IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/taf/tsysxx/v45y2014i5p873-887.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An integrated supply chain model for new products with imprecise production and supply under scenario dependent fuzzy random demand

Author

Listed:
  • Lokesh Nagar
  • Pankaj Dutta
  • Karuna Jain

Abstract

In the present day business scenario, instant changes in market demand, different source of materials and manufacturing technologies force many companies to change their supply chain planning in order to tackle the real-world uncertainty. The purpose of this paper is to develop a multi-objective two-stage stochastic programming supply chain model that incorporates imprecise production rate and supplier capacity under scenario dependent fuzzy random demand associated with new product supply chains. The objectives are to maximise the supply chain profit, achieve desired service level and minimise financial risk. The proposed model allows simultaneous determination of optimum supply chain design, procurement and production quantities across the different plants, and trade-offs between inventory and transportation modes for both inbound and outbound logistics. Analogous to chance constraints, we have used the possibility measure to quantify the demand uncertainties and the model is solved using fuzzy linear programming approach. An illustration is presented to demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed model. Sensitivity analysis is performed for maximisation of the supply chain profit with respect to different confidence level of service, risk and possibility measure. It is found that when one considers the service level and risk as robustness measure the variability in profit reduces.

Suggested Citation

  • Lokesh Nagar & Pankaj Dutta & Karuna Jain, 2014. "An integrated supply chain model for new products with imprecise production and supply under scenario dependent fuzzy random demand," International Journal of Systems Science, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(5), pages 873-887, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:taf:tsysxx:v:45:y:2014:i:5:p:873-887
    DOI: 10.1080/00207721.2012.742594
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://hdl.handle.net/10.1080/00207721.2012.742594
    Download Restriction: Access to full text is restricted to subscribers.

