IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/poicbe/v14y2020i1p847-858n81.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Lean and Agile model implementation for managing the supply chain

Author

Listed:
  • Hassani Youssef

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies,Bucharest, Romania)

  • Ceauşu Ioana

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies,Bucharest, Romania)

  • Iordache Adrian

    (Bucharest University of Economic Studies,Bucharest, Romania)

Abstract

Even though both researchers and practitioners propose several approaches to supply chain management research and the scientific literature shows that several methods have been implemented for supply chain management, the studies carried out have not revealed a formalized process or a clear method for supply chain integration. Indeed, there is a specific way to achieve this integration in the supply chain and there are differences in how one company does it compared to another. More recently, an alternative based on the Lean and Agile paradigms has been presented. The implementation of the Lean and Agile models to the supply chain aims to improve and simplify the production and the process of minimizing or eliminating wastes of all kinds, raise the productivity of the supply chain, increase the capability to respond quickly to unpredictable and changing customer demands and to take advantage of the uncertainty and the volatility of the market in the medium term. The main objective of this paper is to conduct an impact study on the implementation of Lean and Agile models in the supply chain, based on a review of the scientific literature concerning the models implemented to improve the productivity of the supply chain. We aim to identify and analyze the research carried out regarding the implementation of Lean and Agile models in order to improve the supply chain management, the results achieved and future research directions. Although the Lean and Agility paradigms are distinct and can be developed differently, they can be successfully integrated into a well-designed supply chain integration that involves a substantial degree of ambiguity in terms of significance and level of application across different supply chains, in order to increase the capacity to act, react and adapt to changes in demand and supply.

