Optimal Capital Income Taxation with Incomplete Markets, Borrowing Constraints, and Constant Discounting
For a wide class of infinitely lived agent models, Christophe Chamley (1986) has shown that the optimal capital income tax rate is zero in the long run. Robert E. Lucas (1990) has argued that, for the U.S. economy, there is a significant welfare gain from switching to this policy. This paper shows that, for the Bewley class of models with incomplete insurance markets and borrowing constraints, the optimal tax rate on capital income is positive, even in the long run. Therefore, cutting the capital income tax to zero may well lead to welfare losses. Copyright 1995 by University of Chicago Press.
This item is featured on the following reading lists or Wikipedia pages:
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:ucp:jpolec:v:103:y:1995:i:6:p:1158-75. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Journals Division)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.