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1080/00207721.2012.742594?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. R. E. Bellman & L. A. Zadeh, 1970. "Decision-Making in a Fuzzy Environment," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(4), pages 141-164, December.
    2. Petrovic, Dobrila & Roy, Rajat & Petrovic, Radivoj, 1999. "Supply chain modelling using fuzzy sets," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(1-3), pages 443-453, March.
    3. Messina, E. & Mitra, G., 1997. "Modelling and analysis of multistage stochastic programming problems: A software environment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 101(2), pages 343-359, September.
    4. Chen, Chen-Tung & Lin, Ching-Torng & Huang, Sue-Fn, 2006. "A fuzzy approach for supplier evaluation and selection in supply chain management," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(2), pages 289-301, August.
    5. Xie, Ying & Petrovic, Dobrila & Burnham, Keith, 2006. "A heuristic procedure for the two-level control of serial supply chains under fuzzy customer demand," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 102(1), pages 37-50, July.
    6. Santoso, Tjendera & Ahmed, Shabbir & Goetschalckx, Marc & Shapiro, Alexander, 2005. "A stochastic programming approach for supply chain network design under uncertainty," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 167(1), pages 96-115, November.
    7. Petrovic, Dobrila & Xie, Ying & Burnham, Keith & Petrovic, Radivoj, 2008. "Coordinated control of distribution supply chains in the presence of fuzzy customer demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 185(1), pages 146-158, February.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Madhukar Nagare & Pankaj Dutta & Naoufel Cheikhrouhou, 2016. "Optimal ordering policy for newsvendor models with bidirectional changes in demand using expert judgment," OPSEARCH, Springer;Operational Research Society of India, vol. 53(3), pages 620-647, September.
    2. Oshmita Dey, 2019. "A fuzzy random integrated inventory model with imperfect production under optimal vendor investment," Operational Research, Springer, vol. 19(1), pages 101-115, March.
    3. Ravi Shankar Kumar & M. K. Tiwari & A. Goswami, 2016. "Two-echelon fuzzy stochastic supply chain for the manufacturer–buyer integrated production–inventory system," Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, Springer, vol. 27(4), pages 875-888, August.
    4. Utama, Dana Marsetiya & Santoso, Imam & Hendrawan, Yusuf & Dania, Wike Agustin Prima, 2022. "Integrated procurement-production inventory model in supply chain: A systematic review," Operations Research Perspectives, Elsevier, vol. 9(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Peidro, David & Mula, Josefa & Jiménez, Mariano & del Mar Botella, Ma, 2010. "A fuzzy linear programming based approach for tactical supply chain planning in an uncertainty environment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 205(1), pages 65-80, August.
    2. Shih-Pin Chen, 2017. "Effects of fuzzy data on decision making in a competitive supply chain," Journal of the Operational Research Society, Palgrave Macmillan;The OR Society, vol. 68(10), pages 1146-1160, October.
    3. Tang, Christopher S. & Davarzani, Hoda & Sarkis, Joseph, 2015. "Quantitative models for managing supply chain risks: A reviewAuthor-Name: Fahimnia, Behnam," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 247(1), pages 1-15.
    4. Wong, Bo K. & Lai, Vincent S., 2011. "A survey of the application of fuzzy set theory in production and operations management: 1998-2009," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 129(1), pages 157-168, January.
    5. Yang Yu & Ray Qing Cao & Dara Schniederjans, 2017. "Cloud computing and its impact on service level: a multi-agent simulation model," International Journal of Production Research, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 55(15), pages 4341-4353, August.
    6. Chen, Lisa Y. & Wang, Tien-Chin, 2009. "Optimizing partners' choice in IS/IT outsourcing projects: The strategic decision of fuzzy VIKOR," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 120(1), pages 233-242, July.
    7. V. Alpagut Yavuz, 2016. "An Analysis of Job Change Decision Using a Hybrid Mcdm Method: A Comparative Analysis," International Journal of Business and Social Research, MIR Center for Socio-Economic Research, vol. 6(3), pages 60-75, March.
    8. Kannan, Devika & Jabbour, Ana Beatriz Lopes de Sousa & Jabbour, Charbel José Chiappetta, 2014. "Selecting green suppliers based on GSCM practices: Using fuzzy TOPSIS applied to a Brazilian electronics company," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 233(2), pages 432-447.
    9. Baskaran, Venkatesan & Nachiappan, Subramanian & Rahman, Shams, 2012. "Indian textile suppliers' sustainability evaluation using the grey approach," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 135(2), pages 647-658.
    10. Colubi, Ana & Ramos-Guajardo, Ana Belén, 2023. "Fuzzy sets and (fuzzy) random sets in Econometrics and Statistics," Econometrics and Statistics, Elsevier, vol. 26(C), pages 84-98.
    11. Hatami-Marbini, Adel & Tavana, Madjid, 2011. "An extension of the Electre I method for group decision-making under a fuzzy environment," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 39(4), pages 373-386, August.
    12. Tien-Fu Liang, 2012. "Integrated manufacturing/distribution planning decisions with multiple imprecise goals in an uncertain environment," Quality & Quantity: International Journal of Methodology, Springer, vol. 46(1), pages 137-153, January.
    13. Wątróbski, Jarosław & Jankowski, Jarosław & Ziemba, Paweł & Karczmarczyk, Artur & Zioło, Magdalena, 2019. "Generalised framework for multi-criteria method selection," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 107-124.
    14. Shen, Lixin & Olfat, Laya & Govindan, Kannan & Khodaverdi, Roohollah & Diabat, Ali, 2013. "A fuzzy multi criteria approach for evaluating green supplier's performance in green supply chain with linguistic preferences," Resources, Conservation & Recycling, Elsevier, vol. 74(C), pages 170-179.
    15. Wee, Hui-Ming & Lo, Chien-Chung & Hsu, Ping-Hui, 2009. "A multi-objective joint replenishment inventory model of deteriorated items in a fuzzy environment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(2), pages 620-631, September.
    16. Handfield, Robert & Warsing, Don & Wu, Xinmin, 2009. "(Q,r) Inventory policies in a fuzzy uncertain supply chain environment," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 197(2), pages 609-619, September.
    17. Roozbeh Nia, Ali & Hemmati Far, Mohammad & Akhavan Niaki, Seyed Taghi, 2014. "A fuzzy vendor managed inventory of multi-item economic order quantity model under shortage: An ant colony optimization algorithm," International Journal of Production Economics, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 259-271.
    18. Dey, Oshmita & Chakraborty, Debjani, 2009. "Fuzzy periodic review system with fuzzy random variable demand," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 198(1), pages 113-120, October.
    19. Bihter Gizem Demircan & Kaan Yetilmezsoy, 2023. "A Hybrid Fuzzy AHP-TOPSIS Approach for Implementation of Smart Sustainable Waste Management Strategies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(8), pages 1-23, April.
    20. V. Alpagut Yavuz, 2016. "An Analysis of Job Change Decision Using a Hybrid Mcdm Method: A Comparative Analysis," International Journal of Business and Social Research, LAR Center Press, vol. 6(3), pages 60-75, March.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:taf:tsysxx:v:45:y:2014:i:5:p:873-887. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Chris Longhurst (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.tandfonline.com/TSYS20 .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.