IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/wly/ajagec/v108y2026i2p429-442.html

De gustibus est disputandum: The role of agricultural and applied economists in an era of behavior change initiatives and endogenous preferences

Author

Listed:
  • Brian E. Roe

Abstract

Popular society increasingly questions preferences that drive many resource allocations and production decisions, with many groups actively seeking to alter those preferences to achieve changes to resource use. Agricultural and applied economists, who are already equipped with excellent technical skills to undertake consumer preference and valuation studies, must also be challenged to understand post‐Beckerian consumer theories that can help guide emerging requests placed upon economists as multi‐disciplinary collaborators as non‐academic groups press us to join in work involving interventions that work from the implicit assumption that preferences are malleable and potentially endogenous. I call association members to follow our best traditions of studying production dynamics and incorporating emerging theories drawn from or inspired by other disciplines so that we may better interact with the broader scientific community who, as many suggest, finds our insistence on stable and static preferences to limit the usefulness of economists in handling a raft of modern dilemmas. In addition to setting out the history of economists' reticence in considering endogenous preferences, I will outline several threads of emerging literature that can provide structure to professional inquiry in this domain and sketch some emergent cases with implications for the agricultural and resource sectors.

Suggested Citation

  • Brian E. Roe, 2026. "De gustibus est disputandum: The role of agricultural and applied economists in an era of behavior change initiatives and endogenous preferences," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 108(2), pages 429-442, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:wly:ajagec:v:108:y:2026:i:2:p:429-442
    DOI: 10.1002/ajae.70049
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.1002/ajae.70049
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1002/ajae.70049?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Emeline Bezin, 2019. "The economics of Green consumption, cultural transmission and sustainable technological change," PSE-Ecole d'économie de Paris (Postprint) halshs-02087970, HAL.
    2. Emeline Bezin, 2019. "The economics of Green consumption, cultural transmission and sustainable technological change," Post-Print halshs-02087970, HAL.
    3. Gretchen Chapman & Uri Gneezy, 2024. "Change Behavior, Motivation Will Follow(?): Acquired Taste and Incentives," AEA Papers and Proceedings, American Economic Association, vol. 114, pages 660-665, May.
    4. Samuel Bowles, 1998. "Endogenous Preferences: The Cultural Consequences of Markets and Other Economic Institutions," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 36(1), pages 75-111, March.
    5. Ulph, Alistair & Ulph, David, 2021. "Environmental policy when consumers value conformity," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 109(C).
    6. David Cesarini & Christopher T. Dawes & Magnus Johannesson & Paul Lichtenstein & Björn Wallace, 2009. "Genetic Variation in Preferences for Giving and Risk Taking," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 124(2), pages 809-842.
    7. Shane Frederick & George Loewenstein & Ted O'Donoghue, 2002. "Time Discounting and Time Preference: A Critical Review," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 40(2), pages 351-401, June.
    8. Steven Callander & Juan Carlos Carbajal, 2022. "Cause and Effect in Political Polarization: A Dynamic Analysis," Journal of Political Economy, University of Chicago Press, vol. 130(4), pages 825-880.
    9. Bezin, Emeline, 2019. "The economics of green consumption, cultural transmission and sustainable technological change," Journal of Economic Theory, Elsevier, vol. 181(C), pages 497-546.
    10. Madhu Khanna, 2022. "Breakthroughs at the disciplinary nexus: Rewards and challenges for applied economists," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 104(2), pages 475-492, March.
    11. B. Douglas Bernheim & Antonio Rangel, 2009. "Beyond Revealed Preference: Choice-Theoretic Foundations for Behavioral Welfare Economics," The Quarterly Journal of Economics, President and Fellows of Harvard College, vol. 124(1), pages 51-104.
    12. Bidisha Mandal & Brian E. Roe, 2014. "Risk Tolerance among National Longitudinal Survey of Youth Participants: The Effects of Age and Cognitive Skills," Economica, London School of Economics and Political Science, vol. 81(323), pages 522-543, July.