Suggested Citation

  • Hassani Youssef & Ceauşu Ioana & Iordache Adrian, 2020. "Lean and Agile model implementation for managing the supply chain," Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, Sciendo, vol. 14(1), pages 847-858, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:14:y:2020:i:1:p:847-858:n:81
    DOI: 10.2478/picbe-2020-0081
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2020-0081
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/picbe-2020-0081?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Kisperska-Moron, Danuta & Swierczek, Artur, 2009. "The agile capabilities of Polish companies in the supply chain: An empirical study," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 118(1), pages 217-224, March.
    2. Sun, X.Y. & Ji, P. & Sun, L.Y. & Wang, Y.L., 2008. "Positioning multiple decoupling points in a supply network," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(2), pages 943-956, June.
    3. Ben Naylor, J. & Naim, Mohamed M & Berry, Danny, 1999. "Leagility: Integrating the lean and agile manufacturing paradigms in the total supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 62(1-2), pages 107-118, May.
    4. Lin, Ching-Torng & Chiu, Hero & Chu, Po-Young, 2006. "Agility index in the supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 100(2), pages 285-299, April.
    5. Tortorella, Guilherme Luz & Miorando, Rogério & Marodin, Giuliano, 2017. "Lean supply chain management: Empirical research on practices, contexts and performance," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 193(C), pages 98-112.
    6. Katrin Marquardt & Marieta Olaru & Ioana Ceausu, 2017. "Study on the Development of Quality Measurements Models for Steering Business Services in Relation to Customer Satisfaction," The AMFITEATRU ECONOMIC journal, Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania, vol. 19(44), pages 1-95, February.
    7. Olhager, Jan, 2003. "Strategic positioning of the order penetration point," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(3), pages 319-329, September.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Iman Ghalehkhondabi & Dusan Sormaz & Gary Weckman, 2016. "Multiple customer order decoupling points within a hybrid MTS/MTO manufacturing supply chain with uncertain demands in two consecutive echelons," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 53(4), pages 976-997, December.
    2. Cannas, Violetta G. & Gosling, Jonathan & Pero, Margherita & Rossi, Tommaso, 2020. "Determinants for order-fulfilment strategies in engineer-to-order companies: Insights from the machinery industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    3. Vikash Sharma & Rakesh D. Raut & Sachin Kumar Mangla & Balkrishna E. Narkhede & Sunil Luthra & Ravindra Gokhale, 2021. "A systematic literature review to integrate lean, agile, resilient, green and sustainable paradigms in the supply chain management," Business Strategy and the Environment, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 30(2), pages 1191-1212, February.
    4. Cannas, Violetta G. & Gosling, Jonathan & Pero, Margherita & Rossi, Tommaso, 2019. "Engineering and production decoupling configurations: An empirical study in the machinery industry," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 216(C), pages 173-189.
    5. Jeong, In-Jae, 2011. "A dynamic model for the optimization of decoupling point and production planning in a supply chain," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 131(2), pages 561-567, June.
    6. Schoenwitz, Manuel & Potter, Andrew & Gosling, Jonathan & Naim, Mohamed, 2017. "Product, process and customer preference alignment in prefabricated house building," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 183(PA), pages 79-90.
    7. Hoogstra-Klein, Marjanke A. & Meijboom, Kars, 2021. "A qualitative exploration of the wood product supply chain – investigating the possibilities and desirability of an increased demand orientation," Forest Policy and Economics, Elsevier, vol. 133(C).
    8. Azevedo, Susana G. & Govindan, Kannan & Carvalho, Helena & Cruz-Machado, V., 2012. "An integrated model to assess the leanness and agility of the automotive industry," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 85-94.
    9. Wikner, Joakim & Naim, Mohamed M. & Spiegler, Virginia L.M. & Lin, Junyi, 2017. "IOBPCS based models and decoupling thinking," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 194(C), pages 153-166.
    10. Pinho, Celso R.A. & Pinho, Maria Luiza C.A. & Deligonul, Seyda Z. & Tamer Cavusgil, S., 2022. "The agility construct in the literature: Conceptualization and bibliometric assessment," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 517-532.
    11. Demeter, Krisztina & Golini, Ruggero, 2014. "Inventory configurations and drivers: An international study of assembling industries," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 157(C), pages 62-73.
    12. Hoppenheit, Steffi & Günthner, Willibald A., 2015. "Identifying Main Drivers on Inventory using Regression Analysis," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Blecker, Thorsten & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Operational Excellence in Logistics and Supply Chains: Optimization Methods, Data-driven Approaches and Security Insights. Proceedings of the Hamburg , volume 22, pages 141-169, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    13. Bottani, Eleonora, 2009. "A fuzzy QFD approach to achieve agility," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 119(2), pages 380-391, June.
    14. Nikolaus Kangas & Hanna Kropsu-Vehkapera & Harri Haapasalo & Tuomo Kinnunen, 2013. "Empirical Aspects on Defining Product Data for Rapid Productisation," International Journal of Synergy and Research, ToKnowPress, vol. 2(2), pages 109-130.
    15. Agarwal, Ashish & Shankar, Ravi & Tiwari, M.K., 2006. "Modeling the metrics of lean, agile and leagile supply chain: An ANP-based approach," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 173(1), pages 211-225, August.
    16. Dirk Pieter van Donk & Ron van Doorne, 2016. "The impact of the customer order decoupling point on type and level of supply chain integration," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 54(9), pages 2572-2584, May.
    17. Xiang Ning Zhu & Gabrielle Peko & David Sundaram & Selwyn Piramuthu, 2022. "Blockchain-Based Agile Supply Chain Framework with IoT," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 24(2), pages 563-578, April.
    18. repec:tkp:ijsrsy:v:2:y:2012:i:2:p:109-130 is not listed on IDEAS
    19. Gosling, Jonathan & Naim, Mohamed M., 2009. "Engineer-to-order supply chain management: A literature review and research agenda," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 122(2), pages 741-754, December.
    20. Romsdal, Anita & Strandhagen, Jan Ola & Dreyer, Heidi Carin, 2014. "Can Differentiated Production Planning and Control enable both Responsiveness and Efficiency in Food Production?," International Journal on Food System Dynamics, International Center for Management, Communication, and Research, vol. 5(1), pages 1-10, August.
    21. Abbas Abbaspour & Alireza Golabdoust & Naeimeh Golabdoost & Tayebeh Golabdoust, 2015. "A Study on the Relationship between Organizational Intelligence and Organization Agility in Tehran University of Medical Sciences," International Journal of Asian Social Science, Asian Economic and Social Society, vol. 5(11), pages 626-640, November.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:poicbe:v:14:y:2020:i:1:p:847-858:n:81. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.