IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/ekonom/v95y2016i3p28-36n2.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Does the Global Competitiveness Index Demonstrate the Resilience of Countries to Economic Crises?

Author

Listed:
  • Petrylė Vaiva

    (Faculty of Economics, Vilnius University, Saulėtekio al. 9-II , LT-10222, Vilnius, Lithuania)

Abstract

The concept of a country’s competitiveness still does not have a clear and straightforward meaning and remains ambiguous. Different economists stress various aspects of the concept and use a number of different methods to evaluate how competitive a country is. This paper focuses on the Global Competitiveness Index, which is calculated by the World Economic Forum and is one of the most well-known measures of competitiveness. The World Economic Forum (2015) defines the competitiveness of a country as a “set of institutions, policies and factors that determine the level of productivity of a country” and argues that productivity “is the main long-run engine for growth, living standards and prosperity”. The definition suggests that a higher competitiveness ranking shows higher productivity of the country’s economy, which should lead to higher and more sustainable economic growth. In addition, economic growth leads to higher living standards and prosperity of the country’s citizens. In the light of the definition, the paper forms the hypothesis that if a country is ranked to be more competitive (i.e., its Global Competitiveness Index is higher), it should have greater resilience to an economic crisis than less competitive countries. In other words, more competitive countries should have higher and more sustainable economic growth rates than the less competitive countries. In order to check this hypothesis, the paper uses the graphical analysis method and examines the relationship between the Global Competitiveness Index and the economic growth of countries during the period of 2006-2015. The research findings show that there is a weak or no relationship between the Global Competitiveness Index and the GDP growth of countries; however, it is a negative relationship between the Global Competitiveness Index and the standard deviation of the country’s GDP growth. The results argue that the Global Competitiveness Index is not capable of forecasting the future GDP growth rates of a country; however, the Global Competitiveness Index indicates if the country avoids sharp fluctuations in its GDP growth rates and maintains sustainable economic growth throughout the period.

