IDEAS home Printed from
   My bibliography  Save this article

Strukturen und Bedingungen für die akademische Forschung in der EU und in Österreich. Ergebnisse einer repräsentativen Befragung


  • Jürgen Janger
  • Agnes Kügler
  • Anna Strauss



Die Ergebnisse einer repräsentativen Umfrage unter Forschenden in Hochschuleinrichtungen der EU zeigen die Heterogenität der nationalen Hochschulsysteme auf. Die wahrgenommenen Unterschiede etwa hinsichtlich Doktoratsstudien, Karrierestrukturen und Arbeitsbedingungen können in einem integrierten Forschungsraum asymmetrische Mobilität und Divergenzen in der Forschungsleistung zur Folge haben. In Österreich sind Forschende mit den Arbeitsbedingungen überdurchschnittlich zufrieden, mit Ausnahme der Karriereperspektiven. Auch die Umfrageergebnisse zu Doktoratsstudien deuten auf Verbesserungspotential hin.

Suggested Citation

  • Jürgen Janger & Agnes Kügler & Anna Strauss, 2018. "Strukturen und Bedingungen für die akademische Forschung in der EU und in Österreich. Ergebnisse einer repräsentativen Befragung," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 91(8), pages 585-597, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:wfo:monber:y:2018:i:8:p:585-597
    Note: With English abstract.

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL:
    File Function: Abstract
    Download Restriction: Payment required

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    1. repec:wfo:wstudy:60983 is not listed on IDEAS
    2. Reinhilde Veugelers, 2017. "The challenge of China’s rise as a science and technology powerhouse," Policy Contributions 21154, Bruegel.
    3. Rosalind S Hunter, 2009. "The Elite Brain Drain," Working Papers id:2048, eSocialSciences.
    4. RosalindS. Hunter & Andrew J. Oswald & Bruce G. Charlton, 2009. "The Elite Brain Drain," Economic Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 119(538), pages 231-251, June.
    5. Chiara Franzoni & Giuseppe Scellato & Paula Stephan, 2012. "Foreign Born Scientists: Mobility Patterns for Sixteen Countries," NBER Working Papers 18067, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
    6. Janger, Jürgen & Nowotny, Klaus, 2016. "Job choice in academia," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 45(8), pages 1672-1683.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)


    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:wfo:monber:y:2018:i:8:p:585-597. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Ilse Schulz). General contact details of provider: .

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service hosted by the Research Division of the Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis . RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.