IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/mtrbid/v44y2022i3p263-273n9.html

The Impact of Environmental Taxes on Mitigation of Pollution in Agriculture: The Theoretical Approach

Author

Listed:
  • Miceikienė Astrida

    (Prof., Vytautas Magnus University, Lithuania)

  • Walczak Damian

    (Prof., Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń, Poland)

  • Misevičiūtė Ieva

    (Mg., Vytautas Magnus University, Lithuania)

Abstract

The research problem is based on the increasing global environmental pollution, reduction of the natural potential of countries, and the importance of exploration of effective measures for the solution of these issues. The research analyzes the impact of environmental taxes as an environmental policy instrument helping reduce environmental pollution and increase the natural potential of agriculture. Environmental taxes are one of the most important tools for the reduction of GHG emissions in the EU. The research aim is to theoretically substantiate the role and impact of environmental taxes on the mitigation of pollution in agriculture. Research results present that environmental taxes have generic and specific goals and are related to the conventional tax functions: fiscal, regulatory, and redistributory. The identified strengths, weaknesses, applicability, and limitations of the environmental taxes enabled the identification of the prospects of these taxes in terms of pollution mitigation. The classification schemes of the environmental taxes were prepared with the environmental taxes grouped by various attributes. Moreover, the environmental tax objects were identified and substantiated, in particular, those in agriculture. The possibilities and limitations of application of the environmental taxes to agriculture in the context of the implementation of the European Green Deal were described. The following theoretical methods were used in order to substantiate the problem’s relevance: scientific literature analysis, comparative analysis, systemic analysis, document analysis, generalization analysis, and other common research methods. The bibliometric method was used in the analysis of the relations between environmental taxes goals and functions from the theoretical perspective.