Suggested Citation

  • Petrylė Vaiva, 2016. "Does the Global Competitiveness Index Demonstrate the Resilience of Countries to Economic Crises?," Ekonomika (Economics), Sciendo, vol. 95(3), pages 28-36, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:ekonom:v:95:y:2016:i:3:p:28-36:n:2
    DOI: 10.15388/ekon.2016.3.10326
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.15388/ekon.2016.3.10326
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.15388/ekon.2016.3.10326?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Clifford Zinnes & Yair Eilat & Jeffrey Sachs, 2001. "Benchmarking competitiveness in transition economies," The Economics of Transition, The European Bank for Reconstruction and Development, vol. 9(2), pages 315-353, July.
    2. Cyrielle Gaglio, 2015. "Measuring Country Competitiveness: A Survey of Exporting-based Indexes," GREDEG Working Papers 2015-42, Groupe de REcherche en Droit, Economie, Gestion (GREDEG CNRS), Université Côte d'Azur, France.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Razek, Noha H.A. & McQuinn, Brian, 2021. "Saudi Arabia's currency misalignment and international competitiveness, accounting for geopolitical risks and the super-contango oil market," Resources Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Eilat, Yair & Zinnes, Clifford, 2002. "The Shadow Economy in Transition Countries: Friend or Foe? A Policy Perspective," World Development, Elsevier, vol. 30(7), pages 1233-1254, July.
    2. Slavo Radosevic, 2003. "The emerging industrial architecture of the wider Europe: The co-evolution of industrial and political structures," UCL SSEES Economics and Business working paper series 29, UCL School of Slavonic and East European Studies (SSEES).
    3. Slavo Radosevic, 2004. "A Two‐Tier or Multi‐Tier Europe? Assessing the Innovation Capacities of Central and East European Countries in the Enlarged EU," Journal of Common Market Studies, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 42(3), pages 641-666, September.
    4. Manuel Carlos Nogueira & Mara Madaleno, 2021. "Are International Indices Good Predictors of Economic Growth? Panel Data and Cluster Analysis for European Union Countries," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(11), pages 1-24, May.
    5. Yelena Kalyuzhnova & Michael Kaser, 2006. "Prudential Management of Hydrocarbon Revenues in Resource-rich Transition Economies," Post-Communist Economies, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 18(2), pages 167-187.
    6. Danijela Despotovic & Slobodan Cvetanovic & Vladimir Nedic & Milan Despotovic, 2019. "Social Aspects of Sustainable Competitiveness in the Selected European Countries in the Period 2012–2015," Social Indicators Research: An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, Springer, vol. 141(2), pages 841-860, January.
    7. Vladimír Benáček, 2003. "Historical perspectives of growth, integration and policies for catching-up in transition countries," Prague Economic Papers, Prague University of Economics and Business, vol. 2003(1), pages 3-17.
    8. repec:lic:licosd:33413 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Zalewski, Romuald I. & Skawinska, Eulalia, 2002. "Determinants of Quality Management Efficiency in Polish Food Processing Industry," 2002 International Congress, August 28-31, 2002, Zaragoza, Spain 24891, European Association of Agricultural Economists.
    10. Diagne, Youssoupha S & Fall, Alsim, 2007. "Impact des infrastructures publiques sur la productivité des entreprises au Sénégal [Impact of public infrastructures on firms productivity in Senegal]," MPRA Paper 54809, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    11. Adamkiewicz Hanna G., 2019. "The dimensions of national competitiveness: The empirical analysis based on The World Economic Forum’s data," Economics and Business Review, Sciendo, vol. 5(3), pages 92-117, September.
    12. Pawlak, Karolina & Poczta, Walenty, 2008. "Pozycja Konkurencyjna Polskiego Sektora Rolno-Spożywczego Na Jednolitym Rynku Europejskim," Village and Agriculture (Wieś i Rolnictwo), Polish Academy of Sciences (IRWiR PAN), Institute of Rural and Agricultural Development, vol. 4(141).
    13. Benáček, Vladimír & Gács, János, 2002. "Catching Up and EU Accession - Conditions for Fast Real Convergence in the Candidate Countries," MPRA Paper 60028, University Library of Munich, Germany.
    14. Montejano García, Salomón & Campos García, Rocio Montserrat & García Ramírez, Ricardo, 2017. "Ventajas competitivas en empresas manufactureras, resultado de los sistemas de producción y la innovación," Small Business International Review, Asociación Española de Contabilidad y Administración de Empresas - AECA, vol. 1(1), pages 53-70, July.
    15. Román, Zoltán, 2002. "A kutatás-fejlesztés teljesítményértékelése [Evaluating the performance of research and development]," Közgazdasági Szemle (Economic Review - monthly of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences), Közgazdasági Szemle Alapítvány (Economic Review Foundation), vol. 0(4), pages 334-347.
    16. Richard Kasa, 2012. "Measuring Innovation Potential at SME Level with a Neurofuzzy Hybrid Model," JOURNAL STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABES-BOLYAI NEGOTIA, Babes-Bolyai University, Faculty of Business.
    17. repec:lic:licosd:20208 is not listed on IDEAS
    18. Jolanta Droždz & Arūnas Burinskas & Viktorija Cohen, 2023. "The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on the Revealed Comparative Advantage of Industries in the Baltic States," Economies, MDPI, vol. 11(2), pages 1-16, February.
    19. Margit Schratzenstaller-Altzinger, 2003. "Zur Steuerreform 2005," WIFO Monatsberichte (monthly reports), WIFO, vol. 76(12), pages 879-900, December.
    20. Marcin Piatkowski, 2002. "The 'New Economy' and Economic Growth in Transition Economies: The Relevance of Institutional Infrastructure," WIDER Working Paper Series DP2002-62, World Institute for Development Economic Research (UNU-WIDER).
    21. Jože P. Damijan & Matija Rojec & Maja Ferjančič, 2011. "The Growing Export Performance of Transition Economies: EU Market Access versus Supply Capacity Factors," Panoeconomicus, Savez ekonomista Vojvodine, Novi Sad, Serbia, vol. 58(4), pages 489-509, December.
    22. H Ingham & M Ingham, 2003. "State transitions in Polish agriculture," Working Papers 541970, Lancaster University Management School, Economics Department.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:ekonom:v:95:y:2016:i:3:p:28-36:n:2. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.