 2019. "Advances in Employee-Focused Micro-Level Research on Corporate Social Responsibility: Situating New Contributions Within the Current State of the Literature," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 157(2), pages 293-302, June.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:buseth:v:31:y:2022:i:1:p:224-238. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/journal/26946424 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.