IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/url/izvest/v20y2019i4p70-87.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Modelling of environmental and economic efficiency: A case of the Ural region

Author

Listed:
  • Daria S. Benz

    (Chelyabinsk State University)

Abstract

The race for economic growth has its price, and regrettably, leads to negative ecological consequences. A recent economic slowdown in the Ural region also has been accompanied with some serious environmental problems. Against such a background, the paper attempts to identify the growth rates of industrial production that comply with the concept of environmental and economic efficiency. The methodological basis of the research is the new classical economics according to which the economic growth can be described using the production function reflecting the dependence of the output sold on the production factors involved. For the purposes of the research, the author expands the number of variables and supplements labour and capital, the classical independent variables, with industrial output, average per capita income, and expenditures on technological innovations. According to the findings of the correlation analysis, the strongest correlation is between the growth rates of gross regional product and the growth rates of average per capita income and investments into fixed capital. Additionally, the findings reveal a moderate correlation between the growth rates of the emission of pollutants into the atmosphere and the growth rates of industrial production and the growth of the current expenditures on environmental protection. The author constructs four regressions. Two models represent multiple nonlinear regression; another two show pair linear dependence. The first model reflects the dependence of economic growth rates on the factors mentioned above. The second regression, also being a multiple nonlinear one, shows the dependence of growth rates of harmful emissions into the atmosphere on three factors: growth rates of industrial production, current and capital expenditures on environmental protection. In the pair linear regressions, the independent variable is the growth rates of industrial production. The dependent variables are, in the first case, the growth rates of gross regional product, and in the second case, environmental efficiency coefficient. In line with the findings, the optimum growth rate of industrial production, at which the harmful emissions into the atmosphere can decrease by 4 % equals to 0.95.

