Union Wage Differentials for Covered Members and Nonmembers in Great Britain
I present the first longitudinal estimates of covered union member and covered nonmember wage differentials in Great Britain. Cross-sectional estimates show that covered union members receive a premium of about 10 percent over other workers, but covered nonmembers have no significant wage differential. Longitudinal estimates that accounted for fixed effects, selectivity, and measurement error indicated that OLS estimates are downward biased. The "true" union wage differential is likely about 30-35 percent. There is a large negative selection effect to union membership. No robust estimate could be found for covered nonmembers.
If you experience problems downloading a file, check if you have the proper application to view it first. In case of further problems read the IDEAS help page. Note that these files are not on the IDEAS site. Please be patient as the files may be large.
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to look for a different version under "Related research" (further below) or search for a different version of it.
Volume (Year): 21 (2000)
Issue (Month): 1 (January)
|Contact details of provider:|| Web page: http://transactionpub.metapress.com/link.asp?target=journal&id=110581|
When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:tra:jlabre:v:21:y:2000:i:1:p:133-147. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: (Christopher F. Baum)
If references are entirely missing, you can add them using this form.