IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/vrs/ecocul/v16y2019i1p32-39n4.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Linear Model for Brand Portfolio Optimization

Author

Listed:
  • Kral Pavol

    (University of Žilina, Faculty of Operation and Economics of Transport and Communications, Department of Economics, Univerzitná 1, 010 26Žilina, Slovakia)

  • Janoskova Katarina

    (University of Žilina, Faculty of Operation and Economics of Transport and Communications, Department of Economics, Univerzitná 1, 010 26Žilina, Slovakia)

  • Durana Pavol

    (University of Žilina, Faculty of Operation and Economics of Transport and Communications, Department of Economics, Univerzitná 1, 010 26Žilina, Slovakia)

Abstract

Research purpose. The aim of the paper is to create a model that allows building an optimal brand portfolio, allowing an organisation to achieve its goals. The created model is based on the bivalent programming theory. A mathematical model of optimum brand portfolio is created based on linear programming with restricting conditions being the maximum acceptable risk level and budget. The basic types of resources and basic types of relations between brands are explained, which are part of the process of brand portfolio optimization.Design / Methodology / Approach. Knowledge and many years of experience of mainly economic disciplines were used for the selection of characteristics for brand portfolio specified in this article. Our assumptions were based mainly on project portfolio management, operational analysis and linear programming as well as tools and methods of graph theory.Findings. Brand portfolio management such as creating, planning, organising and then maintaining a successful brand is a costly and long-term process involving effective marketing strategies and decisions. The prerequisite for brand portfolio creation is deciding on the number and type of brands. A properly constructed brand portfolio is a prerequisite for achieving business goals.Originality / Value / Practical implications. Brand portfolio optimisation requires sufficient attention; however, rather than the selection of the highest number of brands, it should be based on compilation of a set, according to pre-defined priorities, which would provide the best possible means to meet the company’s goals for the current limitations. It should be implemented upon objective rules (in our case maximum allowable risk level and available budget). Frequent changes in the brand portfolio structure are not beneficial since they reduce the ability for the company to achieve its targets and represent excessive use of resources. In addition, qualitative brand characteristics have to be respected in the brand portfolio management, but this was not covered in our research.

Suggested Citation

  • Kral Pavol & Janoskova Katarina & Durana Pavol, 2019. "Linear Model for Brand Portfolio Optimization," Economics and Culture, Sciendo, vol. 16(1), pages 32-39, June.
    • Handle: RePEc:vrs:ecocul:v:16:y:2019:i:1:p:32-39:n:4
    DOI: 10.2478/jec-2019-0004
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://doi.org/10.2478/jec-2019-0004
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.2478/jec-2019-0004?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ujwal Kayande & John H. Roberts & Gary L. Lilien & Duncan K. H. Fong, 2007. "Mapping the Bounds of Incoherence: How Far Can You Go and How Does It Affect Your Brand?," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 26(4), pages 504-513, 07-08.
    2. Nguyen, Hang T. & Zhang, Yufei & Calantone, Roger J., 2018. "Brand portfolio coherence: Scale development and empirical demonstration," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 60-80.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nguyen, Hang T. & Zhang, Yufei & Calantone, Roger J., 2018. "Brand portfolio coherence: Scale development and empirical demonstration," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 35(1), pages 60-80.
    2. Klaus Heine & Glyn Atwal & Sandrine Crener-Ricard & Michel Phan, 2018. "Personality-driven luxury brand management," Journal of Brand Management, Palgrave Macmillan, vol. 25(5), pages 474-487, September.
    3. Muhammad Aftab Alam & David Rooney & Erik Lundmark & Murray Taylor, 2023. "The Ethics of Sharing: Does Generosity Erode the Competitive Advantage of an Ecosystem Firm?," Journal of Business Ethics, Springer, vol. 187(4), pages 821-839, November.
    4. Beichen Liang, 2022. "How brand experience, satisfaction, trust, and commitment affect loyalty: a reexamination and reconciliation," Italian Journal of Marketing, Springer, vol. 2022(2), pages 203-231, June.
    5. Yanhui Zhao & Yufei Zhang & Joyce (Feng) Wang & Wyatt A. Schrock & Roger J. Calantone, 2020. "Brand relevance and the effects of product proliferation across product categories," Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, Springer, vol. 48(6), pages 1192-1210, November.
    6. Baudier, Patricia & Ammi, Chantal & Hikkerova, Lubica, 2022. "Impact of advertising on users’ perceptions regarding the Internet of things," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 355-366.
    7. Fowler, Kendra & Bridges, Eileen, 2010. "Consumer innovativeness: Impact on expectations, perceptions, and choice among retail formats," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 17(6), pages 492-500.
    8. Kirca, Ahmet H. & Randhawa, Praneet & Talay, M. Berk & Akdeniz, M. Billur, 2020. "The interactive effects of product and brand portfolio strategies on brand performance: Longitudinal evidence from the U.S. automotive industry," International Journal of Research in Marketing, Elsevier, vol. 37(2), pages 421-439.
    9. Aftab Alam, Muhammad & Rooney, David & Taylor, Murray, 2022. "Measuring Inter-Firm Openness in Innovation Ecosystems," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 436-456.
    10. Qiong Wang & Ujwal Kayande & Sandy Jap, 2010. "The Seeds of Dissolution: Discrepancy and Incoherence in Buyer-Supplier Exchange," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 29(6), pages 1109-1124, 11-12.
    11. Donnelly, Shannon & Gee, Liz & Silva, Emmanuel Sirimal, 2020. "UK mid-market department stores: Is fashion product assortment one key to regaining competitive advantage?," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    12. Mathew B. Chylinski & John H. Roberts & Bruce G. S. Hardie, 2012. "Consumer Learning of New Binary Attribute Importance Accounting for Priors, Bias, and Order Effects," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(4), pages 549-566, July.
    13. Ho, Hillbun & Osiyevskyy, Oleksiy & Agarwal, James & Reza, Sadat, 2020. "Does ambidexterity in marketing pay off? The role of absorptive capacity," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 110(C), pages 65-79.
    14. Paulo Albuquerque & Bart J. Bronnenberg, 2009. "Estimating Demand Heterogeneity Using Aggregated Data: An Application to the Frozen Pizza Category," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 28(2), pages 356-372, 03-04.
    15. n/a, 2012. "Commentaries and Reply to "Can Brand Extension Signal Product Quality?" by Sridhar Moorthy," Marketing Science, INFORMS, vol. 31(5), pages 771-778, September.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    Brand strategy; Brand portfolio; Optimisation; Resources;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • M31 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Marketing
    • M39 - Business Administration and Business Economics; Marketing; Accounting; Personnel Economics - - Marketing and Advertising - - - Other
    • L19 - Industrial Organization - - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance - - - Other

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:vrs:ecocul:v:16:y:2019:i:1:p:32-39:n:4. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Peter Golla (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://www.sciendo.com .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.