Suggested Citation

  • Miceikienė Astrida & Walczak Damian & Misevičiūtė Ieva, 2022. "The Impact of Environmental Taxes on Mitigation of Pollution in Agriculture: The Theoretical Approach," Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure Development, Sciendo, vol. 44(3), pages 263-273, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:vrs:mtrbid:v:44:y:2022:i:3:p:263-273:n:9
    DOI: 10.15544/mts.2022.27
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.15544/mts.2022.27
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15544/mts.2022.27?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Hassan, Mahmoud & Oueslati, Walid & Rousselière, Damien, 2020. "Environmental taxes, reforms and economic growth: an empirical analysis of panel data," Economic Systems, Elsevier, vol. 44(3).
    2. Doğan, Buhari & Chu, Lan Khanh & Ghosh, Sudeshna & Diep Truong, Huong Hoang & Balsalobre-Lorente, Daniel, 2022. "How environmental taxes and carbon emissions are related in the G7 economies?," Renewable Energy, Elsevier, vol. 187(C), pages 645-656.
    3. Athanasios Balafoutis & Bert Beck & Spyros Fountas & Jurgen Vangeyte & Tamme Van der Wal & Iria Soto & Manuel Gómez-Barbero & Andrew Barnes & Vera Eory, 2017. "Precision Agriculture Technologies Positively Contributing to GHG Emissions Mitigation, Farm Productivity and Economics," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 9(8), pages 1-28, July.
    4. Delgado, Francisco J. & Freire-González, Jaume & Presno, Maria J., 2022. "Environmental taxation in the European Union: Are there common trends?," EconStor Open Access Articles and Book Chapters, ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics, vol. 73, pages 670-682.
    5. Glazyrina, Irina & Glazyrin, Vasiliy & Vinnichenko, Sergey, 2006. "The polluter pays principle and potential conflicts in society," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(3), pages 324-330, September.
    6. Miller, Steven, "undated". "Tax Policies, Agriculture and the Environment," Staff Paper Series 211085, Michigan State University, Department of Agricultural, Food, and Resource Economics.
    7. Lambert, David K. & Gong, Jian, 2010. "Dynamic Adjustment of U.S. Agriculture to Energy Price Changes," Journal of Agricultural and Applied Economics, Cambridge University Press, vol. 42(2), pages 289-301, May.
    8. Gren, Ing-Marie & Höglind, Lisa & Jansson, Torbjörn, 2021. "Refunding of a climate tax on food consumption in Sweden," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C).
    9. Mackenzie, S.G. & Wallace, M. & Kyriazakis, I., 2017. "How effective can environmental taxes be in reducing the environmental impact of pig farming systems?," Agricultural Systems, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 131-144.
    10. Dieter Schmidtchen & Jenny Helstroffer & Christian Koboldt, 2021. "Regulatory failure and the polluter pays principle: why regulatory impact assessment dominates the polluter pays principle," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 23(1), pages 109-144, January.
    11. Bosquet, Benoit, 2000. "Environmental tax reform: does it work? A survey of the empirical evidence," Ecological Economics, Elsevier, vol. 34(1), pages 19-32, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ana Clara Borrego & Rute Abreu & Francisco Alegria Carreira & Filipe Caetano & Ana Lúcia Vasconcelos, 2023. "Environmental Taxation on the Agri-Food Sector and the Farm to Fork Strategy: The Portuguese Case," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(16), pages 1-18, August.
    2. İbrahim Özmen & Mihai Mutascu, 2025. "Don’t look earth: environmental taxes effect on Co2 emissions, evidence from moments quantile regression for EU countries," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(2), pages 4619-4658, February.
    3. Wang, Qin & Wang, Ying, 2025. "What shapes export competitiveness of home country firms? Host country environmental regulations or labor standards," International Review of Financial Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 103(C).
    4. Tii N. Nchofoung & Hervé Kaffo Fotio & Clovis Wendji Miamo, 2023. "Green taxation and renewable energy technologies adoption: A global evidence," Working Papers 23/007, European Xtramile Centre of African Studies (EXCAS).
    5. Shao, Yunshu & Cheng, Yuxiang, 2025. "Impact of Chinese environmental protection tax law on high-pollution firms' employment growth - A quasi natural experiment," Economic Analysis and Policy, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 416-437.
    6. Burcu Ozcan & Serkan Eryilmaz & Feyyaz Zeren, 2026. "Determinants of sustainable development goals in Sub-Saharan Africa: the roles of foreign direct investment inflows, environmental taxes, and natural resource rents," Economic Change and Restructuring, Springer, vol. 59(2), pages 1-34, April.
    7. Yang, Zhijiu & You, Fengyi & Qin, Yanfang & Wu, Ge, 2025. "Environmental taxes, political connections, and firm financialization: Evidence from China's environmental tax reform," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    8. Llop Maria, 2023. "Environmental Taxation and International Trade in a Tax-Distorted Economy," Economics - The Open-Access, Open-Assessment Journal, De Gruyter, vol. 17(1), pages 1-12, January.
    9. Ihor Nazarkevych & Olga Sych, 2023. "Taxation as a tool of implementation of the EU Green Deal in Ukraine," Regional Science Policy & Practice, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 15(1), pages 144-160, February.
    10. Wei Tao & Jian-ya Zhou, 2024. "A study on the "Porter Hypothesis" effect of the regulatory measures of the environmental protection tax law in the post-pandemic era," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 19(5), pages 1-20, May.
    11. Guo, Da & Wang, Yuning & Liu, Shuang & Chen, Longyu & Zhao, Chunzi, 2025. "Environmental tax policy, green investment, and high-quality economic development," Finance Research Letters, Elsevier, vol. 86(PF).
    12. Marco Ammoniaci & Simon-Paolo Kartsiotis & Rita Perria & Paolo Storchi, 2021. "State of the Art of Monitoring Technologies and Data Processing for Precision Viticulture," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 11(3), pages 1-20, February.
    13. Jiali Qian & Yinxiang Zhou, 2026. "Environmental Regulation and Green Technology Innovation: An Evolutionary Game Analysis Between Government and High Energy Consuming Enterprises," Computational Economics, Springer;Society for Computational Economics, vol. 67(2), pages 1259-1289, February.
    14. Giovanni Carnazza & Thomas I. Renström & Luca Spataro, 2023. "Is public debt environmentally friendly? The role of EU fiscal rules on environmental quality: An empirical assessment," Working Papers 2023.26, Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei.
    15. repec:ers:journl:v:xxiv:y:2021:i:2b:p:724-742 is not listed on IDEAS
    16. Seyed Davood Hajimirrahimi & Rando Värnik & Elham Eftekhari & Dacinia Crina Petrescu & Ruxandra Malina Petrescu-Mag & Maryam Pour & Hossein Azadi, 2025. "Towards the institutionalization of ethics: agricultural experts’ knowledge of planning effective management of passive defense in Iran," Environment, Development and Sustainability: A Multidisciplinary Approach to the Theory and Practice of Sustainable Development, Springer, vol. 27(10), pages 25525-25557, October.
    17. Takesi Murota & Irina Glazyrina, 2010. "Common-pool resources in East Russia: a case study on the creation of a new national park as a form of community-based natural resource governance," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 11(1), pages 37-52, February.
    18. Thomas M. Koutsos & Georgios C. Menexes & Andreas P. Mamolos, 2021. "The Use of Crop Yield Autocorrelation Data as a Sustainable Approach to Adjust Agronomic Inputs," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-17, February.
    19. Yang, Zeshi & Fang, Ying & Peng, Nianjiao, 2024. "Financial development and natural resource efficiency: Unlocking green growth potential," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).
    20. Teresa Famulska & Jan Kaczmarzyk & Małgorzata Grząba-Włoszek, 2022. "Environmental Taxes in the Member States of the European Union—Trends in Energy Taxes," Energies, MDPI, vol. 15(22), pages 1-20, November.
    21. Luo, Heng & Sun, Ying & Tao, Xiaosha & Tan, Wenwu & Kamarudin, Fakarudin, 2024. "Effects of global value chains on energy efficiency in G20 countries," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 313(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    JEL classification:

    • Q14 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Agriculture - - - Agricultural Finance
    • Q58 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - Environmental Economics - - - Environmental Economics: Government Policy

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:mtrbid:v:44:y:2022:i:3:p:263-273:n:9. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.