Suggested Citation

  • Daria S. Benz, 2019. "Modelling of environmental and economic efficiency: A case of the Ural region," Journal of New Economy, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 20(4), pages 70-87, September.
    • Handle: RePEc:url:izvest:v:20:y:2019:i:4:p:70-87
    DOI: 10.29141/2073-1019-2019-20-4-4
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://jne.usue.ru/images/download/84/4.pdf
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: http://jne.usue.ru/en/issues-2019/821
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.29141/2073-1019-2019-20-4-4?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Partha Dasgupta & Dale Southerton & Alistair Ulph & David Ulph, 2016. "Consumer Behaviour with Environmental and Social Externalities: Implications for Analysis and Policy," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 65(1), pages 191-226, September.
    2. Aisha Dasgupta & Partha Dasgupta, 2017. "Socially Embedded Preferences, Environmental Externalities, and Reproductive Rights," Population and Development Review, The Population Council, Inc., vol. 43(3), pages 405-441, September.
    3. Dasgupta, A. & Dasgupta, P., 2017. "Socially Embedded Preferences, Environmental Externalities, and Reproductive Rights," Cambridge Working Papers in Economics 1724, Faculty of Economics, University of Cambridge.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Reyer Gerlagh & Veronica Lupi & Marzio Galeotti, 2023. "Fertility and climate change," Scandinavian Journal of Economics, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 125(1), pages 208-252, January.
    2. Jin Hu & Peter Josef Stauvermann & Juncheng Sun, 2022. "The Impact of the Two-Child Policy on the Pension Shortfall in China: A Case Study of Anhui Province," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(13), pages 1-21, July.
    3. Partha Dasgupta, 2022. "The Economics of Biodiversity: Afterword," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 83(4), pages 1017-1039, December.
    4. Partha Dasgupta & Aisha Dasgupta & Scott Barrett, 2023. "Population, Ecological Footprint and the Sustainable Development Goals," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 84(3), pages 659-675, March.
    5. Ronald R. Kumar & Peter J. Stauvermann, 2019. "The Effects of a Revenue-Neutral Child Subsidy Tax Mechanism on Growth and GHG Emissions," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(9), pages 1-23, May.
    6. Haydn Washington & Helen Kopnina, 2022. "Discussing the Silence and Denial around Population Growth and Its Environmental Impact. How Do We Find Ways Forward?," World, MDPI, vol. 3(4), pages 1-19, December.
    7. Catriona Towriss & Ian Timæus, 2018. "Contraceptive use and lengthening birth intervals in rural and urban Eastern Africa," Demographic Research, Max Planck Institute for Demographic Research, Rostock, Germany, vol. 38(64), pages 2027-2052.
    8. Mattauch, Linus & Hepburn, Cameron & Stern, Nicholas, 2018. "Pigou pushes preferences: decarbonisation and endogenous values," INET Oxford Working Papers 2018-16, Institute for New Economic Thinking at the Oxford Martin School, University of Oxford.
    9. Bonnet, Céline & Bouamra-Mechemache, Zohra & Réquillart, Vincent & Treich, Nicolas, 2020. "Viewpoint: Regulating meat consumption to improve health, the environment and animal welfare," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 97(C).
    10. Bazoche, Pascale & Guinet, Nicolas & Poret, Sylvaine & Teyssier, Sabrina, 2021. "Does the provision of information increase the substitution of animal proteins with plant-based proteins? An experimental investigation into consumer choices," Working Papers 313663, Institut National de la recherche Agronomique (INRA), Departement Sciences Sociales, Agriculture et Alimentation, Espace et Environnement (SAE2).
    11. Siriluck Thammanu & Hee Han & E. M. B. P. Ekanayake & Yoonkoo Jung & Joosang Chung, 2021. "The Impact on Ecosystem Services and the Satisfaction Therewith of Community Forest Management in Northern Thailand," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(23), pages 1-31, December.
    12. Dina Kassab, 2020. "Tax Exemptions of Ethical Products Revisited," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 77(2), pages 423-447, October.
    13. Bazoche, Pascale & Guinet, Nicolas & Poret, Sylvaine & Teyssier, Sabrina, 2023. "Does the provision of information increase the substitution of animal proteins with plant-based proteins? An experimental investigation into consumer choices," Food Policy, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    14. Ngo Van Long, 2019. "Dynamic Games of Common-Property Resource Exploitation When Self-Image Matters," CESifo Working Paper Series 7880, CESifo.
    15. Konc, Théo & Savin, Ivan & van den Bergh, Jeroen C.J.M., 2021. "The social multiplier of environmental policy: Application to carbon taxation," Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    16. Jibonayan Raychaudhuri & Ada Wossink, 2018. "Ecolabels and The Economic Recession," Economics Discussion Paper Series 1807, Economics, The University of Manchester.
    17. Adam Czudec, 2022. "The Altruistic Behaviour of Consumers Who Prefer a Local Origin of Organic Food," Agriculture, MDPI, vol. 12(4), pages 1-12, April.
    18. Mattauch, Linus & Hepburn, Cameron & Spuler, Fiona & Stern, Nicholas, 2022. "The economics of climate change with endogenous preferences," Resource and Energy Economics, Elsevier, vol. 69(C).
    19. Endre Kildal Iversen & Kristine Grimsrud & Yohei Mitani & Henrik Lindhjem, 2022. "Altruist Talk May (also) Be Cheap: Revealed Versus Stated Altruism as a Predictor in Stated Preference Studies," Environmental & Resource Economics, Springer;European Association of Environmental and Resource Economists, vol. 83(3), pages 681-708, November.
    20. Alistair Ulph & David Ulph, 2023. "International Cooperation and Kantian Moral Behaviour – Complements or Substitutes?," Economics Discussion Paper Series 2302, Economics, The University of Manchester.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    regional economic growth; regional environmental efficiency; Ural region; concept of environmental and economic efficiency; modeling; correlation analysis; regression analysis.;
    All these keywords.

    JEL classification:

    • Q01 - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics; Environmental and Ecological Economics - - General - - - Sustainable Development
    • O13 - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth - - Economic Development - - - Agriculture; Natural Resources; Environment; Other Primary Products
    • C51 - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods - - Econometric Modeling - - - Model Construction and Estimation

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:url:izvest:v:20:y:2019:i:4:p:70-87. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Victor Blaginin (email available below). General contact details of provider: https://edirc.repec.org/data/usueeru.html .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.