    13. Konc, Théo & Savin, Ivan & van den Bergh, Jeroen C.J.M., 2021. "The social multiplier of environmental policy: Application to carbon taxation," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    14. Oren Bar‐Gill & Chaim Fershtman, 2005. "Public Policy with Endogenous Preferences," Journal of Public Economic Theory, Association for Public Economic Theory, vol. 7(5), pages 841-857, December.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mattauch, Linus & Hepburn, Cameron & Spuler, Fiona & Stern, Nicholas, 2022. "The economics of climate change with endogenous preferences," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    2. Massimiliano Carlo Pietro Rizzati & Emanuele Ciola & Enrico Turco & Davide Bazzana & Sergio Vergalli, 2025. "Beyond Green Preferences: Demand-side and Supply-side Drivers in the Low-Carbon Transition," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 88(5), pages 1239-1295, May.
    3. Bezin, Emeline & Ponthière, Gregory, 2019. "The tragedy of the commons and socialization: Theory and policy," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    4. Daniel Torren-Peraire & Jeroen C. J. M. van den Bergh & Ivan Savin, 2025. "The Cultural Multiplier of Climate Policy," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 88(11), pages 3215-3251, November.
    5. Gatti, Donatella & Lo, Gaye-Del & Serranito, Francisco, 2026. "Unpacking the green box: Endogenous preferences and environmental policy stringency in European Countries," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 240(C).
    6. Liwen Chen & Bobby Chung & Guanghua Wang, 2022. "Stay-at-Home Peer Mothers and Gender Norms: Short-run Effects on Educational Outcomes," Working Papers 2022-039, Human Capital and Economic Opportunity Working Group.
    7. Chen, Liwen & Chung, Bobby W. & Wang, Guanghua, 2025. "Composition of peer mothers and gender norms: Class randomization and short-run effects," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    8. Jinyan Peng & Kai Li & Yingpeng Gao, 2022. "How the Internet Affects China’s Green Consumption Development: Empirical Research Based on Baidu Index Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(1), pages 1-16, December.
    9. Fenske, James & Gupta, Bishnupriya & Mukhopadhyay, Anwesh, 2025. "Colonial Persistence," CAGE Online Working Paper Series 752, Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy (CAGE).
    10. Jacobs Martin, 2016. "Accounting for Changing Tastes: Approaches to Explaining Unstable Individual Preferences," Review of Economics, De Gruyter, vol. 67(2), pages 121-183, August.
    11. Giorgio Fabbri & Paolo Melindi-Ghidi, 2025. "Culture, Supply Chain and Sustainable Food Consumption," Working Papers hal-05045857, HAL.
    12. Jiang, Gaoyang & Peng, Jie & Liang, Xintong & Pan, Junyu, 2025. "Supply chain digitization and continuous green innovation: Evidence from China," Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 142(C).
    13. Arno Riedl, 2009. "Behavioral and Experimental Economics Can Inform Public Policy: Some Thoughts," CESifo Working Paper Series 2902, CESifo.
    14. Wang, Li & Wang, Qing & Zhang, Yufei & Hori, Nobuaki, 2025. "Two kinds of centralization: Divergences between China and Europe," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 153(C).
    15. Mattauch, Linus & Hepburn, Cameron, 2016. "Climate policy when preferences are endogenous – and sometimes they are," INET Oxford Working Papers 2016-04, Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford.
    16. Ambec, Stefan & De Donder, Philippe, 2022. "Environmental policy with green consumerism," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 111(C).
    17. Landini, Fabio & Lunardon, Davide & Marzucchi, Alberto, 2025. "Green Jobs and Meaningful Work," GLO Discussion Paper Series 1639, Global Labor Organization (GLO).
    18. Lorenz Dögnitz & Théo Konc & Linus Mattauch, 2024. "The Political Economics of Green Transitions: Optimal Intertemporal Policy Response," Berlin School of Economics Discussion Papers 0047, Berlin School of Economics.
    19. Eugénie Joltreau, 2022. "Extended Producer Responsibility, Packaging Waste Reduction and Eco-design," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 83(3), pages 527-578, November.
    20. Donatella Gatti & Julien Vauday, 2024. "AI Diffusion, Disasters, Environmental and Social Change," Working Papers hal-04604374, HAL.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wly:ajagec:v:108:y:2026:i:2:p:429-442. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Wiley Content Delivery (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://doi.org/10.1111/(ISSN)1467-8276 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.